ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · NASHVILLE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Nashville SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program has become the flagship anti-poverty measure within the United States. With origins tracing all the way back to the Roosevelt Administration, the current food stamp program was first constituted, in modern form, in the mid 1960s. Under Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty initiative, the SNAP program quickly became the chief means by which the United States ensured that none of its residents suffered the worst consequences of extreme poverty.

Today, the SNAP program keeps over 40 million Americans from suffering hunger or starvation and is able to ensure that the country's most vulnerable children are able to grow up big and strong, not stifled by the horrible effects of childhood malnutrition. The program, overall, has been a huge point of pride of the progressive movement, with countries around the globe turning to the SNAP program of the United States to see how best to implement policies that are proven to ameliorate poverty's worst effects.

However, for all of its many successes, the SNAP program was long beset by a high incidence of fraud and abuse. Throughout the first decade of the program's existence, it was estimated that as much as ten cents of every dollar spent on the program was diverted through fraud and abuse. This unacceptably high rate of graft led to a concerted government crackdown. In the 1970s, a special arm of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the agency tasked with running the SNAP program, was created. Known as the Food and Nutrition Service, the new agency came to employ more than 100 full-time investigators and analysts, whose sole job has been the elimination of fraud from the food stamp program.

These efforts have reduced the total incidence of fraud down to just one cent of every dollar spent in benefits at the retail level being consumed by abuse and fraud. While this has been a major success from an enforcement standpoint, one of the collateral effects of this heightened enforcement activity has been increasing numbers of innocent store owners caught in the wide dragnet of the FNS.

As a result, each year in the United States, some 15,000 store owners find themselves the target of USDA investigations into SNAP abuse. Among these, about 5,000 end up facing some kind of punishment. This can include everything from fines to up to 25 years in prison. Unfortunately, many of these store owners are completely innocent, and many have done nothing more than simply not paying sufficient attention to the regulations or the actions of their employees.

If you are accused, hire the best lawyer you can, as soon as you can

If you are a SNAP-eligible store owner, it is imperative that you hire competent and experienced legal counsel the moment you learn that you are the target of a USDA investigation. The USDA will notify you that they suspect you, your store or your employees have been engaged in untoward behavior regarding the SNAP program by a letter sent through the mail. If you receive a USDA letter detailing accusations of SNAP violations, you must hire a lawyer as soon as possible. Failure to do so will likely result in your exclusion from the SNAP program and serious losses in revenues. More serious violations could result in you being sent to jail or even prison.

A good lawyer can help

SNAP-related legal cases constitute a challenging and unique area of legal practice. But the good news is that, if quickly you hire an experienced lawyer who specializes in this area of law, almost all cases relating to SNAP violations can be negotiated down to paying a small fine. This is especially true where the accused store owner has no previous violations of SNAP regulations and where there is obviously no criminal intent.

However, failure to get a competent lawyer on your side may result in much more serious penalties being applied. You only have ten days from the time you receive your USDA letter outlining the alleged violations to make contact with the office and resolve the case. Failure to do so will almost always result in temporary exclusion from the SNAP program and an inability to perform EBT transactions.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.