24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Seeking Contempt Sanctions for Unauthorized Leaks of Grand Jury Information

Seeking Contempt Sanctions for Unauthorized Leaks of Grand Jury Information

Unauthorized leaks of confidential grand jury information have long posed a challenge for courts and prosecutors. Recent high-profile cases have renewed focus on this issue and raised questions about the appropriate remedies when leaks occur.

Grand jury proceedings are supposed to remain secret, with limited exceptions, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). This rule serves important interests like protecting witness privacy, encouraging participation, and preventing targets from fleeing or interfering with an investigation before charges are filed.

But leaks still happen on occasion. Government officials, grand jurors, witnesses, or others privy to the proceedings may disclose details to the media or public, whether deliberately or inadvertently. When this occurs, it can jeopardize the integrity of an ongoing investigation and unfairly damage reputations.

So what can courts do when leaks happen? Let’s look at the potential sanctions and remedies under current law.

Dismissal of the Indictment

One option is for the court to dismiss any indictment returned by the grand jury, thus ending the criminal case. But this is an extremely rare and disfavored outcome. Courts view it as a drastic measure of last resort.

The Supreme Court has said dismissal is only appropriate when leaks caused “systemic and pervasive” harm or substantially influenced the grand jury’s decision. See Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States. Anything short of that high bar, and courts will opt for less severe responses.

Holding Reporters in Contempt

When media outlets publish leaked grand jury secrets, prosecutors sometimes try to force reporters to disclose their sources through subpoenas. But courts have largely rejected this approach under the First Amendment’s press protections.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

The Supreme Court ruled in Branzburg v. Hayes that reporters must comply with grand jury subpoenas. However, many lower courts have declined to hold reporters in contempt for refusing to identify sources, creating an uncertain legal landscape.

Internal Investigations

Prosecutors’ offices have procedures to investigate suspected leaks internally through their Office of Professional Responsibility. But these reviews rarely yield public findings and may not satisfy courts or grand jury targets.

Judges sometimes order independent investigations by an outside third party. While this option avoids appearances of bias, it too rarely determines the source or prevents future leaks.

Injunctions

Courts can issue injunctions ordering prosecutors, agents, and grand jurors not to disclose proceedings. But these are preventative measures, not sanctions for leaks that already occurred. Their effectiveness depends on compliance from many parties.

Civil Contempt

Judges can hold leakers in civil contempt, imposing fines or jail time until they comply with orders not to release additional information. This forces action through coercive sanctions.

But it works better for preventing future leaks than punishing past ones. Also, the leaker’s identity must be known for coercive sanctions to directly target the violation.

Criminal Contempt

Criminal contempt charges can punish past leaks even if the source remains anonymous. This may include fines or imprisonment. Criminal contempt requires prosecutors to prove the disclosure was willful, but does not coerce compliance.

Appeals courts have upheld criminal contempt findings based on circumstantial evidence about the leak’s origin. See Barry v. United States. However, contempt defendants can demand a jury trial under certain circumstances. See Bloom v. Illinois.

Ethics Complaints Against Attorneys

Courts can refer prosecutor’s office attorneys to bar associations for disciplinary review if they improperly disclose grand jury information. But this depends on identifying the specific lawyer(s) involved, which is often impossible.

Such ethics proceedings also focus on professional conduct standards rather than remedying damage from leaks. They may lead to censure or suspension but not jail time.

Removing Prosecutors from the Case

Courts can disqualify prosecutor’s offices from a case entirely if they determine that improper leaks irreversibly tainted the proceedings. But this extreme step essentially forces the government to start over from scratch.

Judges view removal as a last resort only appropriate if leaks clearly undermined the case. Otherwise, they will opt for less disruptive responses.

Assessing the Options

Dismissing indictments, holding reporters in contempt, and removing prosecutors are rare outcomes courts try to avoid. Internal investigations, injunctions, and ethics reviews offer limited remedies. That leaves civil and criminal contempt as the most viable options.

Many judges view civil contempt as the preferable path. It aims to coerce compliance rather than punish. However, it works better for preventing future leaks than addressing past ones. Criminal contempt charges can punish previous leaks even without identifying the source. But courts proceed cautiously, given the serious due process concerns of potential jail time.

There are no perfect solutions. Courts must weigh competing interests like transparency, privacy, and public trust when leaks occur. The best approach depends on the severity of the breach and its impact on the proceedings. But judges favor the least intrusive sanctions that still have a reasonable chance to effectively respond to unauthorized disclosures.

The bottom line is that grand jury leaks pose complex challenges. While courts have a range of options to address them, no single remedy fits every situation. The law on this issue remains unsettled and continues evolving in response to high-stakes cases.

Schedule Your Consultation Now