ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
FROM THE DEFENSE DESK / NEW YORK PENAL LAW
5 AUG 2026 · UPDATED 20 AUG 2026 · 3 MIN READ · BY TODD A. SPODEK
THE BRIEF · FILED UNDER: NEW YORK PENAL LAW
DOCKET NO. 241 · THE DEFENSE DESK

NY Penal Law § 135.50: Custodial Interference in the First Degree.

Learn about custodial interference in the first degree under NY Penal Law § 135.50, including what constitutes the offense, real-life examples, related charges like kidnapping, possible legal defenses, and sentencing. Understand how New York law protects minors and those in lawful custody, and how penalties may apply in these cases.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · 5 AUG 2026 · 3 MIN READ
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST

There are numerous laws established to protect the welfare of children. A number of these laws are specifically designed to protect children as well as certain adults who are in the lawful custody of an individual or an institution. If you remove a person from the lawful custody of another individual or institution and refuse to return that person, you have committed a crime. If, on top of removing them, you do this in a manner that may cause harm to that person or if you remove the person from the State of New York, you could face a charge of custodial interference in the first degree. Under New York Penal Law § 135.50, custodial interference in the first degree is delineated as:

 

  • Taking, by a relative, a minor child who is under the age of 16 from the lawful custody of their parent or guardian with the intention of keeping the child away permanently or for a protracted period of time,
  • Taking an individual who is incompetent from the lawful custody of another person, or
  • Unlawfully removing someone who is lawfully in the custody of an institution;

 

and you additionally

 

  • Take the individual to another state, or
  • Place the person's health or safety in peril.

 

For Example

Jennifer had visitation with her 10 year old son three days a week, while the child's father has physical custody on the other four days of the week. At the end of her regular visitation, Jennifer attempted to return the child to his father. At the scheduled time, the father was not home and did not respond to repeated phone calls and messages. This was not abnormal. In response, Jennifer kept the child with her and continuously attempted to get in touch with the father. After two months Jennifer relocated to another state, since she was offered a better paying job. After three months, the child's father materialized, and he demanded Jennifer to return the child to him. Jennifer refused to do so. The father then reported Jennifer to the police. Jennifer could possibly be charged with custodial interference on the basis of the fact that she took the child to another state and then refused to return him to his father on demand. That said, Jennifer may also have a valid defense because, under the circumstances, it can be said that the child was abandoned by the custodial parent.

 

Offenses that are Related

Kidnapping in the first degree: New York Penal Law § 135.25

Custodial interference in the second degree: New York Penal Law § 135.45

 

Possible Defenses

Under the custodial interference in the first degree statute, it is a defense against such a charge if you remove the person from lawful custody due to the fact that the person has been abandoned or because the person has been subjected to abuse or mistreatment.

 

The Sentence

Since custodial interference in the first degree is categorized as a class E felony, the maximum possible prison sentence you could face is 4 years. In particular, if you have no prior convictions, the judge may decide to sentence you to a probation term of 5 years instead of sending you to serve a prison term.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
THE AUTHOR'S RECORD · PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
Acquitted.
$26M MONEY LAUNDERING
Dismissed.
RICO · 10-YEAR MINIMUM FACED
Six months.
$12M PONZI · YEARS ASKED
ALL RESULTS →
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
01
02
03
04
05
ANSWERED WITHIN 24 HOURS, GUARANTEED OR CALL 212 300 5196
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.