ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196

INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION · AFRICA

Extradition from Nigeria to the United States.

1931 U.S.-United Kingdom Extradition Treaty, extended to the Nigeria Protectorate and continued after independence controls the request. The treaty itself does not impose a blanket nationality prohibition. The arrest clock and local review path decide what happens next.

Counsel working on the international federal record
FIG. - COUNSEL · THE NIGERIA FILE
WRITTEN BYTodd A. Spodek
LEGAL REVIEWAttorney review pending
RESEARCH VERIFIED2026-07-14

THE SHORT ANSWER

Treaty route in force.

In force according to U.S. Code and current bilateral practice No reliable official general duration. The 2012 Mustapha case involved arrest in March 2011 and extradition in February 2012, but one example is not a standard.

TREATY ON THE RECORD

1931 U.S.-United Kingdom Extradition Treaty, extended to the Nigeria Protectorate and continued after independence

Effective: 1935-06-24

Own nationals
The treaty itself does not impose a blanket nationality prohibition. Nigeria's Extradition Act gives the Attorney General a central role and allows statutory refusal/discretion questions, including nationality-related considerations, to be addressed under Nigerian law; citizenship is not safely described as an automatic bar.
Dual criminality
The 1931 treaty is list-based, although listed categories are interpreted with domestic law and some multilateral conventions can provide additional authority. Modern dual-criminality similarity alone may not cure an unlisted offense.
Rule of specialty
Yes; the treaty limits prosecution after surrender to the extradition offense(s) subject to its terms.
Provisional arrest
Article 9 permits urgent provisional arrest on a warrant/complaint or authenticated notice. Release follows if the requisition is not made within two months, subject to the treaty and Nigerian implementing procedure.
Appeal path
Federal High Court decisions and detention issues may be challenged through Nigeria's appellate courts; constitutional fundamental-rights proceedings may also arise.

WHAT COUNSEL CHECKS FIRST

The active paper. The country. The clock.

Warrant or noticeCustody and location in NigeriaHearing or filing deadlineLocal-counsel requirement

THE RESPONSE ROOM

What has to be established first.

CUSTODY · PAPERS · CLOCK · COUNSEL

01

FIRST HOURS

Identify the legal basis for custody

Record the arresting authority, court, case number, custody location, interpreter need, and any hearing date. Ask for counsel before discussing the foreign accusation.

02

WHO DECIDES

The local record controls

A request goes through diplomatic channels to Nigeria's Attorney General of the Federation. The Attorney General may issue an authority to proceed; a Federal High Court magistrate/judge conducts the judicial inquiry, and surrender follows only after statutory certification and executive action.

03

THE CLOCK

Deadlines are event-specific

Article 9 permits urgent provisional arrest on a warrant/complaint or authenticated notice. Release follows if the requisition is not made within two months, subject to the treaty and Nigerian implementing procedure. No reliable official general duration. The 2012 Mustapha case involved arrest in March 2011 and extradition in February 2012, but one example is not a standard.

04

DOCUMENT AUDIT

Build the file before the argument

Preserve the notice or warrant, charging papers, identity records, release terms, travel documents, medical records, and every dated communication. Do not alter or delete evidence.

FOR FAMILIES COORDINATING ACROSS BORDERS

Confirm the exact legal name, detention location, medication needs, next hearing, local lawyer, and one reliable contact channel. A consulate may assist with welfare and contact; it cannot cancel the local case.

Tell the intake team where the person is now →

02 · THE PROCESS

How the Nigeria process moves.

REQUEST · COURT · REVIEW · SURRENDER

Judicial and executive stages

A request goes through diplomatic channels to Nigeria's Attorney General of the Federation. The Attorney General may issue an authority to proceed; a Federal High Court magistrate/judge conducts the judicial inquiry, and surrender follows only after statutory certification and executive action.

Appeal and review

Federal High Court decisions and detention issues may be challenged through Nigeria's appellate courts; constitutional fundamental-rights proceedings may also arise.

Diagram separating judicial eligibility review from the executive surrender decision
FIG. - COURT CERTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE ACTION ARE DIFFERENT DECISIONS

03 · DEFENSES

The request still has to survive the record.

Put the papers in front of counsel →

ISSUE

Treaty coverage

The charged conduct, punishment threshold, documents, and identity must fit the controlling treaty and local implementing law.

ISSUE

Dual criminality

The 1931 treaty is list-based, although listed categories are interpreted with domestic law and some multilateral conventions can provide additional authority. Modern dual-criminality similarity alone may not cure an unlisted offense.

ISSUE

Political and protected offenses

Political offenses are excluded. The treaty lists offenses and contains lapse-of-time rules; military and revenue conduct require list/statutory analysis. Nigeria's Extradition Act adds mandatory and discretionary restrictions.

ISSUE

Evidence and process

The request can be tested against the treaty standard, authentication requirements, limitation rules, and procedural guarantees that apply locally.

ISSUE

Human rights and punishment

Nigeria retains the death penalty for some offenses. When Nigeria requests surrender from an abolitionist jurisdiction, assurances may be required; when the United States requests surrender, Nigerian constitutional fair-hearing, prison, health and abuse-of-process claims may be litigated.

ISSUE

Specialty and assurances

Yes; the treaty limits prosecution after surrender to the extradition offense(s) subject to its terms.

04 · PUBLIC EXAMPLES

Recent public extradition records.

GOVERNMENT RECORDS · NOT FIRM MATTERS

These examples come from public government records and are not presented as Spodek Law Group matters or results.

2012-02-15

Rasheed Mustapha

mail-fraud and money-laundering conspiracies, 401(k) theft and aggravated identity theft

United States

05 · THE CHARGES

What appears in the requests.

PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
mail/wire fraud and business-email compromise
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
identity theft
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
money laundering
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
retirement-account theft
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
narcotics offenses where legally covered

A Red Notice is not the extradition order.

A Red Notice asks police worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person, subject to each country's law. It is not an international arrest warrant, and it does not replace the treaty papers or the local extradition case.

The notice, the provisional-arrest request, and the surrender proceeding are separate records. Each can carry different defects, deadlines, and remedies.

Read the Red Notice file →

07 · THIRD-COUNTRY RISK

A new border changes the law. It does not erase the file.

Transit can expose a person to another country's arrest rules, immigration powers, or provisional request. This page gives no route or evasion advice. Review the actual warrant, notice, release conditions, and jurisdictions with counsel before travel.

08 · QUESTIONS

What families and targets ask first.

FULL ANSWERS · SOURCE REVIEWED

IMMEDIATE EXTRADITION QUESTIONS

It can. Border screening may expose a national warrant, INTERPOL data, immigration authority, or a provisional request under another country's law. This is not travel or evasion advice; the actual records and jurisdictions require review before travel.

AUTHORITIESwww.interpol.int

COUNTRY PROCEDURE

Yes. 1931 U.S.-United Kingdom Extradition Treaty, extended to the Nigeria Protectorate and continued after independence is in force according to u.s. code and current bilateral practice; the stated effective date is 1935-06-24. Always verify treaty status with the U.S. State Department/Office of International Affairs for a live case.

AUTHORITIESwww.govinfo.govwww.govinfo.gov

Todd A. Spodek at the conference table
FIG. - TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNER

WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

Start with the paper, the posture, and the first deadline.

Todd A. Spodek leads the firm's federal defense work. The team identifies the active U.S. matter, the country and custody posture, and where appropriately licensed local counsel is required. No webpage can replace review of the actual request.

Todd Spodek - biography and record →

SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Put the actual extradition record in front of counsel.

Tell us whether this is an inquiry, Red Notice, detention, hearing, or appeal. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. Urgent custody and hearing matters should call.

212 300 5196 - urgent matters →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIREDCALL FOR URGENT MATTERS
01
02
03
04
05
06
07

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. The firm must first complete a conflict check and agree to the representation.