ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196

INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION · EUROPE

Extradition from Germany to the United States.

Treaty Concerning Extradition (1978), 1986 Supplementary Treaty, and 2006 Second Supplementary Treaty controls the request. Germany generally does not extradite German nationals to non-EU states because Basic Law Article 16(2) allows statutory exceptions only for EU member states or international courts. The arrest clock and local review path decide what happens next.

Counsel working on the international federal record
FIG. - COUNSEL · THE GERMANY FILE
WRITTEN BYTodd A. Spodek
LEGAL REVIEWAttorney review pending
RESEARCH VERIFIED2026-07-14

THE SHORT ANSWER

Treaty route in force.

In force No official standard duration. Complexity, constitutional litigation, asylum issues and assurances can materially extend proceedings.

TREATY ON THE RECORD

Treaty Concerning Extradition (1978), 1986 Supplementary Treaty, and 2006 Second Supplementary Treaty

Effective: 1980-08-29; 1993-03-11; second supplement 2010-02-01

Own nationals
Germany generally does not extradite German nationals to non-EU states because Basic Law Article 16(2) allows statutory exceptions only for EU member states or international courts. Non-Germans and dual nationals require fact-specific nationality analysis.
Dual criminality
Yes; the conduct must be criminal in both states and meet the treaty penalty threshold.
Rule of specialty
Yes, subject to consent and the treaty's exceptions.
Provisional arrest
Available in urgency through diplomatic or direct justice-ministry channels. Article 16 terminates provisional arrest if the formal request and documents are not received within 40 days, but the requesting state may obtain an extension of up to 20 additional days; later extradition is not barred.
Appeal path
There is ordinarily no conventional appeal from the Higher Regional Court's admissibility ruling, but renewed review and a constitutional complaint to the Federal Constitutional Court may be available; ECHR interim relief is exceptional.

WHAT COUNSEL CHECKS FIRST

The active paper. The country. The clock.

Warrant or noticeCustody and location in GermanyHearing or filing deadlineLocal-counsel requirement

THE RESPONSE ROOM

What has to be established first.

CUSTODY · PAPERS · CLOCK · COUNSEL

01

FIRST HOURS

Identify the legal basis for custody

Record the arresting authority, court, case number, custody location, interpreter need, and any hearing date. Ask for counsel before discussing the foreign accusation.

02

WHO DECIDES

The local record controls

The Federal Office of Justice/Foreign Office and state justice authorities handle incoming requests. A Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) decides admissibility; the competent executive authority then decides whether surrender will be granted.

03

THE CLOCK

Deadlines are event-specific

Available in urgency through diplomatic or direct justice-ministry channels. Article 16 terminates provisional arrest if the formal request and documents are not received within 40 days, but the requesting state may obtain an extension of up to 20 additional days; later extradition is not barred. No official standard duration. Complexity, constitutional litigation, asylum issues and assurances can materially extend proceedings.

04

DOCUMENT AUDIT

Build the file before the argument

Preserve the notice or warrant, charging papers, identity records, release terms, travel documents, medical records, and every dated communication. Do not alter or delete evidence.

FOR FAMILIES COORDINATING ACROSS BORDERS

Confirm the exact legal name, detention location, medication needs, next hearing, local lawyer, and one reliable contact channel. A consulate may assist with welfare and contact; it cannot cancel the local case.

Tell the intake team where the person is now →

02 · THE PROCESS

How the Germany process moves.

REQUEST · COURT · REVIEW · SURRENDER

Judicial and executive stages

The Federal Office of Justice/Foreign Office and state justice authorities handle incoming requests. A Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) decides admissibility; the competent executive authority then decides whether surrender will be granted.

Appeal and review

There is ordinarily no conventional appeal from the Higher Regional Court's admissibility ruling, but renewed review and a constitutional complaint to the Federal Constitutional Court may be available; ECHR interim relief is exceptional.

Diagram separating judicial eligibility review from the executive surrender decision
FIG. - COURT CERTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE ACTION ARE DIFFERENT DECISIONS

03 · DEFENSES

The request still has to survive the record.

Put the papers in front of counsel →

ISSUE

Treaty coverage

The charged conduct, punishment threshold, documents, and identity must fit the controlling treaty and local implementing law.

ISSUE

Dual criminality

Yes; the conduct must be criminal in both states and meet the treaty penalty threshold.

ISSUE

Political and protected offenses

Political and purely military offenses are excluded; specified terrorism/violent offenses are not treated as political. Modern treaty rules prevent a blanket fiscal-offense exception. Limitation and prior-jeopardy rules can apply.

ISSUE

Evidence and process

The request can be tested against the treaty standard, authentication requirements, limitation rules, and procedural guarantees that apply locally.

ISSUE

Human rights and punishment

Germany has no death penalty. Capital exposure normally requires binding assurances. Article 1 and 2 Basic Law, ECHR Articles 3 and 6, prison conditions, health and risk of irreducible life imprisonment may be raised, but are case-specific.

ISSUE

Specialty and assurances

Yes, subject to consent and the treaty's exceptions.

04 · PUBLIC EXAMPLES

Recent public extradition records.

GOVERNMENT RECORDS · NOT FIRM MATTERS

These examples come from public government records and are not presented as Spodek Law Group matters or results.

2026

Dominik Rydz

Michigan criminal sexual conduct and unlawful imprisonment

United States

05 · THE CHARGES

What appears in the requests.

PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
cybercrime and ransomware
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
fraud and money laundering
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
antitrust offenses
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
terrorism/material support
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
state violent-crime charges

A Red Notice is not the extradition order.

A Red Notice asks police worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person, subject to each country's law. It is not an international arrest warrant, and it does not replace the treaty papers or the local extradition case.

The notice, the provisional-arrest request, and the surrender proceeding are separate records. Each can carry different defects, deadlines, and remedies.

Read the Red Notice file →

07 · THIRD-COUNTRY RISK

A new border changes the law. It does not erase the file.

Transit can expose a person to another country's arrest rules, immigration powers, or provisional request. This page gives no route or evasion advice. Review the actual warrant, notice, release conditions, and jurisdictions with counsel before travel.

08 · QUESTIONS

What families and targets ask first.

FULL ANSWERS · SOURCE REVIEWED

IMMEDIATE EXTRADITION QUESTIONS

It can. Border screening may expose a national warrant, INTERPOL data, immigration authority, or a provisional request under another country's law. This is not travel or evasion advice; the actual records and jurisdictions require review before travel.

AUTHORITIESwww.interpol.int

COUNTRY PROCEDURE

Yes. Treaty Concerning Extradition (1978), 1986 Supplementary Treaty, and 2006 Second Supplementary Treaty is in force; the stated effective date is 1980-08-29; 1993-03-11; second supplement 2010-02-01. Always verify treaty status with the U.S. State Department/Office of International Affairs for a live case.

AUTHORITIESwww.govinfo.govwww.govinfo.gov

Todd A. Spodek at the conference table
FIG. - TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNER

WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

Start with the paper, the posture, and the first deadline.

Todd A. Spodek leads the firm's federal defense work. The team identifies the active U.S. matter, the country and custody posture, and where appropriately licensed local counsel is required. No webpage can replace review of the actual request.

Todd Spodek - biography and record →

SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Put the actual extradition record in front of counsel.

Tell us whether this is an inquiry, Red Notice, detention, hearing, or appeal. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. Urgent custody and hearing matters should call.

212 300 5196 - urgent matters →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIREDCALL FOR URGENT MATTERS
01
02
03
04
05
06
07

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. The firm must first complete a conflict check and agree to the representation.