ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · RALEIGH
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Raleigh SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

SNAP, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, is a federally-run program that provides supplemental nutrition benefits to those who meet age, income, and/or disability requirements. Beneficiaries are provided with an electronic benefit transfer, or EBT, card that looks like a debit card and can be used to pay for food items only; it replaced the food stamp program of the 1990's. EBT cards are issued by the state the beneficiary lives in, even though it's a federally-run program.

Any retailer who has been approved by the federal government as a qualified retailer can accept EBT cards. SNAP benefits are to be used for food and non-alcoholic beverages only, they are not to be used for cash back, tobacco products, or alcohol.

SNAP Program Fraud

Unfortunately, the program is inherently open to fraudulent transactions or allegations of fraud, which are prosecuted by the federal government.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA uses data mining and algorithms in conjunction with local police cooperation to uncover EBT abuse. When a retailer is suspected of one or more SNAP violations, he or she will receive a letter from the USDA along with pages of alleged infractions. It's up to the retailer to refute or affirm the validity of the allegations. Violations can include:

  • Application falsification
  • Benefit theft
  • Fraudulently accepting EBT
  • Giving cash back on EBT
  • Illegally accepting EBT from a non-qualified purchaser
  • Submitting more EBT receipts than total store sales
  • Use of EBT for prohibited items

Violation Letters

Retailers who have received a notice of SNAP violation from the USDA should immediately contact an attorney who specializes in defending against SNAP Violations. Notices of violation can appear with or without warning. The retailer need not be aware of any intentional violations, but this type of letter is the first notice that the USDA intends to remove the merchant's ability to accept EBT. Typically, there will be several pages of documentation attached to the letter. These pages will detail the transactions that are allegedly fraudulent and will usually specify the violations alleged.

A response is usually required within ten days of receipt of the letter of violation, so it's imperative to obtain legal representation immediately. Failure to respond can have dire consequences.

After receiving the merchant's response to its notice of violation, the USDA may conclude the matter or they may decide to pursue further action. If further action will be forthcoming, the merchant will receive another letter stating their intentions, which can include legal action, suspension of their ability to accept EBT, or other action that the USDA deems necessary.

As in the case of the first notice, the merchant will have ten days to respond to the second notice from the USDA. This response may include reasons for the USDA to amend or invalidate its previous ruling against the merchant, or it may include other information. Either way, it's essential to respond to all notices received from the USDA. Failure to respond may invalidate some of the merchant's rights with the USDA.

The USDA may, at its option, refuse to amend its decision. If such is the case, additional legal action can be taken up to and including a trial. Although these are routine matters to skilled attorneys, a merchant shouldn't undertake them without legal representation.

Legal Representation For SNAP Violations

Our law firm has more than 50 years of experience in representing merchants who have received letters of SNAP violation from the USDA. We know that the multitude of rules and regulations governing the SNAP program are complex and sometimes difficult to interpret. Sometimes, a retailer is unaware that he or she has committed a violation of the SNAP program rules. The degree of the fine and the length of the suspension can vary depending upon the degree of involvement of the merchant's principal parties. For this reason alone, you need to have a reputable, experienced law firm representing you.

Our decades of experience in federal defense make us the law firm you need if you've received a notice of violation. We have offices nationwide, so if you have receive a notice of violation, you shouldn't waste any time contacting our office.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.