ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
FEDERAL PRACTICE / USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS / SNAP VIOLATION: EXPERT SNAP DISQUALIFICATION
4 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS · TOPIC GUIDE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

SNAP Violation: Expert SNAP Disqualification Defense.

Part of the USDA SNAP violation defense library for retail store owners - charge letters, disqualification, civil money penalties, and appeals.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

In the grocery store or other similar business you own or manage, many customers use EBT benefits to pay for various types of foods. As you know, EBT benefits are to be used only for food, and not other items found in your store. However, this does not stop customers or even store employees from making these transactions possible. When this occurs, a SNAP violation has taken place, and could have significant consequences for you and your business for many years. When violations of this nature are alleged against a business, the USDA and its investigators set out to make examples of these alleged offenders by implementing certain types of disqualifications, meaning your business cannot accept EBT benefits for a certain period of time or perhaps forever. Rather than let your case be handled by lawyers who rarely deal with such cases, put your trust in expert SNAP disqualification defense attorneys.

SNAP Trafficking

In most situations where a disqualification penalty is imposed by the USDA, SNAP trafficking has been the primary reason for the penalty. If you are accused of this violation, this means the USDA believes you have exchanged EBT benefits with customers for cash, weapons, or drugs. Needless to say, this can bring about serious charges in a number of areas, meaning you will need expert legal representation as fast as possible. To prove SNAP trafficking took place at your business, the USDA will either point to its analysis of your store's EBT transactions or to evidence obtained during the course of an undercover investigation at your store. While this may sound as if the evidence against you will be overwhelming, don't assume this is the case. In fact, an experienced SNAP disqualification defense attorney can often find errors made by the USDA that can impact your case, ultimately helping you avoid the disqualification penalty.

Not All Disqualifications are Permanent

When you receive a Charge Letter from the USDA detailing your violations and discussing the possibility of a disqualification from SNAP, you may initially think this disqualification will be permanent. While that is always a possibility, these severe penalties are generally reserved for those businesses that are found to be guilty of trafficking. In many cases, you may be facing a six-month suspension for minor violations, such as selling food-related products such as plastic utensils and cups. However, should you let alcohol, clothing, gasoline, or other similar items be purchased with EBT benefits, these violations could carry a disqualification of up to five years. If this occurs, the financial impact will be so severe that it could result in you selling your business or watching the store where you have worked for years close its doors. To prevent these scenarios, you will need to fight the charges against you very aggressively, which is why you will require the services of expert SNAP disqualification defense attorneys.

Once Permanently Disqualified, There's No Going Back

Should your SNAP violations be so severe that the USDA is successful in imposing a permanent disqualification against you and your store, there will be no going back to how things were prior to the penalty. In fact, the USDA will see to it that you feel the impact of the permanent disqualification penalty for many years to come. To begin with, the store where the violations took place will never again be allowed to accept EBT benefits, and you will no longer be able to hold any position of authority in any type of business that does accept EBT from customers. Also, don't expect to get a job with any company that conducts government business, and plan on having a much harder time getting approval for business or personal loans. Since the USDA considers these situations to be non-negotiable, you must rely on expert SNAP disqualification attorneys to provide you with a strong legal defense. Otherwise, you may be facing a very uncertain future.

The Responsibility is Yours

Should it be shown that SNAP violations took place at your business, they may have occurred not because of errors you made, but because other employees failed to understand certain SNAP rules and regulations. While you may think this will play in your favor, it will not. According to the USDA, even if others were responsible for SNAP violations at your store, you as the store's manager or owner are ultimately held responsible for their actions. Therefore, it will do you no good to immediately start blaming others when speaking to USDA investigators or replying to a Charge Letter. Since the government will give you no more than 10 days in which to appeal its decision, don't waste your time trying to shift the blame to others. Instead, schedule an immediate meeting with expert SNAP disqualification lawyers who can examine the details of your case, explain various ways in which it may play out, and advise you as to what you should say and do over the coming weeks while your case works its way through the legal system.

The Appeals Process

Once you begin appealing the USDA's charges against you, it is likely the process will begin with an Administrative Appeal, which may take several weeks or longer to complete. Should the matter not be resolved through this option, it will then shift to a Judicial Appeal which will be heard in court. If you try to represent yourself during these proceedings, you will undoubtedly lose. By choosing instead to hire experienced legal counsel, you give yourself a far better chance of avoiding disqualification and the numerous consequences that follow.

To have your case handled by attorneys who know how to take on the federal government and win, consult soon with expert SNAP disqualification defense attorneys.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.