ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · NEW YORK
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

New York SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

In the United States, the main anti-poverty program that allows for U.S. citizens to remain free of malnutrition and starvation is referred to as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. This program was first devised in the 1960s, under President Lyndon Johnson's anti-poverty program known as the War on Poverty. Since then, it has grown into the chief means of ensuring that no U.S. citizen, especially the country's most vulnerable children, goes hungry.

The rapid expansion of the SNAP program to its current state means that, today, nearly $100 billion each year is expended by the federal government in benefits at the retail level. This is a significant portion of the estimated $600 billion that American consumers spend on food at retail grocery establishments each year. Such a large-scale program has meant that nearly all convenience and grocery store businesses rely on SNAP revenues to form a large portion of their total profits. It also means that almost every store owner will need to be accepted as a SNAP vendor in order to maintain a viable business.

Throughout the history of the program, fraud has been a major concern. It has been estimated that at the start of the program, up to 10 cents for every dollar spent at the retail level by recipients of SNAP benefits were diverted by fraud and abuse. Today, that figure has been lowered to just one cent of every dollar spent. This dramatic reduction in fraud has been the result of vigorous enforcement efforts as well as the increasing ability of investigators and auditors to track the payments and transactions throughout the system, now that it is largely conducted through exclusively electronic means.

However, the same vigorous enforcement efforts that have so dramatically reduced the incidence of fraud have also caused many innocent store owners to be caught up in the dragnet of anti-fraud zeal. Each year, more than 15,000 store owners come under the scrutiny of the USDA, the agency tasked with enforcing all rules and regulations pertaining to the SNAP program. Over 5,000 of these owners will be subjected to some form of sanction, with hundreds being sent to prison for lengthy terms of incarceration and fined hundreds of thousands of dollars.

It is, therefore, imperative that any time a store owner is accused by the USDA of SNAP-related violations, that they put themselves in contact with a competent and experienced lawyer. All too often, store owners do not take letters from the USDA accusing them of violations seriously. About the best that such owners can hope for is a temporary exclusion from the SNAP program. This often entails months or years of ineligibility for any EBT transaction, a measure that will put most small convenience stores out of business.

But there are far more serious penalties to worry about. The most serious punishment for SNAP violations is 25 years in prison and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and restitution. The bad news is that each year, hundreds of store owners, some of them essentially innocent, are subjected to the harshest punishments allowed under the law for SNAP violations. The good news is that, with early intervention from an experienced lawyer, first-time SNAP violations can almost always be reduced to nothing more than a small fine.

Our legal team can make the difference

If you have received a letter from the USDA outlining allegations of SNAP related fraud or abuse, call us. The sooner you get a competent lawyer on your side, the more likely it is that we will be able to negotiate a favorable outcome on your behalf.

If you are a SNAP-eligible store owner who has never before been found guilty of a SNAP or EBT-related violation, it is almost certain that we will be able to resolve your case with little more than a small fine. Even if you are facing more serious allegations, such as trafficking in SNAP benefits, we can often assert your innocence and resolve the case without ruining your business or requiring that you spend time in jail or prison.

The best thing you can do is act quickly. If you are under suspicion of SNAP violations, call our experienced lawyers today.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.