ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
FEDERAL PRACTICE / USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS / SNAP APPEAL ATTORNEY - REVERSE
4 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
USDA SNAP VIOLATIONS · TOPIC GUIDE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

SNAP Appeal Attorney - Reverse Your Disqualification.

Part of the USDA SNAP violation defense library for retail store owners - charge letters, disqualification, civil money penalties, and appeals.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

There are many programs administered by the federal government. One of the most important is what is known formally as SNAP. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is also known to many grocery store owners and users as food stamps. These payments are all about helping people feed their families. One of the many things that is true about SNAP is that it requires the help of retailers to make it work.

Grocery store owners can apply to the federal government to participate in this program and accept payments. In doing so, they are entrusted with making sure the program is used as intended by recipients. The decision to accept food stamps as a form of payment has lots of advantages. It opens up a whole new world of clients who can now pay their personal food bills. At the same time, there are certain issues that can arise when agreeing to take such payments. Many of the rules that govern food stamp use are complicated.

Federal Oversight

In order to make sure that food stamps are being used as intended, the federal government has set up a process where they examine the grocery stores where they are used directly. This process typically means that someone will visit your store to make sure no one is violating any laws governing food stamp use there. Given how complex the use of SNAP payments can be, in many instances a grocery store owner or their employee can make minor mistakes when it comes to enforcing rules onsite. Any violation of SNAP rules carries with it potentially serious penalties.

If a violation of any kind is noted by the inspector, they will begin to take action. For example, they will send out what is known as a USDA letter. This not an ordinary letter. The letter indicates that the government believes something is amiss in your store and they have the evidence to back up this assertion. The letter can indicate all sorts of potential penalties that may follow in the aftermath of such allegations. For example, you may have your EBT Retailer application denied. The letter can also indicate that a grocery store owner is facing a suspension from the program. The letter can indicate exactly how long this suspension is expected to last. That can range from a few weeks, six months or even many years. The letter may also indicate a much larger program. For example, the feds may be trying to permanently disqualify the store owner from owning a store that participates in this program or even being part of such a store by working as a manager for another person.

A Serious Issue

On the surface, this letter sounds very scary. That is because it is a very serious issue. At the same time, just because the federal government has evidence does not mean that such charges will stick. Even if you have been disqualified from accepting SNAP payments, that does not mean the verdict is final. In many cases, it is possible to find help. A store owner can have a skilled attorney on their side. The lawyer can help them develop a strategy to respond to such allegations. They can also help them appeal these allegations and get right back in business. It is important to have an attorney who knows the program and understands how to work it and with their retail clients.

Acting Quickly

Acting as fast as possible is imperative. Once the federal government sends out a letter of this kind, this means they are making plans to get you out of the program for at least a short period. The letter may also indicate a total disqualification is in the works. Any letter should be read carefully and closely. All such letters are sent via certified mail. This means the government is trying to get your attention. They want you to be aware they think you are violating the law. A store owner typically has only ten days in which to respond to any letter about potential misuse of food stamp payments. Keep in mind there are steps you can take right now. You can reach to a lawyer who will expect your options to you and come up with a plan to dispute these charges.

Your attorney will ask for what is known as an administrative review. This is a process that allows any retailer to ask for a greater examination of the charges. An administrative review applies to any kind of SNAP penalties including a temporary suspension as well as any fines for selling items not allowed under the terms of the program. All retailer store owners should also understand that any kind of temporary suspension from this program can ultimately turn into a much longer disqualification period. Any kind of disqualification, even for a few weeks, can severely impact your business and make it harder to function in the long run. This can lead to a massive loss of revenues that can make it hard to stay in business.

This is why you need to act quickly as doing so can impede your ability to participate in a large program that many people rely on to feed their families. A retailer who is unable to part of the SNAP program can find it very hard to serve a significant percentage of their client base. All grocery store owners should also keep in mind that in many instances, the feds may react in haste. Any sort of penalty of this kind should be fought. The attorney will work closely with you to examine all of your records and see exactly what kind of allegations have been made.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.