ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · PORTLAND
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Portland SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

The SNAP program is the single most important pillar of the anti-poverty safety net for the most disadvantaged U.S. citizens and children. The first food assistance programs, also known as food stamp programs, were started under Franklin Roosevelt's administration. But the modern food assistance program, which is administered under the U.S. Department of Agriculture, wasn't brought into existence until Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty.

Today, the most recent incarnation of the nation's food safety net, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, for short, is a multi-billion dollar means of making sure that America's most vulnerable don't slip into abject poverty and malnutrition. With more than 42 million Americans relying on the program to make their nutritional ends meet, no other social welfare program in the United States today has a more direct and effective impact on maintaining the U.S. population free from the most acute forms of poverty.

A fiercely protected system brings collateral damage

As a result of the SNAP program being the flagship anti-poverty program within the United States, it is fiercely protected by both the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the court systems. Unfortunately, the zealous policing of any abuses of the SNAP program often lead to innocent store owners being caught in the enforcement net.

The number of regulations and rules that stores that have been authorized to accept EBT cards, the electronic benefits cards used to distribute SNAP benefits, have been expanding in both scope and complexity. If you are a SNAP-accepting store owner, you should be aware that the government views it as being the sole responsibility of the store owners to ensure compliance at all times, even among the store's employees. All too frequently, store owners find themselves facing serious sanctions from the federal government as a direct result of the the actions taken by rogue employees.

In a typical year, the USDA has over 100 analysts, investigators and processors working, year round, on flushing out violations of current SNAP laws and regulations. In a typical year, over 15,000 stores are reviewed and more than 4,000 are fined or the owners taken to court and convicted of both criminal and civil infractions in their abuse of the SNAP program or violations of rules relating to it. In hundreds of cases, store owners are sentenced to lengthy terms of incarceration and made to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and restitution.

For this reason, if you find yourself under the scrutiny of the USDA and its Food and Nutrition Service arm, it is absolutely imperative that you get in touch with a competent lawyer who understands the process and has the experience needed to help ensure you take the necessary steps to maximize your chances of a favorable outcome.

If you have received a letter from the USDA alleging violations of the SNAP program, you will only have 10 days to respond. Should you fail to do so, the USDA has absolute authority to immediately cut off your store from the program. For many urban food retailers, this could be a business-ending event. It is, therefore, imperative that you respond quickly and without error.

Our law firm has handled hundreds of cases on behalf of store owners accused of various forms of SNAP program violations. The most common of these tend to be less serious offenses, such as failing to comply with stocking requirements or allowing ineligible items to be purchased. More serious are allegation involving the trafficking of food benefits, that is, selling food stamp benefits for cash or otherwise trading in the non-negotiable benefits. It is important to know what types of allegations you are facing in order to properly respond and mount a defense that is most likely to succeed.

It is always best to get a competent lawyer fighting on your side as early in the process as possible. Because of the limited time frame available to contest USDA allegations of SNAP violations, the sooner you hire an expert lawyer, the higher the likelihood that you will prevail.

Our lawyers have successfully resolved hundreds of cases of SNAP abuse, fraud and non-compliance allegations on behalf of our store-owning clients. Make sure you don't fall victim to overzealous FNS enforcement. Give us a call today.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.