ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · PITTSBURGH
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Pittsburgh SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program costs the taxpayers billions every year. This is why Congress does not take violations lightly. In 2013, a report was tabled highlighting the dramatic rise in SNAP violations. In response to this, the government issued a crackdown that led to the suspension of thousands of stores across the country. The US department has not relented in its efforts to convict and disqualify families and store owners found to be in violation.

If you have received a charge letter, you should not take it lightly. The department has the technology and manpower to investigate and prosecute offenders. If you are contemplating on whether you should hire an attorney, understanding the investigation process and the benefits of an attorney will help you make an informed decision.

SNAP fraud investigations

SNAP beneficiaries are issued with an Electronic Benefits Transfer Card (EBT). This card is what the USDA uses to monitor the transactions. An investigation into you or your store can be triggered by an inconsistent transaction. The USDA has also issued hotline numbers for members of the public to report any violations. The quality control department also has the technology, and a computer match in their system can also trigger an investigation. Once the department identifies an inconsistency, they may contact you to obtain information. They may also ask or conduct a financial audit of your store. If you report low income and you are able to meet your monthly obligations as a store owner, then this can be grounds for an investigation.

The USDA investigations department is well connected with other government agencies. In their investigations, they may coordinate with other government agencies to obtain information. They also work closely with the prisons office. If a SNAP beneficiary goes to jail, then the department receives an alert. As is evident, they have a watertight system to help in investigations.

In some cases, the USDA can also carry out undercover investigations. They can pose as beneficiaries and try to buy other items that are not authorized. There are many ways that you can be found in violation. In some cases, the violation may be an error on your part. Again, as a business owner, you may not be aware that your employees are engaging in violations. This is why it is best to have legal expertise.

How can a SNAP violation lawyer help?

Once the USDA finds that there are irregularities, they will issue a charge letter. This letter can be issued without any warnings. The charge letter provides information about the allegations made against you. In most cases, the letter is detailed containing the facts of the allegations. Once you receive the letter, you need to issue a response in not more than 10 days. It is best to bring in a lawyer immediately you receive this letter. The lawyer will review the facts and the merits of the case made against you. The SNAP lawyer will also take over all communications done between you and the USDA investigators. More importantly, the lawyer will draft a response within the stipulated 10 days. The response will be thorough and extensive. On your own, you may lack the legal expertise needed to make an accurate and detailed response.

The department will review the response letter and compare it with their findings. If they still hold their grounds, they will communicate this in a second letter. This letter will also detail their intentions to disqualify or suspend you from the program. The USDA still expects a response to the second letter within 10 days. Failure to make a response can be viewed as an admission of guilt. If you retain a lawyer, he will gather evidence and make an appeal based on case law and other federal codes. The lawyer will also issue a letter demonstrating that the decision of the department is wrong.

In some instances, the case can go all the way to the Judicial Appeals stage. When this happens, the matter is heard in federal court. This means that just like any other court case you are given the opportunity to file motions and conduct discovery. Given that the stakes are high, you need a lawyer who has extensive experiences in SNAP violations defense. We have handled many cases for our clients, and our experience and skills can work in your favor to protect your store from disqualification.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.