ATTORNEY ON CALL · 24/7
212 300 5196

INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION · CENTRAL AMERICA

Extradition from Panama to the United States.

Treaty for the Mutual Extradition of Criminals controls the request. Panama's Constitution bars extradition of Panamanian nationals. The arrest clock and local review path decide what happens next.

Counsel working on the international federal record
FIG. - COUNSEL · THE PANAMA FILE
WRITTEN BYTodd A. Spodek
LEGAL REVIEWAttorney review pending
RESEARCH VERIFIED2026-07-14

THE SHORT ANSWER

Treaty route in force.

In force, old list treaty No authoritative standard timeline found. Old-treaty document issues and constitutional litigation can materially affect duration.

TREATY ON THE RECORD

Treaty for the Mutual Extradition of Criminals

Effective: 1905-05-08

Own nationals
Panama's Constitution bars extradition of Panamanian nationals. The treaty does not override that current constitutional protection; prosecution in Panama or other cooperation may be considered.
Dual criminality
The 1904 treaty is list-based. The conduct must fit an enumerated offense and satisfy the treaty's evidentiary/domestic-law requirements; modern dual-criminality analysis alone does not cure a missing listed offense, though multilateral conventions may provide separate authority.
Rule of specialty
Yes in substance: surrender is for the offense(s) granted, subject to treaty consent/waiver rules.
Provisional arrest
The old treaty permits urgent provisional detention on telegraphic/diplomatic information. The person must be released if a duly authenticated request is not produced within two months, without necessarily preventing a later request.
Appeal path
Habeas corpus and other constitutional/judicial remedies may challenge detention and surrender; the route depends on the issuing authority and stage.

WHAT COUNSEL CHECKS FIRST

The active paper. The country. The clock.

Warrant or noticeCustody and location in PanamaHearing or filing deadlineLocal-counsel requirement

THE RESPONSE ROOM

What has to be established first.

CUSTODY · PAPERS · CLOCK · COUNSEL

01

FIRST HOURS

Identify the legal basis for custody

Record the arresting authority, court, case number, custody location, interpreter need, and any hearing date. Ask for counsel before discussing the foreign accusation.

02

WHO DECIDES

The local record controls

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs receives the request and transmits it to the Ministry of Government/Public Prosecutor and competent courts as required. Judicial review addresses treaty and legal requirements; the executive makes the surrender determination.

03

THE CLOCK

Deadlines are event-specific

The old treaty permits urgent provisional detention on telegraphic/diplomatic information. The person must be released if a duly authenticated request is not produced within two months, without necessarily preventing a later request. No authoritative standard timeline found. Old-treaty document issues and constitutional litigation can materially affect duration.

04

DOCUMENT AUDIT

Build the file before the argument

Preserve the notice or warrant, charging papers, identity records, release terms, travel documents, medical records, and every dated communication. Do not alter or delete evidence.

FOR FAMILIES COORDINATING ACROSS BORDERS

Confirm the exact legal name, detention location, medication needs, next hearing, local lawyer, and one reliable contact channel. A consulate may assist with welfare and contact; it cannot cancel the local case.

Tell the intake team where the person is now →

02 · THE PROCESS

How the Panama process moves.

REQUEST · COURT · REVIEW · SURRENDER

Judicial and executive stages

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs receives the request and transmits it to the Ministry of Government/Public Prosecutor and competent courts as required. Judicial review addresses treaty and legal requirements; the executive makes the surrender determination.

Appeal and review

Habeas corpus and other constitutional/judicial remedies may challenge detention and surrender; the route depends on the issuing authority and stage.

Diagram separating judicial eligibility review from the executive surrender decision
FIG. - COURT CERTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE ACTION ARE DIFFERENT DECISIONS

03 · DEFENSES

The request still has to survive the record.

Put the papers in front of counsel →

ISSUE

Treaty coverage

The charged conduct, punishment threshold, documents, and identity must fit the controlling treaty and local implementing law.

ISSUE

Dual criminality

The 1904 treaty is list-based. The conduct must fit an enumerated offense and satisfy the treaty's evidentiary/domestic-law requirements; modern dual-criminality analysis alone does not cure a missing listed offense, though multilateral conventions may provide separate authority.

ISSUE

Political and protected offenses

Political offenses are excluded. Pure military and fiscal matters require close analysis under the old list and Panamanian law; there is no modern all-offenses fiscal clause.

ISSUE

Evidence and process

The request can be tested against the treaty standard, authentication requirements, limitation rules, and procedural guarantees that apply locally.

ISSUE

Human rights and punishment

Panama has abolished the death penalty. A capital request requires assurances. Constitutional due process, physical integrity, health and non-refoulement protections may affect surrender.

ISSUE

Specialty and assurances

Yes in substance: surrender is for the offense(s) granted, subject to treaty consent/waiver rules.

04 · PUBLIC EXAMPLES

Recent public extradition records.

GOVERNMENT RECORDS · NOT FIRM MATTERS

These examples come from public government records and are not presented as Spodek Law Group matters or results.

05 · THE CHARGES

What appears in the requests.

PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
sex trafficking and cyberstalking
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
alien smuggling
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
international narcotics trafficking
PUBLIC CASE PATTERN
money laundering

A Red Notice is not the extradition order.

A Red Notice asks police worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person, subject to each country's law. It is not an international arrest warrant, and it does not replace the treaty papers or the local extradition case.

The notice, the provisional-arrest request, and the surrender proceeding are separate records. Each can carry different defects, deadlines, and remedies.

Read the Red Notice file →

07 · THIRD-COUNTRY RISK

A new border changes the law. It does not erase the file.

Transit can expose a person to another country's arrest rules, immigration powers, or provisional request. This page gives no route or evasion advice. Review the actual warrant, notice, release conditions, and jurisdictions with counsel before travel.

08 · QUESTIONS

What families and targets ask first.

FULL ANSWERS · SOURCE REVIEWED

IMMEDIATE EXTRADITION QUESTIONS

It can. Border screening may expose a national warrant, INTERPOL data, immigration authority, or a provisional request under another country's law. This is not travel or evasion advice; the actual records and jurisdictions require review before travel.

AUTHORITIESwww.interpol.int

COUNTRY PROCEDURE

Yes. Treaty for the Mutual Extradition of Criminals is in force, old list treaty; the stated effective date is 1905-05-08. Always verify treaty status with the U.S. State Department/Office of International Affairs for a live case.

AUTHORITIEShistory.state.govwww.govinfo.gov

Todd A. Spodek at the conference table
FIG. - TODD A. SPODEK · MANAGING PARTNER

WHO REVIEWS THE FIRST CALL

Start with the paper, the posture, and the first deadline.

Todd A. Spodek leads the firm's federal defense work. The team identifies the active U.S. matter, the country and custody posture, and where appropriately licensed local counsel is required. No webpage can replace review of the actual request.

Todd Spodek - biography and record →

SECURE CONSULTATION REQUEST

Put the actual extradition record in front of counsel.

Tell us whether this is an inquiry, Red Notice, detention, hearing, or appeal. The intake team will identify conflicts and the right next step. Urgent custody and hearing matters should call.

212 300 5196 - urgent matters →
INTAKE · CONFLICT CHECK REQUIREDCALL FOR URGENT MATTERS
01
02
03
04
05
06
07

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. The firm must first complete a conflict check and agree to the representation.