ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · SAN JOSE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

San Jose SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

Many retailers who accept EBT at their grocery stores are vulnerable when it comes to receiving a SNAP violation notice from the federal government. These come in the form of several page documents from the USDA informing you of certain transactions that have occurred at your grocery store recently that have reportedly violated one or more of the general SNAP rules.

These rules can include any of the following:

• Your store has been suspected of fraudulently accepting SNAP benefits on the part of your customers

• Your store has been found to have accepted SNAP benefits in exchange for items these benefits are not intended for, including alcohol or tobacco as well as other products

• Your store has allowed customers to redeem more EBT stamps than actually needed for their food items at time of purchase

• Your store has allowed customers to redeem SNAP benefits who are not supposed to be eligible to redeem these benefits

• The documents submitted by your store on its EBT application is believed to be falsified either partially or entirely

Responding to one of these notices from the USDA promptly is crucial if you have any hope of fighting it. Your store is only given ten days from the day you receive this notice to take any type of action against it. The ultimate goal of the USDA contacting you by issuing this notice is to revoke your store’s ability to accept EBT benefits, which in turn can directly impact the number of customers you are able to appeal to in your area.

The best choice for your business is to contact a lawyer who can take over all of the communication between the USDA in regards to your store’s response to their notice. Once this response has been filed with the USDA, they may very well still determine that your store has been in violation of the SNAP rules and policies. If this happens, it will be on the part of your lawyer to, again, reply within ten days with an official notice stating that you plan to appeal the USDA’s verdict. Your lawyer will compile any appropriate evidence and will put together what is called an appellate brief that will be used to build your case against the USDA’s decision.

In certain cases, the USDA may stand firm enough that this can lead to your case being taken to the local Federal Court where it will be treated just like a normal court case, resulting in a trial and everything. This is just another reason why it can be so important to contact a lawyer immediately when faced with a SNAP violation notice from the USDA.

As stated before, responding promptly to one of these SNAP violation notices is crucial if your store wants to stand a fighting chance of overcoming the ruling made by the USDA in regards to your SNAP policy. Hefty fines are in place by the USDA in order to try to curb any violations from happening. One practice they usually stand behind is ensuring that a storeowner has a policy for accepting EBT cards as a form of payment in place in their store or business. This compliance policy must be in effect and posted at the time the USDA’s allegations were filed. If they find that it was not and that it were, say, drafted after the violations occurred, the USDA’s case is that much stronger against you and your store.

Losing the ability to accept EBT cards can be detrimental to your business. The SNAP program provides families with money to be used on groceries and food each month. They are provided with a card that is loaded with a certain amount of money that is predetermined based on their individual eligibility. Many families rely on this as their main form of payment when it comes to their general grocery shopping, and therefore your store’s ability to accept it is integral to your success in certain markets.

EBT cards replaced the traditional food stamps in the 1990s and the program is now operated on a federal level with each card being issued in the recipient’s registered state. The money placed on the user’s card is intended only for grocery purchases, and is never meant to be used for cash back purposes, which is often one of the ways a violation may fall upon your store.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.