24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196




When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

The FTC’s Investigative and Enforcement Process

The FTC’s Investigative and Enforcement Process: A Helpful Overview

The Federal Trade Commission, commonly referred to as the FTC, serves an important role in protecting consumers and promoting competition. As part of its mission, the FTC regularly conducts investigations into potential violations of consumer protection and antitrust laws. If any violations are uncovered, the FTC may pursue enforcement actions through administrative proceedings or by filing cases in federal court.

The FTC’s authority to carry out investigations and bring enforcement actions stems from several key laws, most notably the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Clayton Act, and the Sherman Act [1]. This article aims to provide a helpful overview of how the FTC investigates allegations of wrongdoing and the process for taking enforcement action when violations are found.

How Investigations Get Started

There are several ways an FTC investigation can begin:

  • Consumer complaints submitted directly to the FTC
  • Referrals from other government agencies
  • Proactive monitoring of concerning industry practices by FTC staff
  • Tips or concerning media reports brought to the FTC’s attention

For instance, a surge of complaints from consumers about a company’s potentially deceptive business practices could trigger an FTC investigation [1]. The FTC also initiates industry-wide investigations of particular practices that may be unfair or harmful to consumers and the competitive marketplace.

How the FTC Gathers Evidence in Investigations

During an investigation, FTC staff utilize various tools to gather evidence relating to possible legal violations [1]:

  • Civil investigative demands (CIDs) – These are requests for information similar to subpoenas. CIDs can require a company or individual to provide documents, written reports, answers to questions, or oral testimony.
  • Compulsory process – This includes orders that compel a company or person to furnish information or allow inspection of records [2].
  • Subpoenas – The FTC has authority to issue subpoenas to obtain documents, testimony, or other relevant information.

If a company fails to comply with an FTC request for information, the FTC can go to court to seek an order enforcing compliance. Those who knowingly violate such court orders may face being held in contempt of court [2].

Maintaining Confidentiality During Investigations

Information provided to the FTC over the course of an investigation is required to be kept confidential. This prohibits companies under investigation from disclosing that an investigation is underway or revealing any related information furnished to the FTC.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

However, the FTC is permitted to share confidential investigative materials with other law enforcement agencies as needed to facilitate cooperation on related investigations and avoid duplication of efforts [1].

How Investigations Get Closed

There are several potential outcomes when an FTC investigation wraps up:

  • The FTC may decide to initiate an enforcement action if evidence of legal violations is found.
  • The FTC could close an investigation by accepting voluntary commitments from a company to alter problematic practices.
  • An investigation may be closed without further action if no violations are identified.

Even when an investigation is closed without enforcement action, the FTC reserves the right to reopen matters if new evidence comes to light or circumstances change [3].

Enforcement Options When Violations Are Found

If an FTC investigation uncovers evidence that a company has broken the law, the agency may pursue enforcement actions such as:

  • Administrative proceedings – The FTC prosecutes cases before an administrative law judge. If violations are proven, the judge can order remedies like monetary relief for harmed consumers or changes to problematic business practices.
  • Federal court litigation – For certain types of violations, the FTC can file lawsuit cases directly in federal court seeking injunctions, monetary redress for consumers, disgorgement of ill-gotten profits, and imposition of civil penalties.

Before initiating any enforcement action, the FTC must have “reason to believe” the law has been violated [4]. The specific processes differ depending on whether administrative proceedings or federal court litigation is utilized.

Administrative Enforcement Process Walkthrough

Here are the typical steps in an FTC administrative enforcement action:

  1. The FTC issues an administrative complaint laying out the charges against the company.
  2. The case is tried in a trial-like hearing before an FTC administrative law judge as per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure[1]. This involves procedures like motions, discovery, and presentation of evidence as in a typical civil court case.
  3. The administrative law judge oversees the proceedings and makes evidentiary and procedural rulings as needed[2].
  4. After both sides present their cases, the judge issues an initial decision determining whether any law violations occurred[3]. This decision may include findings of fact and conclusions of law[4].
  5. If either party disagrees with the initial decision, they can file an appeal to have the case reviewed by the full Federal Trade Commission[5].
  6. If no appeal is filed, or if the Commission upholds the initial decision, the FTC will issue a final order detailing any remedies or sanctions based on the findings of violations[6].

Potential remedies ordered at the conclusion of the administrative process can include refunds or other redress for consumers, injunctions forcing the company to cease illegal practices or make changes to comply with the law, and requirements to submit compliance reports. It is also possible for companies to reach a settlement resolving the charges before an initial decision is rendered[3].

Overview of the Federal Court Litigation Process

When the FTC pursues violations through federal court litigation, the key steps typically include:

  1. The FTC files a complaint in federal district court alleging violations of law by the company.
  2. The company has 21 days to file an answer responding to the complaint’s allegations.
  3. The discovery process begins, where both sides can request documents and take depositions to gather evidence.
  4. The court may hold pre-trial hearings to resolve any motions filed by the parties.
  5. If no settlement is reached, a bench trial is held before a federal judge (no jury).
  6. The judge issues findings of fact and conclusions of law determining if any violations occurred.
  7. If violations are found, the court can impose injunctions, monetary relief for consumers, and civil penalties.
  8. After a final judgment, either party can appeal the decision to a federal appeals court.

In federal court cases, the FTC must prove violations by a preponderance of the evidence. Companies cannot directly appeal an FTC administrative complaint in court – they must go through the full administrative process first[5].

Schedule Your Consultation Now