ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · CALIFORNIA
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

California SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

The SNAP program allows needy families to get food through an EBT card. Also commonly referred to as food stamps, SNAP can easily result in fraud if there is a violation of the program. When there is a violation, the USDA sends an official letter of notice to a retailer that accepts EBT. In general, in that situation, the USDA attaches pages to the SNAP violation notice that includes transactions that took place at the store that state the specific violations of the program.

If a retailer receives a SNAP violation letter, it’s important that they immediately contact an experienced attorney. There are only 10 days allowed for responding to the letter. If a response isn’t given within that time, the government will suspend the store’s right to accept EBT payments.

About the SNAP Program

The SNAP program is in place so that families who are in need are able to get food they might otherwise not be able to afford. Benefits are distributed through EBT cards. The benefits are only for general use and cannot be used to get cash back. EBT cards replaced food stamps in the 1990s and the program is nationwide and headed by the federal government.

There is a specific way in which the SNAP program is governed and there is a code of federal regulations. The FNS, a sub-agency of the USDA, is responsible for running the program and enforcing regulations.

What is a SNAP Violation?

There are a few ways that a retail store can be found guilty of SNAP legal violations. They occur when there is a specific violation of the rules, which include the following:

• If a store partakes in trafficking of SNAP benefits, it means the establishment fraudulently accepted benefits or allowed for the theft of SNAP benefits.

• The store accepted SNAP benefits for items that are not food, such as alcohol or tobacco.

• The store submitted false information on its applications to accept EBT benefits.

• If a store redeems more EBT transactions for food than regular food sales at the same time, it is a violation.

• Store employees took SNAP benefits from someone who was not allowed to use them.

How to Defend Against a SNAP Violation Letter

Hiring an attorney who is experienced in the area of managing SNAP violation letters is essential if you own a store that has been accused of committing one or more of these violations. When a violation letter is sent to a store, it should be considered the first steps by the USDA to remove its right to accept EBT benefits. A letter can come with or without warning at any time. It typically includes details of the violations as well as attached documents that show those violations.

A store owner has up to 10 days after receiving a violation letter to respond. When you seek the assistance of a lawyer, the attorney will handle all communications to the USDA, gather up all the necessary evidence and compose a response to the USDA.

It’s important to know that, even after the USDA has thoroughly reviewed a store’s response to a violation letter, the agency may still believe the store has committed a violation. If that happens, the USDA will send a second letter outlining its verdict as to whether or not to bar the store from accepting EBT benefits. The store has 10 days to respond to this decision as well. The attorney will file the necessary legal papers and notify the USDA that the store plans to appeal its decision.

If the USDA stands by its decision, the attorney will file a judicial review with the local federal court. This is like a regular court case that includes standard procedures, including discovery, motions and a trial.

Overall, the SNAP program can be tricky. EBT benefits have their limits and a good example is that people receiving those benefits cannot buy electronics. It’s wise for store owners to fully educate themselves to ensure that they know as much about the SNAP program as possible so that they can potential violations. However, if the store has already received a violation letter from the USDA, the best thing to do is to hire a SNAP violation lawyer at your earliest convenience.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.