ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
FEDERAL PRACTICE / USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS / SNAP INELIGIBLE ITEMS VIOLATIONS
4 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS · TOPIC GUIDE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

SNAP Ineligible Items Violations.

Part of the USDA SNAP violation defense library for retail store owners - charge letters, disqualification, civil money penalties, and appeals.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

Whether it is a convenience store, large supermarket, or even a delivery route or meat market, EBT benefits can be used to make food purchases. However, there may be times when ineligible items, such as gasoline or alcohol, are purchased by EBT customers. In some cases, these purchases are intentionally allowed by store owners, managers, or other employees. But in other instances, purchases of ineligible items are due to mistakes on the part of individuals who are not aware of SNAP regulations. Nevertheless, when violations take place, the USDA will crack down hard. If you are facing SNAP violation allegations from the USDA, you will need a sound legal defense to avoid disqualification penalties, which is why you should only rely on attorneys who specialize in retailer defense for these matters.

Term Disqualification

When you receive a letter from the USDA detailing the allegations against you, it will likely contain the possible penalties your business may incur. This may include what is known as a term disqualification, which means your business would be temporarily disqualified from accepting EBT benefits from customers. If your SNAP violations are considered to be somewhat minor, you may be facing a suspension of only six months. However, if your violations are deemed to be more serious, this temporary disqualification could last three to five years.  For example, if you sold gems, gemstones, birthstones, etc, this could be a violation. Needless to say, any disqualification, be it a few months or several years, may be damaging enough financially to force you to close or sell your business. Unfortunately, the USDA does not negotiate settlements once it believes violations have occurred, which means you will need an attorney on your side who can actively fight the agency's charges in court.

Permanent Disqualification

When the USDA is considering the possibility of slapping a permanent disqualification on your business, this often means it supposedly has evidence you and your business are guilty of SNAP trafficking. If this happened, this points to the agency believing you or other employees swapped EBT benefits with customers in exchange for cash or other items, which may include weapons or drugs. If your business is located in a smaller community or neighborhood, don't be surprised if trafficking is at the center of the USDA's targeting your business for disqualification. If you allow this penalty to be imposed on your business, it will have long-lasting consequences that may close your business for good, impact your ability to secure future employment, or make it impossible to obtain loans for a new home. To avoid this penalty that is used far too often on small businesses, contact a lawyer who knows how to plan a strong defense and fight the USDA.

Incorrect Information

In many cases where the USDA plans to enact disqualification penalties against a retailer, it is discovered the agency is basing its charges on incorrect information. Though the agency will say it has analyzed numerous transactions from your store that it considers to be suspicious in nature, case analysts for the agency often interpret information incorrectly or get your store's information mixed up with others who have committed SNAP violations. If you believe this to be the case with your store, do not hesitate to begin fighting to clear your name. Since the agency makes it hard for businesses to appeal these decisions by allowing only 10 days to file an appeal, you should take the charge letter you received from the USDA to a skilled attorney who can examine the charges against you, explain your options, and give you sound advice on how to proceed.

Undercover Investigations

If the USDA believes your store may be involved in SNAP trafficking, it will use its investigators to go undercover at your store by pretending to be customers who want to make illegal purchases or exchange EBT for other items. If you have new employees who may not understand the complexities of SNAP, they can often be coerced into making transactions that bolster the USDA's case against your store. Unfortunately, even if it was your employees who made poor choices or wrong decisions, the USDA will still hold you responsible for whatever took place, since you are either the store's owner or manager. Therefore, making the mistake of immediately contacting the USDA and blaming others for the situation will only make a bad situation worse. Instead, don't panic and use your time wisely by speaking to a SNAP disqualification retailer defense attorney who can take over your case immediately.

Your Appeal Process

Since you do not want the USDA to be successful in its plans to implement a disqualification of any kind against your business, you will of course want to take advantage of the appeal process. This will consist of an administrative appeal and a judicial appeal, which is often needed since the USDA rules against most retailers initially in the administrative appeal review. Due to the fact that your case may wind up being heard in court, it is vital you not make critical mistakes along the way that could damage your case beyond repair. For example, never take it upon yourself to contact the USDA and try to explain your way out of an alleged SNAP violation. Though agency personnel you speak with by phone will sound sympathetic to your situation, they are actually waiting for you to say things that will incriminate you and can be used against you in court. Rather than let off-the-cuff comments lead to a SNAP disqualification for your business, let your attorney handle all communication with the USDA.

To ensure you have the best legal defense against the USDA's allegations, schedule a consultation immediately with a lawyer who can prevent your business from being yet another victim of the disqualification penalty.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.