ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
5 AUG 2026 · UPDATED 20 AUG 2026 · 3 MIN READ · BY TODD A. SPODEK
THE BRIEF · FILED UNDER: DUI & DWI
DOCKET NO. 157 · THE DEFENSE DESK

New York Vehicle and Traffic Law 1192.3: Driving while intoxicated.

Learn about New York Vehicle and Traffic Law 1192.3 concerning driving while intoxicated (DWI). Discover the legal definition, possible arrest scenarios, evidence required, common defenses, and the importance of consulting a NYC criminal lawyer to challenge DWI charges and protect your rights under New York state law.

★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST

In the state of New York, a driver may be charged with driving while intoxicated if he or she has a blood alcohol content of .08 or higher. However, drivers may still be taken into custody if other facts make it likely that they are impaired by alcohol or other substances.

What the Law Says About DWI In New York

In New York state, it is possible to be taken into custody and charged with driving while intoxicated if your blood alcohol content is .08 or higher. However, the law does state that there does not need to be direct evidence that this was the case before taking you into custody.

If an officer notices that you have bloodshot eyes, slurred speech or trouble walking, that may be enough to be charged with DWI. While state law provides penalties for failing to take a breath or chemical test, a driver is not obligated to do so. Even without a breath or chemical test confirming a driver's blood alcohol content, an officer may still make an arrest.

Examples of DWI in New York State

In many cases, a police officer will observe a vehicle being driven erratically or too fast for road conditions. This may give the officer probable cause to initiate a traffic stop. For instance, if an officer sees a car swerving between multiple lanes or going off the road, this would be considered erratic.

Once the officer makes contact with the driver, he or she will look for signs of possible impairment. This may include bloodshot eyes, slurred speech or the smell of alcohol on the person's breath. In some cases, an officer may even find open containers of beer or liquor in the vehicle.

If there is reason to do so, the driver may be asked to complete a series of field sobriety tests. Based on the results of those tests and the officer's overall impression of what he or she observes, the driver may be taken into custody on a DWI charge.

Defenses to DWI in New York State

It may be possible to claim that there was no reason for an officer to conduct a traffic stop in the first place. It may also be possible to claim that the driver was stopped at an illegal checkpoint. Assuming that the traffic stop that led to the charge was legal, it may be possible to challenge the legitimacy of the evidence used to detain the driver.

For instance, an attorney may claim that a breath test was done incorrectly or that a blood test was taken too long after a traffic stop to be reliable. Although the lack of a chemical test may not stop an officer from charging a driver with DWI, it may ultimately lead to a case being dismissed due to lack of evidence.

If the police officer who took the driver into custody can't remember what happened before, during and after the traffic stop, it could cast doubt on the veracity of the charge. This may lead to the case being dismissed or a plea agreement being reached in the case.

Those who are charged with DWI in New York state may wish to talk to a NYC criminal lawyer. He or she may be able to review the case and take steps to either plead it down to a lesser charge or have it thrown out entirely. This may allow a driver to avoid some or all penalties that may have applied if he or she was convicted.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
THE AUTHOR'S RECORD · PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
Acquitted.
$26M MONEY LAUNDERING
Dismissed.
RICO · 10-YEAR MINIMUM FACED
Six months.
$12M PONZI · YEARS ASKED
ALL RESULTS →
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
01
02
03
04
05
ANSWERED WITHIN 24 HOURS, GUARANTEED OR CALL 212 300 5196
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.