Understanding the South Carolina Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Contents
Understanding the South Carolina Federal Sentencing Guidelines
If you or a loved one is facing federal criminal charges in South Carolina, one of the most important things to understand is how sentencing works if convicted. The South Carolina federal courts follow the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a complex set of rules and calculations that largely determine the sentence a defendant will receive.While judges do have some discretion, the guidelines provide a fairly narrow sentencing range based on the offense level and the defendant‘s criminal history. It’s crucial to have an experienced federal criminal defense attorney who thoroughly understands the guidelines and how to argue for the lowest sentence possible.
How the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work
The federal sentencing guidelines consider two main factors in determining a sentence:
- The offense level, which reflects the severity of the crime
- The defendant’s criminal history category
There are 43 offense levels, with level 1 being the least serious and level 43 the most serious. The guidelines manual has a detailed set of rules for calculating the offense level based on the specific facts of the case.There are 6 criminal history categories, from I (little or no criminal record) to VI (extensive criminal record). Points are assigned for prior convictions based on the severity and recency of the offenses.The offense level and criminal history category are plotted on a sentencing table, with the offense level on the vertical axis and the criminal history category on the horizontal axis. The intersection shows the guideline sentencing range, in months of imprisonment.For example, an offense level of 22 and criminal history category of III yields a range of 51-63 months. The judge must sentence within that range unless they find a legal reason to “depart” upward or downward.
Factors that Increase the Offense Level
Many factors can increase the offense level and lead to a longer sentence, such as:
- The amount of drugs in a drug trafficking case
- The amount of loss in a fraud case
- Use of a dangerous weapon
- Injury to a victim
- An aggravating role, like being a leader or organizer
- Obstructing justice, like lying to investigators
The guidelines have detailed rules and formulas for each factor. In a fraud case, for instance, the amount of loss is plugged into a table to determine the level increase. Over $6,500 adds 2 levels, over $15,000 adds 4 levels, and so on up to 30 levels for a loss over $550 million.
Reductions in the Offense Level
Some factors can reduce the offense level, such as:
- Minor role in the offense
- Acceptance of responsibility, usually shown by pleading guilty
Accepting responsibility is the most common reduction, taking off 2 or 3 offense levels for pleading guilty and saving the government the burden of a trial. But this reduction can be lost for misconduct like lying to investigators or not admitting relevant conduct.
Departures and Variances
In some cases, the judge may depart above or below the guideline range if they find that the case falls outside the “heartland” of typical cases. Upward departures may be based on factors like extreme conduct or dismissed charges. Downward departures may be based on things like diminished capacity or coercion.The judge can also vary above or below the range based on the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), if they find that the guideline sentence is too high or low to achieve the purposes of sentencing. These factors include things like the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history and characteristics of the defendant, and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities.Arguing for a below-guideline variance requires marshaling mitigating evidence and presenting a compelling case for leniency. An experienced attorney will know what kind of evidence can persuade a judge to vary downward.