ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
FEDERAL PRACTICE / USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS / SNAP DISQUALIFICATION RETAILER DEFENSE
4 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS · TOPIC GUIDE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

SNAP Disqualification Retailer Defense.

Part of the USDA SNAP violation defense library for retail store owners - charge letters, disqualification, civil money penalties, and appeals.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

SNAP DISQUALIFICATION RETAILER DEFENSE

The purpose of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is to help low-income citizens afford nutritious food for their household. These benefits, however, can only be used at authorized grocery stores, gas stations and convenience stores for the purchase of eligible food items thus, bringing in a significant amount of revenue.

Therefore, to avoid disqualification from (SNAP) the retailer must take all necessary precautions. In order to manage such a case successfully you need to be well prepared and organized. Permanent disqualification is a serious matter for any retail business. Its consequences have a long lasting impact on the business and the owner. It brings financial loss as well as damage to the retailer’s reputation even if the store is sold afterwards the retailer receives a Transfer Civil Money Penalty (TCMP). Therefore, it is important to always consult your lawyer about all your business moves in advance to avoid costly mistakes.

Types of SNAP violations

The most common form of violations include:

• Food stamp trafficking. That is accepting EBT benefits for items such as cigarettes, alcohol and various household supplies or cosmetics since only some items are eligible for SNAP benefits. Pre-prepared foods, ready-to-eat food are not eligible under SNAP regulations.

• Trafficking in SNAP benefits includes exchanging for cash, giving back cash change. This may be in the form of cash back on a SNAP purchase or the sale or purchase of an EBT card.

• Credit payment or inventory purchases with EBT benefits

• Reciprocal disqualifications from Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

Such activities occur for numerous reasons. Employees themselves may be buying and selling EBT benefits to earn extra cash. Others did not have all the required training as to avoid costly mistakes. These can be prevented with training and a thorough compliance policy.

What to watch out for

USDA will take action and enforce a ‘Charge Letter’ upon noticing some suspicious transactions. Some may be:

• A large number of manual transactions with EBT card as an indication of fraud use of EBT cards and PINS.

• Repeated “same-cent transactions” that is number of transactions of the same value although it may be due to the sales of the store

• If in a long term the amount of EBT card transactions do not balance with the accounts of food items sold

• Spending of practically all the SNAP benefits within a short time at one particular store

• Repeated transactions by the same household in short period of time

Charge Letter

When such inconsistencies come to light and especially, if they are repeated then USDA issues the “charge letter”, sent by the Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) agents, outlining the allegations against you. It's important to take action as soon as possible upon receiving the letter. You must respond within 10 days of the date that you received it. Otherwise, the USDA will disqualify you for EBT transactions. You should protect your business by taking strategic action following your lawyer’s consultation. The allegations presented in the letter are drawn after careful consideration of all the transaction patterns and available data. It is clearly stated in the FNS letter there is “compiled evidence that your firm has violated the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) regulations. USDA is not flexible when violations have occurred they are determined to grant you a permanent disqualification. Avoiding a permanent disqualification is not an easy case. You must act immediately because you have very little time. Consult your lawyer, find out what needs to be explained based on the evidence they have. Compile all the necessary documents, written data, records, etc. all the solid evidence that is required. It is vital to provide them with the specific documents and correct responses expected in order to defend your case successfully. Your lawyer wull be of great assistance to manage all this.

Knowing the Consequences

A permanent disqualification may mean the end of your business and your credit history. You lose your EBT authorization that resulting in valuable loss of revenue. But it is not only the financial loss for your business, you personally will suffer and your reputation will too. You will be excluded from the System for Awards Management list (SAM). It will be extremely difficult to get a job that deals with the federal government, to get a bank loan, and good credit history. You will not be able to sell or transfer your store, at any time in the future you will receive the TCMP (Transfer Civil Money Penalty) which you will eventually have to pay.

Taking all into consideration, stay vigilant, avoid at all means permanent disqualification. The best way to defend your case successfully is with the assistance of an experienced lawyer on SNAP issues

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.