ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
FEDERAL PRACTICE / USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS / USDA SNAP RETAILER TRAFFICKING LAWYERS
4 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS · TOPIC GUIDE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

USDA SNAP retailer trafficking lawyers.

Part of the USDA SNAP violation defense library for retail store owners - charge letters, disqualification, civil money penalties, and appeals.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

If you are a retailer who participates in SNAP, you know how valuable this program is to your business. As more people rely on SNAP benefits, this has become an essential part of helping your business grow. But as you know, participating in SNAP brings with it state and federal rules and regulations that must be strictly followed by yourself and your employees. Should you or your employees deviate from established guidelines and choose to engage in forbidden practices regarding SNAP benefits, you could find yourself charged with food stamp fraud and trafficking. If this happens, you could potentially be the subject of fines and the permanent disqualification of your business from being a participating SNAP retailer. If you are facing trafficking allegations, it is best to rely on an experienced SNAP retailer trafficking attorney who understands the nuances of these complex cases.

What is the Definition of Trafficking?

To be charged with trafficking, a retailer must be willing to allow customers to exchange their SNAP benefits for cash or other items, which sometimes includes guns or illegal drugs. Whatever the case may be, the practice is considered to be illegal and is taken very seriously by the federal government and its investigators. When you are charged with trafficking, do not assume the charges will be dropped in a matter of days or weeks. By procrastinating, you are simply allowing government investigators to build a stronger case against you. Instead, be proactive and hire the services of a skilled SNAP retailer trafficking attorney immediately to handle your case.

How is Trafficking Detected?

In most cases where allegations of SNAP retailer trafficking are made, it is done so after the USDA has relied on undercover investigators to visit a store and attempt to conduct illegal business with the store owner or employees. In fact, thousands of stores are investigated across the United States, with hundreds or more being hit with sanctions ranging from fines to license suspensions or disqualification from SNAP. But prior to these undercover investigations taking place, the USDA often relies on data analysis from the EBT Retailer Transaction system, which allows for monitoring of all EBT transactions and can detect patterns of unusual purchases at certain stores. If you are under investigation for alleged SNAP trafficking, do not allow investigators to convince you they have an open-and-shut case against you. Instead, go on the offensive and immediately consult with a SNAP retailer trafficking attorney who can evaluate the charges against you and advise you of possible legal options.

Trafficking Charge Letter

Once the government has decided you may have committed SNAP retailer trafficking at your store, there is a good chance you will receive a letter in the mail that you should pay close attention to immediately. Known as a trafficking charge letter, this will outline the charges against you and probably include pages containing lists of transactions that the USDA has called into question. However, it is crucial to remember that just because you have received this letter, this does not mean you have been found guilty of the charges. Since mistakes can be commonplace within the large realms of federal government, it is entirely possible any transactions listed in your charge letter may in fact be perfectly legitimate or possibly should not even be attributed to your store. In any case, while you will be upset at having received this letter, do not lose hope. Instead, take this letter with you when you consult with an experienced SNAP retailer trafficking attorney who is determined to fight hard to protect your rights.

Responding to the Charges

Once you receive a charge letter, you will need to develop a plan very quickly regarding your response. Since the USDA only allows you 10 days to respond to the letter, immediately speak with your SNAP retailer trafficking attorney as to what you should do next. If you wait too long and thus exceed the 10-day window to respond, the USDA will in all likelihood move to suspend or permanently revoke your store's license to participate in SNAP. Therefore, whether or not you may actually be guilty of the allegations made against you, work closely with your lawyer to develop a legal strategy that will ensure you and your store stay in business once the situation is resolved.

Administrative and Judicial Reviews

At the beginning, the USDA will conduct an administrative review of the charges made against you and render a decision regarding your participation in SNAP. If you are unhappy with the decision of the administrative review, you can appeal to the USDA for a review of the decision. If the ruling is upheld, you will then need to move on to filing a judicial review. To do this, you will need an attorney who is familiar with this process, since this will take place in U.S. District Court. Ultimately, your case could go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, although this is very unlikely. Nevertheless, do not be afraid to do whatever is necessary to clear your name and keep your business up and running.

While taking on the federal government can be a daunting task, it is not one that is not winnable under the right circumstances. If you are accused of SNAP retailer trafficking, do not be scared. Instead, meet with a food stamp trafficking attorney who will work with you to win your case.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.