ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196
3 MIN READ · REVIEWED BY TODD A. SPODEK
SNAP VIOLATION DEFENSE · ALBUQUERQUE
RETAIL STORES · EBT / SNAP

Albuquerque SNAP Violation Attorneys.

FNS retailer cases are federal - the same charge letters, deadlines, and appeal rights apply in every state. Here is how the process works, and where counsel changes the outcome.

Todd A. Spodek
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER · SPODEK LAW GROUP
212 300 5196 · 24/7
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
SUPER LAWYERS · 2020-25AVVO · “SUPERB”SECOND GENERATION · SINCE 1976
AS SEEN ON NETFLIX · CNN · FOX NEWS · NY POST
NETFLIX · 2022 · CREATED BY SHONDA RHIMES

Netflix told the story. The defense was ours.

When Shonda Rhimes built Inventing Anna, the defense at its center was Todd Spodek’s - argued for the so-called fake heiress in a Manhattan courtroom long before Arian Moayed of Succession played him on screen. What 320 million hours of viewers watched is the method every client of this firm gets - including the store owner with a charge letter on the counter.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.
TODD’S OPENING STATEMENT · THE SOROKIN TRIAL, 2019
#1
MOST WATCHED ON NETFLIX
196
COUNTRIES STREAMING
320M+
HOURS VIEWED
Open the Anna Delvey file →
THE OFFICIAL TRAILER · INVENTING ANNA
TODD PORTRAYED BY ARIAN MOAYED

The record behind the retainer.

PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME
FEDERAL Acquitted. $26M money laundering - complete acquittal at trial
FEDERAL Dismissed. RICO - client faced a 10-year mandatory minimum
2022 · NYT / AP Never charged. Juror 50, U.S. v. Maxwell - testified under immunity; verdict preserved
2024 · S.D.N.Y. Six months. $12M federal Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
2022 · ESPN No prison. Ex-NBA player, $4M healthcare fraud - no additional time
2023-25 · FEDERAL Lead defense. Three major crypto prosecutions, incl. the $16M Coinbase phishing case
THE FULL RECORD, EVERY ENTRY SOURCED →
RECOGNITIONS
Super Lawyers
2020 - 2025
Avvo rating
“SUPERB”
Rising Stars
2016 - 2019

The SNAP program is one of the oldest and most effective anti-poverty measures in the United States. The first forms of food assistance were brought into existence under Franklin Roosevelt's administration. But it wasn't until the mid-1960s, under Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty initiatives that the modern nutritional assistance program began to take shape.

Today, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is the U.S. government's flagship anti-poverty program. It supplies more than 40 million Americans with the basic sustenance they need to survive. Many of the beneficiaries are the most disadvantaged children in the country. And the program has been widely lauded for its success in the almost total elimination of the worst forms of poverty from the United States.

But as such a popular and effective program, SNAP is vigorously defended by the agency charged with its management, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Through its special enforcement arm, called the Food and Nutrition Service, each year, the FDA runs more than 15,000 investigations of stores that are flagged for possible irregularities relating to their transacting with EBT holders and other snap beneficiaries. This has resulted in more than 4,000 individual punitive actions being taken against store owners each year. In a typical year, up to 500 store owners are actually sent to prison for fraud relating to the nation's food stamp program.

With SNAP violations, a lack of intent may not be a sufficient defense

If you are a SNAP-eligible store owner and come under the scrutinous eye of the Food and Nutrition Service, the first thing that you should do is contact a lawyer who is experienced in the area of welfare fraud law. Because the investigation in to SNAP abuse are usually conducted by the FNS, which is a civilian agency, the area of welfare law can be a highly unique and complex area of legal practice.

If you come under suspicion by the USDA's Food and Nutritional Service of SNAP fraud or abuse, you will eventually receive a letter indicating what the nature of the alleged violations are. It is important to understand that this letter has the weight of law. You will have 10 days to contest the violations contained within the letter. If you do not follow the procedures exactly or allow the allotted time frame to lapse, you and your store will be effectively found guilty by default, and any relevant punitive actions will be taken against you. In almost all cases, this will result in a minimum of a temporary ban from participation in the SNAP program.

All too often, our lawyers see clients who have failed to react properly to the initial USDA letter accusing them of violations. These clients tend not to take the letter seriously, not realizing that it is a prelude to their exclusion from the SNAP program. Once the time to respond to any USDA allegations of SNAP abuse or fraud has elapsed, the only way to reverse the decision of the agency becomes judicial review, a costly and time-consuming process that can take years and has a spotty record of success.

This means that, should you fail to hire a competent lawyer immediately upon being accused of SNAP-related violations by the FDA, it is likely that your store will become excluded from the program. For most store owners, particularly those operating in urban environments, this is all but a death sentence for their business. Without the ability to accept any EBT transactions, many convenience and grocery store owners will be facing a loss of up to half of their business or more.

A good lawyer can make the difference

Our lawyers have the experience of hundreds of successfully handled SNAP abuse and fraud cases under their belts. While there is no guarantee of a favorable outcome in these cases, it is often possible to reduce the penalties to nothing more than a small fine. Most of our clients are able to continue operating as SNAP-eligible retailers, thus avoiding the most serious consequences to their businesses of an adverse determination by USDA inspectors.

If you find yourself the target of a USDA inquiry relating to SNAP violations, give us a call today. It may be the best business move you'll ever make.

Facing a SNAP charge letter or disqualification? Start with our full guide: USDA SNAP Violation Lawyers for Retail Stores, or call 212-300-5196 for an attorney, 24/7.

LEGAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE · STATUTES CHANGE - VERIFY CURRENT LAW · ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
IF A LETTER FROM FNS IS ON THE COUNTER
The response window is 10 days - and the strongest option expires with it.
WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

A second-generation firm. A senior partner's cell number.

Spodek Law Group has defended people and businesses against the federal government since 1976. SNAP retailer matters are handled the way the firm handles every federal case: the evidence gets read before anything is filed, deadlines get calendared on day one, and clients deal with counsel - not a call center.

50.
YEARS · TWO GENERATIONS
1,100+.
FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
24/7.
A PERSON ANSWERS · NOT A SERVICE
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNERSUPER LAWYERS 2020-25
★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Reading is good. Calling is better.

Tell us what arrived and when. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. If a deadline runs this week, call.

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02We confirm the delivery date and calendar every deadline on the file. 03If the firm can take the matter, the evidence work starts the same day.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIRED
CALL FOR URGENT DEADLINES
01
02
03
04
THE 10-DAY CLOCK RUNS FROM DELIVERY, NOT FROM WHEN THE LETTER IS OPENED OR CALL 212 300 5196
SUBMITTING THIS FORM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. THE FIRM MUST FIRST COMPLETE A CONFLICT CHECK AND AGREE TO THE REPRESENTATION.