ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · HOUSTON
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Houston SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is the flagship anti-poverty measure of the U.S. government. With its beginning tracing back as far as the late 1930s, the current manifestation of the program was first established in 1964, under Lyndon Johnson's famous War on Poverty initiative.

Today, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as SNAP, provides over 40 million Americans with the basic sustenance they need to stave off nutritional deficiencies. The program is widely regarded as a model of anti-poverty programs and has been emulated across the globe. It is a point of pride for the American progressive movement, as America has virtually eradicated the most severe forms of poverty from its citizenry and has all but eliminated malnutrition from its most disadvantaged children.

However, the prominence of this program and pride surrounding it mean that it is vigorously protected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the government agency tasks with enforcing the program and the regulations pertaining to it. The enforcement efforts have been successful in dramatically reducing the incidence of welfare fraud involving the SNAP program. It is estimated that for every dollar expended on the program, only one cent is consumed by fraud and abuse. This is a significant decline from the early days of the program, when it was estimated that as much as 10 percent of the funds apportioned to the program were being diverted through fraud and graft.

But the vigorous enforcement efforts are a sort of double edged sword for those store owners who participate in the SNAP program. The FDA has over 100 full-time investigators, auditors and other agents dedicated to investigating cases of alleged fraud and abuse. In a typical year, this means that more than 15,000 store owners are caught up in the SNAP enforcement dragnet. For many of these store owners, the experience is jarring and even life-altering. Many of these store owners are completely innocent of any personal wrongdoing and never had the slightest intent to defraud the taxpayer or the beneficiaries of SNAP benefits.

If you are accused, get the best legal help you can, as soon as possible

If you are the owner of a SNAP-eligible convenience or grocery store, and you have received a letter from the USDA detailing allegations of SNAP violations, the most important thing that you should do is to immediately put yourself in contact with a competent and experienced SNAP fraud lawyer.

All too often, we see clients that did not take the often vanilla-looking correspondence from the USDA seriously. Make no mistake, if you have received a USDA letter alleging SNAP violations, you are being accused of a serious crime and are facing serious penalties. The most benign penalty that store owners typically face is temporary exclusion from the SNAP program. For many, this would spell almost certain death for their business, as many store owners, particularly those in urban areas, rely on up to a quarter or more of their business from EBT transactions.

But this is only where the penalties start. If you or an employee of your business is being accused of the more serious crime of trafficking, that is, trading non-negotiable SNAP benefits for cash or other monetary consideration, you may be facing up to 25 years in prison and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and restitution. Unlike other areas of the law, the initial investigation is carried out by the USDA. This often leaves business owners with a false sense of security until it is too late and they find themselves in jail with million-dollar bonds awaiting trial for charges that carry long terms of incarceration.

For this reason, it is absolutely crucial that, should you find yourself under the scrutiny of the USDA for SNAP-related violations, you immediately put yourself in contact with an experienced and competent criminal lawyer.

Our lawyers have years of experience and hundreds of successfully handled cases under our belts. We can help you navigate the often confusing and mine-strewn legal terrain of the USDA investigation process, ensuring that you maximize your chances of a favorable outcome.

With the right legal counsel, your chances of making it through a SNAP abuse investigation are quite good. Give us a call today.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.