24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

What factors do judges use in determining sentences?

What Factors Do Judges Consider When Determining Criminal Sentences?

The Harsh Reality

You’ve been charged with a crime, and now, your future hangs in the balance – as a judge weighs the evidence, to determine your sentence. But, what factors influence their decision? How do they arrive at a punishment that, supposedly, fits the crime?

The Sentencing Guidelines: A Flawed Framework

The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines provide a flawed, one-size-fits-all framework, that judges “must consider” – but aren’t bound by. These guidelines, a relic of the 80s “tough on crime” era, are based on an outdated, formulaic calculation of:

  1. The offense level (severity of the crime)
  2. Your criminal history

Plugging these two variables into a grid – produces a narrow sentencing range. For example, a first-time offender convicted of fraud might get 12-18 months. But, is this fair? Do these numbers tell the whole story?

Factors That Can Increase Your Sentence

While the guidelines aim for consistency – judges retain immense discretion, considering numerous aggravating factors that can drastically enhance punishment:

The Nature and Circumstances of the Offense

Did your crime involve physical violence, a weapon, or a minor victim? Inflict serious bodily injury? Demonstrate extreme cruelty? Occur in a special location like a school? All these circumstances, can exponentially increase your sentence.

Your Role in the Offense

Were you an organizer, leader, supervisor – or just a minor participant following orders? The more responsibility you had, the harsher your sentence. Abusing a position of trust, like a police officer or lawyer committing a crime – is also an aggravating factor.

Substantial Financial Losses

Crimes involving massive monetary losses, multiple victims, or deriving income from criminal activity – will be punished more severely. A $10 million fraud will draw far more time than a $10,000 theft.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Obstructing Justice

Lying to investigators, concealing evidence, fleeing from authorities – any act that obstructs the investigation or prosecution of your case, is a major aggravating factor.

Lack of Remorse

Judges want to see genuine remorse and acceptance of responsibility. Failing to show this, or continuing to make excuses – can significantly lengthen a sentence. But, what if you were just in the wrong place, at the wrong time? Framed by someone with a vendetta? Forced into a crime against your will? The guidelines don’t account for context – which judges must evaluate.

Mitigating Factors That Can Reduce Sentencing

Just as some factors can increase punishment – others allow judges to craft more lenient sentences, considering:

Your Role and Mental State

If you were a minor participant, only partially aware of the criminal conduct – or had diminished mental capacity affecting your judgment, this could mitigate culpability.

Victim’s Wrongful Conduct

In certain cases, if the victim initiated or provoked the crime – judges can consider this a mitigating circumstance, warranting a lighter sentence.

Efforts to Mitigate the Offense

Judges favor defendants who try making amends – by compensating victims, resigning from employment, self-reporting crimes, or providing timely assistance to authorities.

Acceptance of Responsibility

Pleading guilty and expressing genuine remorse, rather than blaming others or minimizing conduct – is a major mitigating factor that can reduce sentences.

Harsh Conditions of Confinement

If incarceration would subject you to unusually harsh conditions, like solitary confinement or lack of medical care – this could justify a non-custodial sentence. But, what if you were struggling with addiction, poverty, abuse, or mental illness – and turned to crime out of desperation? Judges must evaluate all circumstances.

The Human Element: Your Story Matters

While guidelines aim to eliminate bias – judges are human. Your unique story, life experiences, and personal characteristics – can significantly sway sentencing:

Age and Health

The guidelines recommend decreasing sentences for the elderly and seriously ill – as incarceration is far more difficult. Youth can also be a mitigating factor for first-time offenders.

Family Ties and Responsibilities

If you’re a single parent, primary caregiver, or have extensive family/community ties – this could justify alternatives to incarceration, so you can remain with dependents.

Military, Charitable, or Public Service

Judges may show leniency for defendants with distinguished military records, or those actively involved in positive community service.

Employment Record and Achievements

A stable work history, educational/vocational skills, and accomplishments suggesting you can be a productive citizen – can reduce sentences.

Socioeconomic Background

Coming from an environment of poverty, abuse, lack of resources or familial criminal history – may partially explain, though not excuse, criminal conduct. But, what if you had no prior record, an excellent work history, were the sole provider for your family – and made a single terrible mistake? The human context matters.

Bias and Disparity: The Elephant in the Room

Despite guidelines aiming for uniformity – studies show sentences still vary drastically based on the judge’s:

  • Gender
  • Race
  • Political affiliation
  • Socioeconomic background

With judges hailing from diverse backgrounds and holding different values – two defendants with nearly identical circumstances, can receive wildly divergent sentences before different judges. This disparity highlights how subjective and imperfect sentencing is – no matter how formulaic the guidelines attempt to be. Judges’ implicit biases shape their perception of:

  • The seriousness of crimes
  • What constitutes acceptance of responsibility
  • How much weight to assign aggravating/mitigating factors

So, what if your judge had a tough-on-crime upbringing? A personal history of being a victim? Presiding in a high-crime area? Their subjective experiences inevitably influence sentencing.

The Prosecutor’s Role and Plea Bargaining

In the vast majority of cases, sentences result from plea bargains – not trials. Prosecutors drive these negotiations, using their charging decisions and sentencing recommendations to dictate outcomes. Charge bargaining allows prosecutors to reduce charges carrying mandatory minimums. Fact bargaining means stipulating to fewer aggravating facts, lowering guidelines ranges. And in some cases, prosecutors can request statutory sentence reductions – by filing substantial assistance motions, if defendants cooperate against others. So while judges technically have discretion – prosecutors often dictate the parameters, by setting the base charges and facts that determine guidelines ranges.

Departures and Variances: Deviating from the Guidelines

In rare cases where guidelines ranges seem too high or low – judges can depart upwards or downwards, based on factors the guidelines fail to account for properly. Common grounds for departures include:

  • Extraordinary victim provocation
  • Coerced or incomplete duress
  • Diminished capacity short of insanity
  • Aberrant behavior by defendants with no criminal history

Judges can also vary from guidelines ranges entirely – if they conclude the guidelines yield an excessive or insufficient sentence, based on the statutory factors judges must consider, like:

  • Promoting respect for law
  • Providing just punishment
  • Affording adequate deterrence
  • Protecting public safety

But variances require extensive justification – and are easier to obtain for relatively less serious offenses, where guidelines are advisory only.

The Sentencing Hearing: Your Day in Court

At sentencing hearings, both sides present evidence and arguments regarding applicable guidelines ranges and appropriate sentences. Defendants can introduce mitigating evidence like:

  • Expert testimony about diminished capacity
  • Letters from family/community attesting to good character
  • Sentencing videos humanizing the defendant

Victims can also testify about the crime’s impact – which can increase sentences. The defendant gets the final word in an allocution statement – their chance to accept responsibility, express remorse, and advocate for leniency. Ultimately, the judge weighs all evidence and arguments – then renders a sentence, providing a justification that can be appealed if legally flawed or substantively unreasonable.

Sentencing Alternatives and Conditions of Release

For relatively less serious offenses, judges have discretion to impose alternatives like:

  • Probation
  • Home confinement
  • Community service
  • Substance abuse treatment

They can also impose conditions restricting conduct during supervised release – like mental health treatment, curfews, location monitoring, or occupational restrictions. But for more serious crimes, judges must impose imprisonment within calculated guidelines ranges – or adequately justify any departures or variances.

The Unpredictable Nature of Sentencing

At its core, sentencing is an inherently uncertain, unpredictictable process – where two defendants convicted of the same crime, can receive wildly divergent punishments. Because ultimately, it depends on:

  • The judge’s background, biases and personal philosophy
  • The prosecutor’s discretion in charging and bargaining
  • The specific facts and circumstances of each unique case
  • The quality of the arguments and evidence presented

So while guidelines aim to promote uniformity – sentencing will always involve an inescapable human element, where judges must wrestle with complex moral questions: What punishment fits each unique crime and defendant? How do we balance society’s need for deterrence and retribution – with giving a defendant a second chance? When should mercy prevail over strict adherence to the law? These are the imponderables judges grapple with daily – which no guidelines can perfectly calibrate. Sentencing will always be an imperfect, uncertain exercise in judgment.

Why Your Choice of Lawyer is Crucial

Given this vast judicial discretion and countless factors at play – your choice of criminal defense lawyer is crucial, to advocate persuasively for the most lenient sentence possible.An elite attorney can:

  • Highlight your mitigating personal circumstances
  • Minimize aggravating factors about the offense
  • Negotiate skillfully with prosecutors for reduced charges
  • Present compelling evidence and arguments at sentencing
  • Appeal excessive sentences as substantively unreasonable

Ultimately, an outstanding lawyer gives you the best chance of avoiding excessive punishment – by zealously humanizing you before the judge, as more than just a case number or set of charges. So if you’re facing charges, don’t gamble with your freedom. Hire a premier criminal defense firm with a track record of achieving lenient sentences for clients – through thorough preparation, outstanding advocacy, and treating each case with urgency.

The Spodek Law Group: Tenacious Advocates Fighting for You

At the Spodek Law Group, our elite criminal defense team leaves no stone unturned in pursuing the most favorable sentencing outcomes possible. Because we understand – your future, family, and freedom are at stake. Our attorneys have over 50 years of combined experience, including former prosecutors and members of prominent government agencies like the IRS and DEA. We’ve handled the full gamut of cases – from DUIs to homicides, and everything in between. But we’re not just skilled technicians – we’re passionate advocates who fight tirelessly for our clients. We get to know you as an individual, not just a case file. We humanize you before judges and juries – presenting the full context of your life story and circumstances. Our trial-tested strategies, meticulous preparation, and outstanding negotiation skills – allow us to frequently obtain sentences far below guidelines ranges. And if a judge’s ruling is flawed or excessive – we vigorously appeal to higher courts. When your liberty is on the line, you need attorneys with the experience, tenacity and legal acumen to leave no angle unexplored in pursuing the optimal outcome. At Spodek Law, we’re with you every step of the way – providing the aggressive defense you deserve.

So if you’re facing charges, don’t roll the dice with an inexperienced lawyer. Protect your future by contacting the Spodek Law Group immediately – for a confidential consultation on how we can fight to minimize your sentence. Because when everything is at stake, you need elite advocates batting relentlessly in your corner. Your life and freedom may depend on it.

Schedule Your Consultation Now