ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196

INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION · EUROPE

Extradition from Greece to the United States.

Extradition Treaty between the United States of America and Greece controls the request. The modernized treaty does not create an automatic nationality bar. The arrest clock and local review path decide what happens next.

Counsel working on the international federal record
FIG. - COUNSEL · THE GREECE FILE
WRITTEN BYTodd A. Spodek
LEGAL REVIEWAttorney review pending
RESEARCH VERIFIED2026-07-14

THE SHORT ANSWER

Treaty route in force.

In force. The 1931 bilateral treaty, as interpreted by a 1937 protocol, operates as modified by the U.S.-EU Extradition Agreement and the Greece implementing instrument, effective February 1, 2010. No reliable countrywide practical duration was located. Treaty provisional custody is keyed to 60 days, but contested proceedings and appeals can extend much longer.

TREATY ON THE RECORD

Extradition Treaty between the United States of America and Greece

Effective: 1932-11-01

Own nationals
The modernized treaty does not create an automatic nationality bar. Greek constitutional and statutory rules still govern execution, and nationality may matter in sentence-enforcement and competing-request analysis. A case-specific determination is required; citizenship is not a safe assumption of immunity.
Dual criminality
Required under the modernized framework: conduct must be punishable in both states by a maximum deprivation of liberty of more than one year. Labels and U.S. federal jurisdictional elements need not match.
Rule of specialty
The requesting state ordinarily may prosecute only offenses for which surrender was granted, same-facts qualifying or lesser offenses, post-surrender offenses, or offenses later consented to by Greece. Onward surrender likewise ordinarily needs consent.
Provisional arrest
In urgency, the United States may transmit a request through diplomatic channels or directly through designated justice authorities; Interpol channels may be used. The request identifies the person, location if known, facts, violated law, underlying warrant or conviction, and promises a formal request. The modern instrument uses a 60-day deadline for receipt of the formal request and supporting papers; later re-arrest remains possible.
Appeal path
Judicial rulings may be challenged through the Greek criminal-court hierarchy, including review by the Court of Cassation where the Code permits. Administrative or constitutional/human-rights remedies can arise depending on the decision challenged.

WHAT COUNSEL CHECKS FIRST

The active paper. The country. The clock.

Warrant or noticeCustody and location in GreeceHearing or filing deadlineLocal-counsel requirement

THE RESPONSE ROOM

What has to be established first.

CUSTODY · PAPERS · CLOCK · COUNSEL

01

FIRST HOURS

Identify the legal basis for custody

Record the arresting authority, court, case number, custody location, interpreter need, and any hearing date. Ask for counsel before discussing the foreign accusation.

02

WHO DECIDES

The local record controls

Greek authorities arrest under the treaty and Code of Criminal Procedure; a judicial council examines legal admissibility and treaty requirements. The competent executive authority then addresses surrender where required and coordinates transfer.

03

THE CLOCK

Deadlines are event-specific

In urgency, the United States may transmit a request through diplomatic channels or directly through designated justice authorities; Interpol channels may be used. The request identifies the person, location if known, facts, violated law, underlying warrant or conviction, and promises a formal request. The modern instrument uses a 60-day deadline for receipt of the formal request and supporting papers; later re-arrest remains possible. No reliable countrywide practical duration was located. Treaty provisional custody is keyed to 60 days, but contested proceedings and appeals can extend much longer.

04

DOCUMENT AUDIT

Build the file before the argument

Preserve the notice or warrant, charging papers, identity records, release terms, travel documents, medical records, and every dated communication. Do not alter or delete evidence.

FOR FAMILIES COORDINATING ACROSS BORDERS

Confirm the exact legal name, detention location, medication needs, next hearing, local lawyer, and one reliable contact channel. A consulate may assist with welfare and contact; it cannot cancel the local case.

Tell the intake team where the person is now →

02 · THE PROCESS

How the Greece process moves.

REQUEST · COURT · REVIEW · SURRENDER

Judicial and executive stages

Greek authorities arrest under the treaty and Code of Criminal Procedure; a judicial council examines legal admissibility and treaty requirements. The competent executive authority then addresses surrender where required and coordinates transfer.

Appeal and review

Judicial rulings may be challenged through the Greek criminal-court hierarchy, including review by the Court of Cassation where the Code permits. Administrative or constitutional/human-rights remedies can arise depending on the decision challenged.

Diagram separating judicial eligibility review from the executive surrender decision
FIG. - COURT CERTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE ACTION ARE DIFFERENT DECISIONS

03 · DEFENSES

The request still has to survive the record.

Put the papers in front of counsel →

ISSUE

Treaty coverage

The charged conduct, punishment threshold, documents, and identity must fit the controlling treaty and local implementing law.

ISSUE

Dual criminality

Required under the modernized framework: conduct must be punishable in both states by a maximum deprivation of liberty of more than one year. Labels and U.S. federal jurisdictional elements need not match.

ISSUE

Political and protected offenses

Political offenses and politically motivated requests may be refused, but treaty-defined violent and terrorism offenses are excluded from the political-offense category. Purely military offenses that are not ordinary crimes may be refused. Tax, customs, currency-control, import and export offenses are not excluded merely because the two systems use different taxes or controls. Final disposition for the same conduct, limitations rules, competing requests, and fundamental-rights obligations may affect surrender.

ISSUE

Evidence and process

The request can be tested against the treaty standard, authentication requirements, limitation rules, and procedural guarantees that apply locally.

ISSUE

Human rights and punishment

Greece has abolished capital punishment and is bound by the ECHR and EU fundamental-rights law. U.S. death-eligible cases require binding assurances that death will not be imposed or carried out. Courts must also address a substantiated real risk of torture, inhuman treatment, flagrantly unfair trial, or other non-refoulement violation.

ISSUE

Specialty and assurances

The requesting state ordinarily may prosecute only offenses for which surrender was granted, same-facts qualifying or lesser offenses, post-surrender offenses, or offenses later consented to by Greece. Onward surrender likewise ordinarily needs consent.

04 · PUBLIC EXAMPLES

Recent public extradition records.

GOVERNMENT RECORDS · NOT FIRM MATTERS

These examples come from public government records and are not presented as Spodek Law Group matters or results.

2024-08-12

Milan Dimitrov

Conspiracy to violate IEEPA and the Export Control Reform Act involving radiation-hardened microelectronics allegedly transshipped to Russia

United States

05 · THE CHARGES

What appears in the requests.

PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
Fraud and money laundering
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
Drug trafficking and conspiracy
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
Cybercrime and identity offenses
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
Violence and organized-crime charges

A Red Notice is not the extradition order.

A Red Notice asks police worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person, subject to each country's law. It is not an international arrest warrant, and it does not replace the treaty papers or the local extradition case.

The notice, the provisional-arrest request, and the surrender proceeding are separate records. Each can carry different defects, deadlines, and remedies.

Read the Red Notice file →

07 · THIRD-COUNTRY RISK

A new border changes the law. It does not erase the file.

Transit can expose a person to another country's arrest rules, immigration powers, or provisional request. This page gives no route or evasion advice. Review the actual warrant, notice, release conditions, and jurisdictions with counsel before travel.

08 · QUESTIONS

What families and targets ask first.

FULL ANSWERS · SOURCE REVIEWED

IMMEDIATE EXTRADITION QUESTIONS

It can. Border screening may expose a national warrant, INTERPOL data, immigration authority, or a provisional request under another country's law. This is not travel or evasion advice; the actual records and jurisdictions require review before travel.

AUTHORITIESwww.interpol.int

COUNTRY PROCEDURE

Yes. A bilateral treaty remains in force as modernized by the U.S.-EU agreement.

AUTHORITIESwww.state.gov

09 · RESEARCH LIMITS

What the public record does not settle.

NO FACTS INVENTED TO CLOSE THE GAP

Open item 01
The State Department PDF endpoint returned a technical-access error during verification; the official URL and February 1, 2010 entry-into-force date are corroborated by State/DOJ treaty materials.
Open item 02
No authoritative aggregate practical timeline or four additional recent completed Greece-to-U.S. cases was located.

10 · SOURCES

Every material claim should have a file behind it.

VERIFIED 2026-07-14

U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of Justice
Todd A. Spodek at the conference table
FIG. - TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNER

WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

Start with the paper, the posture, and the first deadline.

Todd A. Spodek leads the firm's federal defense work. The team identifies the active U.S. matter, the country and custody posture, and where appropriately licensed local counsel is required. No webpage can replace review of the actual request.

Todd Spodek - biography and record →

SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Put the actual extradition record in front of counsel.

Tell us whether this is an inquiry, Red Notice, detention, hearing, or appeal. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. Urgent custody and hearing matters should call.

212 300 5196 - urgent matters →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIREDCALL FOR URGENT MATTERS
01
02
03
04
05
06
07

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. The firm must first complete a conflict check and agree to the representation.