ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · MARYLAND
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Maryland SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

Protecting Legal Rights and Interests in a SNAP Violation Case

As is the case with many merchants that sell groceries, your business may participate in SNAP. In other words, your store accepts EBT payments from individuals who qualify for supplemental food assistance through the USDA SNAP.

As can happen, even if you are meticulous in dealing with matters associated with the program, your business may have received a USDA SNAP violation notice. If that has occurred, you likely have many questions. You undoubtedly wonder what you can and cannot do to protect your business and launch a defense against a USDA SNAP violation.

Types of SNAP Violations

There exist a variety of different types of alleged conduct that can give rise to SNAP violations. With that said, there are some allegations of misconduct that more commonly are enumerated in USDA SNAP violation notices.

One of the most common types of SNAP violations involves a merchant that permits a customer to purchase unapproved items with an EBT card. Examples of unapproved items include beer and various nonfood items.

Another common type of allegation centers on a merchant that permitted a person not qualified to use an EBT card to transact business with one. Even if a merchant lacked actual knowledge of this type of situation, a violation notice might be handed down if a merchant reasonably should have known what was occurring.

The failure to accurately complete an application to participate in SNAP in the first instance can result in a merchant receiving a SNAP violation. Typically, this involves an applicant making a material misstatement of fact on the application to participate in the program.

The Violation Process

The first stage of the USDA SNAP violation process is the receipt of the violation notice itself by the merchant. The violation notice specifically enumerates what a merchant is alleged to have done in contravention of the rules and regs of SNAP. Typically, there is supporting documentation attached to the notice itself.

Once received, a merchant has 10 days to tender a response to the allegations to the USDA. The failure to meet this deadline results in the agency being able to take the position that the merchant has admitted the violation allegations.

When the agency receives the response to the violation notice, what is called an administrative or agency review process commences. The USDA reviews the contentions raised in the violation notice, together with the response from the merchant.

After this review, the USDA can dismiss the violation notice, can uphold the violation notice, or uphold some of the allegations and dismiss others. At this juncture, if violations still pend against the merchant, the store can file what is called an application for judicial review.

Judicial review of a USDA determination associated with SNAP is undertaken by the United States District Court. If the court rules in favor of the merchant, the violation matter typically comes to an end. If the court rules in favor of the USDA, the merchant can appeal the matter to the U.S. Court of Appeals. In theory, the agency can appeal an adverse decision to the Court of Appeals as well.

USDA SNAP Sanctions

The sanctions that can be imposed by the USDA for a SNAP violation include a warning, a suspension, or removal from the program. If the allegation is less serious, and a merchant has had not problems with the agency in the past, a warning is likely on the first violation. On the other hand, if a merchant has had previous issues with the agency, or the allegations in the violation are serious or persistent, a longer term suspension or even removal from being a participating SNAP merchant are possibilities.

Legal Representation in a SNAP Violation Case

The procedures and rules associated with a SNAP violation matter can be complicated. As noted, the potential sanctions can be significant, and costly. For these reasons, if you find yourself facing a USDA SNAP violation notice, you likely best protect you legal rights and interests by retaining a lawyer. You can schedule an initial consultation with a SNAP violation lawyer, in most cases at no cost. During this preliminary session, you obtain an evaluation of the allegations as well as a presentation of what defenses might be available in your case.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.