ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · MEMPHIS
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Memphis SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

Since the mid-1960s, the SNAP program has been America's flagship vehicle for preventing widespread, severe malnourished due to poverty. First established in its modern form under the presidency of Lyndon Johnson, the SNAP program has come to represent one of the major progressive victories of the last 100 years in the United States. The program is widely regarded as being one of the most successful anti-poverty measures ever undertaken by a government and has served as a world-wide model of how to eradicate the worst consequences of poverty.

But in its early years, the program was beset by high levels of waste and fraud. This led to the creation of a special enforcement arm within the U.S Department of Agriculture, the government agency responsible for overseeing SNAP. Known as the Food and Nutrition Services, the special enforcement office has over 100 full-time investigators, whose sole job is to find cases of fraud taking place throughout the SNAP system.

Overall, the anti-fraud efforts have been a huge success. It has been estimated that in the first decade of the SNAP program's existence, up to ten percent of all money expended in benefits was being consumed by fraud and abuse. Today, that figure has been reduced to just one percent of all money spent by the program being diverted into fraudulent activity.

But these enforcement victories have also brought about some unwanted collateral damage. One of the more serious consequences to these vigorous enforcement efforts have been an increasing number of SNAP-eligible store owners being caught up in the dragnet of the FNS and its agents. Each year, an estimated 15,000 businesses are investigated for potential fraud related to the SNAP program. The vast majority of these companies are small, family owned convenience stores in urban areas. Up to 5,000 business owners each year are subjected to some form of penalty, including fines and exclusion from the SNAP program. In as many as 500 cases each year, the owners of the stores where alleged SNAP program violations occurred are sentenced to jail or prison terms.

If you become the target of a USDA investigation, you need to hire a lawyer

SNAP violation present a unique and challenging area of the law, which requires that lawyers practicing in this area have extensive expertise. Ideally, any lawyer handling a SNAP fraud case should be someone who specializes in that area of jurisprudence.

But if you are a store owner yourself, the single most important thing to know, should you receive a letter from the USDA detailing allegations of SNAP program abuses or fraud, is that you need to call an experienced and competent lawyer as soon as possible. Once you receive a letter from the USDA, you will have just ten days to respond to the allegations. Unlike in other areas of the law, the burden of proof is on you to show that you are innocent of the charges. Because the initial phases of a SNAP violation case involve mostly administrative actions, there is no burden on the state to prove that you are actually guilty of any of the alleged violations. In fact, there are many cases that we've seen where the target of the investigation clearly did nothing wrong, but for one reason or another, the agent in charge of the case decided to go ahead and fine or exclude the client from the program anyway.

However, even the most zealous USDA agent will usually not want to be forced to deal with a lawyer experienced in SNAP fraud cases. The truth is that almost all SNAP fraud investigations can be negotiated down to the store owner simply paying and small fine and going on their way. Even if you feel that you did nothing wrong, this can be a far better alternative than attempting to fight the USDA on your own, a move that often gets store owners temporarily excluded from the program. Our lawyers have decades of experience in handling these cases. And they can almost always avoid having a temporary exclusion from the SNAP program imposed on our clients' businesses, an event that can often prove fatal to vulnerable, small convenience stores.

If you have come under USDA scrutiny for alleged SNAP violations, give us a call today. A good lawyer can make all the difference.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.