ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
FROM THE DEFENSE DESK / NEW YORK PENAL LAW
6 MAR 2026 · 2 MIN READ · BY TODD A. SPODEK
THE BRIEF · FILED UNDER: NEW YORK PENAL LAW · VIOLENT CRIMES
DOCKET NO. 197 · THE DEFENSE DESK

NY Penal Law § 120.25: Reckless endangerment in the first degree.

Learn about New York Penal Law § 120.25 for reckless endangerment in the first degree. Discover what constitutes depraved indifference to human life, possible defenses like factual impossibility, penalties including up to 7 years in prison, and real case examples. Understand the distinction from lesser charges and related offenses.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · 6 MAR 2026 · 2 MIN READ
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST

NY Penal Law § 120.25: Reckless endangerment in the first degree

If you behave in a manner that shows that you have no regard for human life, you could face a felony reckless endangerment in the first degree charge. It does not matter if no one was actually injured. In order to be charged and convicted of reckless endangerment, the prosecutor needs only to bring evidence to demonstrate that your actions place other people at risk. Reckless endangerment in the first degree is one of two reckless endangerment offenses in the New York criminal code. It is the more serious of the two charges, compared to reckless endangerment in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor offense.   You could be prosecuted under New York Penal Code § 120.25 if you recklessly engage in actions that creates a grave risk of death to another person under circumstances which evince a depraved indifference to human life. Over time, New York courts have interpreted the phrase "depraved indifference to human life" to mean "an utter disregard for the value of human life, a willingness to act not because one intends harm, but because one simply doesn't care whether grievous harm results or not."

 

Example

In People v. McGee, 930 N.Y.S.2d 117 (2011), the defendant, Mr. Demetrius McGee and his co-defendant drove around a residential neighborhood  in search of a particular person with the intention of shooting that person. In the course of attempting to shoot this person, the shots they fired landed at several residences. At the time, there were several children at play in front of these homes. As a result, Mr. McGee was convicted of the crime of reckless endangerment in the first degree.

 

Related Offenses

Reckless endangerment in the second degree: NY Penal Law § 120.20

Assault in the second degree: New York Penal Code § 120.05

Stalking in the first degree: New York Penal Code § 120.60

 

Possible Defenses

In order for a prosecuting attorney to successfully prosecute you on a charge of reckless endangerment in the first degree, the prosecutor must demonstrate that your behaviour did, in actuality, put others in danger. If it simply appeared to the police and others that your actions put people in danger, but a closer examination of the facts reveals that your actions really could not have hurt anyone, then you may have a sound defense.  The name for this kind of defense is  “factual impossibility”.

 

Sentence

Reckless endangerment in the first degree is categorized as a class D felony. The maximum possible sentence you could face for this crime is 7 years in prison. The final determination on the length of your prison sentence will depend on factors such as your prior criminal record, whether you take responsibility for your actions, and the facts surrounding your case. If you have no prior felony convictions, then the judge has a choice to send you to jail or to just sentence you to probation. If, on the other hand, you do have one or more prior felony convictions, the judge will sentence you to serve time in prison.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
THE AUTHOR'S RECORD · PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
Acquitted.
$26M MONEY LAUNDERING
Dismissed.
RICO · 10-YEAR MINIMUM FACED
Six months.
$12M PONZI · YEARS ASKED
ALL RESULTS →
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
01
02
03
04
05
ANSWERED WITHIN 24 HOURS, GUARANTEED OR CALL 212 300 5196
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.