Criminal Defense Lawyers

What are the Aggravating Factors in South Carolina’s Sentencing Guidelines?

What Are Aggravating Factors?

In simple terms, aggravating factors are specific circumstances surrounding a crime that may persuade a judge to hand down a more severe sentence. 1 They essentially “aggravate” or worsen the seriousness of the offense in the eyes of the law. These factors give judges more leeway to issue stricter punishments beyond the standard sentencing range. The more aggravating circumstances are present, the harsher the potential sentence could be. Now, you might be thinking – “But wait, isn’t the whole point of having sentencing guidelines to ensure consistency?” You’re absolutely right. Sentencing guidelines aim to treat similar crimes and criminals in a uniform way to avoid unwarranted disparities. 2 However, the law also recognizes that no two cases are exactly alike. Aggravating factors allow judges to account for the unique details and increased culpability of certain crimes and criminals when determining an appropriate sentence. It’s all about striking that balance between uniformity and nuance in the justice system. The existence of aggravating factors is essentially the law’s way of saying “Yeah, the general guidelines apply…but this case is particularly bad and deserves some extra punishment.”

The Statutory Aggravating Factors in South Carolina

Enough preamble – let’s get to the nitty-gritty details you came here for. Under South Carolina law, there are 18 specific statutory aggravating factors that judges must consider during sentencing for certain crimes:

1. The murder was committed during a violent crime like sexual assault, kidnapping, burglary, robbery, etc. 3
2. The defendant has a prior murder conviction.
3. The crime knowingly put multiple people at great risk of death in a public place.
4. The crime was committed for the purpose of receiving money or something valuable.
5. The victim was a judge, prosecutor, or court officer killed due to their official duties.
6. The crime involved torture or dismemberment of the victim.
7. The crime was committed in an especially heinous, cruel, or depraved way.
8. The victim was a child under 11 or a person over 65.
9. The defendant was convicted of two or more murders in one act or transaction.
10. The murder of a victim was committed to get that person’s inheritance or stake in a company.
11. The victim was killed because they were a witness or potential witness.
12. The victim was a prisoner or staff member at a prison, jail, or correctional facility.
13. The victim was a fireman, emergency worker, or former judge/prosecutor killed due to their job.
14. The crime was committed by someone in a leadership role in a drug trafficking organization.
15. The victim was killed because of their race, religion, national origin, or physical disability.
16. The defendant was convicted of a prior violent crime.
17. The victim was killed to disrupt the exercise of any governmental function or enforcement of laws.
18. The victim was killed because they were involved in the same drug trafficking as the defendant.

Whew, that’s a long and grim list, huh? The key takeaway is that these aggravating factors cover a wide range of circumstances that make a crime particularly reprehensible in the eyes of South Carolina law. 4 Things like killing a child, torturing a victim, committing a murder for hire, or being a repeat violent offender can all open the door for much harsher sentences if convicted. Now, it’s important to note that the mere existence of one or more of these factors doesn’t automatically mean you’ll get the maximum possible sentence. The judge still has some discretion in weighing the factors and determining an appropriate punishment. However, having multiple aggravating circumstances present in your case is…well, let’s just say it’s not going to do you any favors come sentencing time. The more boxes you check on that lovely list above, the worse it’ll likely go for you.

How Aggravating Factors Actually Impact Sentencing

Okay, so we know what the statutory aggravating factors are in South Carolina. But how do they actually influence the specific sentence a judge can hand down if they’re found to be present in a case? Well, it’s all about giving judges more flexibility to depart from the standard sentencing range and get a bit Draconian with their punishments if needed.You see, for most crimes in South Carolina, there’s a presumptive sentencing range that judges are supposed to follow absent any extenuating circumstances. It’s kind of like sentencing guardrails to promote consistency. 5 But if a judge finds that one or more of those statutory aggravating factors we discussed earlier do apply to the case, they can go ahead and bypass those standard ranges in favor of a harsher “aggravated” sentence. How harsh? Well, that’s where we get into some legal jargon. Bear with me here…For less serious felonies classified as “Class F” through “Class D” offenses, an aggravated sentence would be up to the statutory maximum for that crime. So if the standard presumptive range was, say, 2-5 years, but aggravating factors were present, the judge could in theory max it out at 10, 15, 20 years or whatever the absolute cap is for that charge. 6 For the most serious “Class C” felonies and “Class B1” trafficking crimes, things get even more severe. If aggravating factors apply, the judge can go all the way up to that offense’s statutory maximum, or they can issue an “aggravated” sentence from the next highest offense class level. 6 That’s legal jargon for “We’re gonna punish you like you committed a way worse crime than you actually did.”Finally, for the absolute most heinous and reprehensible first-degree murders in South Carolina, if the judge finds one of those 18 statutory “aggravating” factors, they can go nuclear and impose…the death penalty. 3 Yeah, I know – that’s some heavy stuff. Capital punishment is definitely the most extreme example of how aggravating factors can ratchet up a sentence to the absolute maximum.The main point is, while sentencing guidelines exist to try to standardize punishments, aggravating factors give judges a kind of “override” option to get way harsher if the particular circumstances of the crime demand it in their judgment.

The Role of Mitigating Factors

You know what they say – for every yin, there’s a yang. Just as aggravating factors can increase a sentence’s severity, mitigating factors have the opposite effect and can actually reduce the punishment someone receives. Mitigating factors are essentially the counterbalance or counterarguments to aggravating circumstances. They’re specific details that might make the crime seem less depraved or the defendant less blameworthy in the grand scheme of things. Some common examples of statutory mitigating factors in South Carolina include:

• The defendant having no prior criminal record or a very minor one
• The defendant was under duress or coercion when committing the crime
• The defendant’s youth or advanced age at the time of the offense
• The defendant’s mental illness or diminished capacity
• The defendant showing genuine remorse
• The defendant’s relatively minor role in the crime
• The defendant turning themselves in and accepting responsibility

You get the idea – mitigating factors are essentially reasons why the defendant might deserve a little leniency or a less harsh punishment than the bare facts of the case might suggest. During sentencing, it becomes a bit of a balancing act for the judge. They have to weigh the aggravating factors that could justify a stricter sentence against any mitigating factors that could call for more mercy and a lighter punishment. If the mitigating circumstances outweigh the aggravating factors in the judge’s eyes, they can issue a “mitigated” sentence below the standard range. If the aggravating factors look way worse, the sentence can be ratcheted up to an “aggravated” level as we discussed before. It’s this constant push-and-pull between the good and bad facts of the case that judges have to juggle and try to synthesize into a sentence they deem appropriate and just.

The Crucial Role of a Skilled Defense Attorney

Okay, now that we’ve covered what aggravating factors are and how they can impact sentencing, here’s something crucial: You absolutely need an experienced, skilled defense attorney in your corner to zealously argue against the application of any potential aggravating factors in your case. Why? Because the difference between having an aggravating factor found or not can literally mean years or even decades of additional prison time versus a much lighter sentence. The stakes are massively high. A good defense lawyer will already be very familiar with the statutory list of aggravating factors and know how to craft persuasive arguments for why they shouldn’t apply to the facts of your case. They’ll look for every possible mitigating circumstance to emphasize as well. They may argue that certain evidence should be excluded or highlight contradictory testimony to create reasonable doubt about an aggravating factor’s existence. They could bring in expert witnesses to discuss your mental condition or role in the crime.

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Loveth Okpedo

2024-03-12

Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience

Bee L

2024-02-28

Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.

divesh patel

2024-02-24

I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Load more

Google rating score: 4.9 of 5, based on 736 reviews

The bottom line is that a talented defense attorney knows that sentencing is truly where some of the biggest battles are fought and won in criminal cases. They’ll pull out all the stops to prevent the application of aggravating factors and advocate forcefully for the lightest possible sentence. On the flip side, if you go it alone or have an overworked public defender who doesn’t specialize in sentencing advocacy, you’re essentially bringing a knife to a gunfight. The prosecution will have a much easier time convincing the judge that aggravating factors exist and justifying a harsh sentence. So if you want to avoid decades of potential extra prison time, make sure you have a skilled, experienced, and aggressive defense attorney in your corner who knows how to counter any allegations of aggravating circumstances in your case.