24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Will Amendment 821 Be Applied Retroactively?

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

Will Amendment 821 Be Applied Retroactively?

In August 2023, the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) voted 4-3 in favor of the delayed retroactive application of Amendment 821, which relates to criminal history and sentencing guidelines. This significant move makes certain inmates eligible for reduced sentences, with the changes taking effect February 1, 2024. But the question remains – what exactly does Amendment 821 do, and what is the impact of applying it retroactively?

What Does Amendment 821 Do?

Amendment 821 introduces a new Section 4C1.1 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines that goes into effect November 1, 2023. It will apply to current cases and retroactively. Specifically, it provides a two-level decrease in sentencing for “zero-point offenders” when two conditions are met:

  • They receive the Zero-Point Offender Adjustment
  • The guideline range overstates the offense gravity because it’s not a crime of violence or other serious offense

The goal is to reduce overly harsh sentences for low-level, non-violent offenders. Supporters argue this makes sentences more fair and proportionate to the crimes committed.

The Impact of Retroactive Application

Applying Amendment 821 retroactively could benefit thousands of federal inmates. The USSC estimates around 2,850 offenders could get sentence reductions averaging nearly 5 years. Most are non-violent drug offenders. This could help correct unjust sentences from older, stricter guidelines.

However, retroactivity also has risks and unintended consequences. It could endanger public safety if dangerous offenders are released early. Some argue it could increase recidivism rates. There are also massive logistical issues – courts may be overwhelmed processing so many resentencing petitions and lack resources to handle the volume. It will take careful planning to implement retroactivity smoothly.

Arguments For Retroactive Application

Proponents of retroactivity make several key arguments:

  • It advances justice and fairness by correcting overly harsh old sentences.
  • Relieves overcrowding and reduces strain on prisons and courts.
  • Disproportionately helps low-level, non-violent drug offenders.
  • Helps correct racial disparities since minorities faced harsher sentences.
  • Brings sentences in line with more proportional, modern guidelines.

Making Amendment 821 retroactive could be a major step towards more just, equitable sentencing. Supporters say the benefits outweigh the risks.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Arguments Against Retroactive Application

Opponents counter with several concerns:

  • Could endanger public safety if dangerous offenders are released early.
  • May increase recidivism rates if prisoners are released without proper re-entry programs.
  • Overwhelms courts, prisons, and probation with resentencing petitions and releases.
  • Reverses lawfully-imposed sentences and disrespects original judge’s discretion.
  • Retroactivity should be reserved only for the most egregious, unconstitutional sentences.

Critics urge caution and incremental changes to avoid unintended consequences. A measured, careful approach is needed.

What Does Case Law Say?

Case law on retroactive application of sentencing amendments is complex. In Weaver v. Graham (1981), the Supreme Court ruled there is no ex post facto issue if retroactive changes only reduce sentences. However, in Dillon v. United States (1991), the Court said Congress must expressly authorize retroactivity.

Currently, federal courts are divided on Amendment 821 retroactivity. Some have allowed reduced sentencing, but others denied it, citing Dillon. The issue may reach the Supreme Court given the circuit split.

What is the Process for Retroactive Application?

The process for applying Amendment 821 retroactively involves several steps:

  1. USSC finalizes the amendment language and authorizes retroactivity.
  2. Eligible inmates petition courts for sentence reductions under 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
  3. Courts re-calculate and reduce sentences per the amended guidelines.
  4. Inmates are released early or transitioned to supervised release.

This process raises implementation challenges – courts may lack resources and probation may be overwhelmed preparing pre-release reports. A smooth roll-out requires advance planning.

What Should We Consider When Applying Amendments Retroactively?

The issues raised by Amendment 821 retroactivity highlight several key considerations for applying sentencing changes retroactively:

  • Conduct an impact analysis estimating the number of petitions and releases.
  • Assess public safety risks – don’t release dangerous offenders early.
  • Ensure probation and courts have adequate resources.
  • Develop re-entry and supervision plans to reduce recidivism.
  • Apply changes incrementally to manage impact on the justice system.
  • Respect original judges’ sentencing discretion.
  • Balance fairness for inmates with public safety concerns.

Retroactivity has benefits but also risks. Prudent planning and incremental changes can help maximize fairness while minimizing unintended consequences.

Conclusion

The retroactive application of Amendment 821 raises complex legal, ethical and practical issues. While it could help correct unfair sentences, it may also endanger public safety and overwhelm courts. The debate highlights the challenges of balancing fairness, proportionality and public safety in sentencing reform. As the USSC and courts grapple with these issues, they will likely proceed cautiously to avoid unforeseen consequences. But Amendment 821 retroactivity marks an important milestone in the ongoing evolution of federal sentencing.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now