Florida’s small business economy — tourism, hospitality, construction, healthcare, professional services — makes it one of the largest markets for merchant cash advances in the country. It is also a state where the legal tools for challenging MCA agreements are stronger than most business owners realize.

MCA funders target Florida businesses because the industries are seasonal, the cash flow cycles are volatile, and the demand for bridge financing is constant. A restaurant in Miami Beach that needs working capital for the winter season, a contractor in Tampa awaiting payment on a completed project, a medical practice in Orlando bridging an insurance reimbursement delay — these are the businesses that sign MCA agreements under pressure and discover the cost only after the daily withdrawals begin.

Florida’s legal framework provides several avenues for relief. The state’s usury statute applies to commercial transactions under certain circumstances, its consumer protection law is broad, and its courts are increasingly familiar with MCA disputes. The combination of these legal tools creates a more favorable environment for MCA borrowers than the industry would prefer.

The Legal Landscape in Florida

Florida Statutes Section 687.02 sets the general usury limit at 18% per annum for loans under $500,000. Section 687.071 establishes criminal usury at 25% per annum — the same threshold as New York. A criminally usurious loan in Florida is not only void but subjects the lender to criminal penalties including imprisonment. The statute applies to any extension of credit, which a court may interpret to include a recharacterized MCA.

Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, codified in Chapter 501, provides a cause of action for businesses harmed by deceptive or unfair practices. The statute covers misrepresentation of MCA costs, failure to honor contractual reconciliation rights, deceptive collection practices, and omission of material terms during the solicitation process. Prevailing plaintiffs can recover actual damages, attorney’s fees, and court costs. The statute’s fee-shifting provision means the business owner’s attorney is compensated by the defendant if the claim succeeds, reducing the financial barrier to litigation.

Florida does not authorize confessions of judgment. Florida Statutes Section 55.05 requires that a judgment be entered only after due process — a filed complaint, service of process, and an opportunity to respond. This is a critical protection. A New York confession of judgment cannot be directly domesticated in Florida without meeting Florida’s full faith and credit requirements, which include an opportunity to challenge the judgment’s validity. The funder cannot bypass the judicial process in Florida the way it can in New York.

The Florida Department of Financial Services and the Office of Financial Regulation have oversight authority over lending activity in the state. An entity making loans in Florida without proper licensing may face regulatory consequences. If the MCA is recharacterized as a loan, the funder’s licensing status becomes relevant.

Recharacterization and Usury

Florida courts apply the same substance-over-form analysis used nationally to determine whether an MCA is a loan. The inquiry focuses on risk: did the funder accept the possibility of receiving less than the contracted amount? If the contract eliminates that risk through fixed payments, personal guarantees, confessions of judgment, and non-functional reconciliation clauses, the transaction is a loan regardless of its label.

When a recharacterized MCA produces an effective APR exceeding 25%, the criminal usury statute applies. The agreement is void. The lender is potentially subject to criminal penalties. The borrower’s obligation is extinguished entirely — not reduced, not modified, but eliminated. Florida’s usury framework is as powerful as New York’s for business owners whose MCAs, properly characterized, exceed the threshold.

Florida’s prohibition on confessions of judgment means that MCA funders cannot use the expedited collection mechanism available in New York. The funder must file a lawsuit, serve the defendant, and litigate the claim through the normal judicial process. This procedural requirement gives Florida business owners more time, more notice, and more opportunities to mount a defense than business owners in confession-of-judgment states. The playing field in Florida is more level than in New York, and the business owner has the full protection of due process at every stage.

Your Relief Options

Usury defense and affirmative claims. If the MCA is recharacterized as a loan with an effective APR exceeding 18% (civil usury) or 25% (criminal usury), the agreement is either subject to penalty or void entirely. The criminal usury defense is the most powerful tool available because voidness is absolute. An attorney can calculate the effective rate using the actual payment amounts and timing, assess the recharacterization argument based on the contract terms and the funder’s conduct, and determine whether the usury defense applies.

FDUTPA claims. Deceptive marketing, cost misrepresentation, reconciliation refusal, unauthorized debits, and illegal collection practices are actionable under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The statute provides for damages and attorney’s fees, and the fee-shifting provision makes it economically viable to pursue claims that might not justify the cost of litigation in states without fee-shifting.

DEFENSE TEAM SPOTLIGHT

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar Admitted
Multi-State Licensed
Federal Courts

Meet the Full Team

Defense against domestication of out-of-state judgments. If a New York confession of judgment exists, Florida’s full faith and credit analysis provides an opportunity to challenge the judgment’s validity before it can be enforced against Florida assets. The challenge can raise all defenses available in the originating jurisdiction plus Florida-specific procedural requirements, including the state’s prohibition on confessions of judgment.

Settlement negotiation backed by genuine legal exposure — usury, FDUTPA, domestication challenges, licensing concerns — creates meaningful leverage that produces favorable outcomes. The funder’s cost of litigating in Florida against a represented business owner, facing a jury of Florida small business owners, often exceeds the discount the funder would accept in settlement. The economics of settlement favor the borrower when the borrower has credible legal claims.

Practical Steps

Assemble your documents: the MCA agreement, the personal guarantee, bank statements showing daily withdrawals, all communications with the funder and broker, any disclosures received, and any notices of default or collection activity. These documents are the raw material for every legal analysis and every negotiation strategy.

Calculate the effective annual percentage rate using the funded amount, the total repayment amount, and the repayment schedule. Compare the rate to Florida’s 18% civil and 25% criminal usury thresholds. If the rate exceeds either threshold, you have a statutory argument. If you are in default or approaching default, act before the funder does. A preemptive legal strategy — challenging the agreement, demanding reconciliation, negotiating from a position of knowledge — is more effective than responding after a lawsuit is filed or a bank account is frozen. Consult a Florida attorney experienced in MCA disputes to evaluate your options and develop a plan tailored to your specific situation and your specific agreement.