Federal Kidnapping Charges: Lindbergh Law Defense.

What is the Lindbergh Law? The Lindbergh Law is the common name given to federal kidnapping statute 18 U.S.C. § 1201. This statute establishes federal jurisdiction over kidnapping, abduction, and holding crimes. If you are being accused of crossing a state line in connection with a kidnapping, abduction, or holding offense, you are likely being accused under the Lindbergh Law.

What Conduct Does the Lindbergh Law Cover?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a), kidnapping involves unlawfully seizing, confining, inveigling, decoying, kidnapping, abducting, or carrying away and holding a person when one of the statute’s specified federal-jurisdiction conditions applies. These requirements are essential components of a Lindbergh Law charge. Therefore, if you are facing charges under the statute, a key component of your defense will be to challenge the prosecution’s ability to prove each of these requirements.

What Purpose Does the Lindbergh Law Cover?

Another essential element of a federal kidnapping offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a) is to: - “holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person”

• “for ransom or reward”
• “or otherwise” These requirements apply to all federal kidnapping offenses. This is broad language, and, as a result, it covers all types of kidnapping offenses. While kidnapping for ransom is the most well-known example, the statute also covers cases of “human trafficking,” kidnapping motivated by “sexual desire,” and kidnapping motivated by “ideological or political goals.”

How Much Proof is Needed for a Lindbergh Law Conviction?

In federal court, any criminal defendant has a constitutional right to have the government’s case against them proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.” This standard applies to all criminal charges, and a federal kidnapping conviction requires this level of proof.

Does the Government Need Proof of Every Element of the Lindbergh Law?

Yes, the government must prove every essential element of a federal kidnapping charge beyond a reasonable doubt. If you are facing federal kidnapping charges, one of your primary defense goals should be challenging the government’s ability to meet its burden of proof at trial.

Which Facts Give § 1201 Federal Jurisdiction, and Which Do Not?

Transportation of the Victim Across State Lines

Transportation of the Defendant Across State Lines

Use of a Facility in Interstate Commerce

Kidnappings Within the Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States

Making Phone Calls

The prosecution is responsible for meeting its burden of proof, but you are responsible for building an effective defense. It is critical that you speak with a federal kidnapping defense lawyer before facing questioning from federal authorities. At Spodek Law Group, we defend clients accused of federal kidnapping charges and other federal crimes. If you are facing an investigation or are being charged with a federal kidnapping offense under the Lindbergh Law, call our federal criminal defense attorneys today for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your options for a strong and effective defense.

Federal Kidnapping Attorney at Spodek Law Group

The facts supporting federal jurisdiction in federal kidnapping offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 1201 vary greatly.

• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• § 1201 vary greatly.
• The facts supporting federal jurisdiction in federal kidnapping offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 1201 vary greatly.

How can defendants attack the indictment and evidence before trial?

Can You Seek a Pretrial Dismissal of a Federal Kidnapping Charge?

Yes. Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2), a defendant can move for a pretrial dismissal based on a jurisdictional defect.

The indictment must also allege the essential elements of the alleged offense (i.e., abduction). The defendant’s alibi may show the defendant was not at the scene of the abduction, was not involved in the abduction, did not transport the victim across state lines, or did not use the means or facility in interstate commerce as alleged.

The Prosecution Must Seek Court Approval to Withdraw the Indictment

If the prosecutors have decided to dismiss your federal kidnapping charges, they must seek court approval under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a).

Can You Challenge the Indictment for Insufficiency?

Yes. A defendant can challenge the insufficiency of an indictment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12. Insufficiency requires more than simply lacking detail and can, if successful, result in dismissal of the indictment before trial.

Can You Argue the Victim Consented to Your Actions at Trial?

Yes. The federal kidnapping statute applies to nonconsensual takings. If you are alleging the alleged kidnapping victim consented to your actions, then, in order to convict, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim did not consent to your actions. This can include:

• Testimony from the alleged kidnapping victim admitting consent
• Testimony from other witnesses about a relationship between the defendant and victim
• Evidence of the alleged kidnapping victim’s actions during and after the event

Can You Use Your Alibi to Challenge the Allegations in Your Federal Kidnapping Indictment?

Yes. As we explained earlier, the burden in proving a federal kidnapping charge under the Lindbergh Law is to prove a crime committed within federal jurisdiction. If you can offer evidence of an alibi, you can attack the government’s case by challenging one or more of the jurisdictional or substantive components. For example, the defendant may argue that he could not have either:

(i) The prosecution must prove the components of an abduction. The defendant’s alibi can show that he was not at the scene of the abduction, that he did not commit the abduction, did not transport the alleged kidnapping victim across state lines, and did not use a means or facility in interstate commerce, as alleged.

How Do Under-18 Victims and International Parental Kidnappings Change a Lindbergh Law Charge?

Under-18 Victims

If the victim is under 18, 18 U.S.C. § 1201(g) requires a sentence of at least 20 years when the offender is at least 18 and is not a parent, grandparent, sibling, aunt, uncle, or person having legal custody of the victim.

Statutory Exclusions for Under-18 Victims

The enhancement for kidnapping victims under the age of 18 excludes a parent, grandparent, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, or individual having legal custody of the victim. However, it is important to note that, according to the statute, a person who has terminated parental rights does not qualify as a parent for purposes of the child-related enhancement exclusion under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(h).

International Parental Kidnappings

Section 1201 generally excludes a minor kidnapped by the minor’s parent, while international parental kidnapping is addressed separately by 18 U.S.C. § 1204. This is referred to as “International Parental Kidnapping.” Section 1204 says, “Whoever removes a child from the United States, or attempts to do so, or retains a child (who has been in the United States) outside the United States with intent to obstruct the lawful exercise of parental rights” shall be fined or imprisoned for not more than three years, or both.

How Long Can Federal Kidnapping Penalties Last After Conviction?

Can Someone Be Imprisoned for Life for Federal Kidnapping?

Yes. Generally speaking, the federal kidnapping statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1201, permits imprisonment for any term of years or for life. This is due to the fact that federal kidnapping is viewed as a serious offense that can have devastating consequences for the victim. If you are facing a federal kidnapping charge under the Lindbergh Law, you need to rely on a defense team that can fight to protect your future.

Can the Death Penalty Be Imposed for Federal Kidnapping Under the Lindbergh Law?

The death penalty can be imposed if a federal kidnapping results in the death of any person. If the government is able to prove that a person died as a result of the kidnapping, it may seek the death penalty. If this is the case, it is all the more important to ensure you have a dedicated federal kidnapping defense attorney who can challenge the federal government’s evidence before trial.

What are the Penalties for a Federal Kidnapping Attempt?

An attempt to violate Section 1201 is punishable by not more than twenty years of imprisonment, while a conspiracy to violate Section 1201 is punishable by any term of years or life. While this is less than the life sentence that a federal kidnapping conviction can carry, an attempt or conspiracy to violate the Lindbergh Law is still a major federal offense that is not to be taken lightly.

Does Federal Kidnapping Have a Mandatory Minimum Sentence?

Federal kidnapping has a statutory minimum sentence of 20 years for certain offenses involving victims under 18 under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(g). This means that a judge can impose a sentence of any duration up to the federal kidnapping statutory maximum sentence.

Do Federal Sentencing Guidelines Guarantee a Particular Sentence After Conviction?

While a federal sentencing guideline may apply after a federal kidnapping conviction, it does not guarantee a particular sentence. Sentencing judges use federal sentencing guidelines to determine appropriate sentences. While it may be important to speak with a federal defense attorney about the guidelines, it is more important to work with a lawyer who can use them to advocate for a sentence at the bottom of the guidelines.

Calling About Someone You Love

Most first calls to a defense firm come from a family member rather than the person under investigation. If that is you, Spodek Law Group answers its phone at any hour, and families retain the firm on a relative's behalf every week. Reach it at 888 348 8028.