Criminal Defense Lawyers

Securities Fraud: Understanding Criminal vs Civil Liability Risks

Securities Fraud: Criminal vs Civil Liability

Securities fraud involves the deception of investors or manipulation of financial markets. It comes in many forms – from high-yield investment frauds to Ponzi schemes – but can lead to both criminal and civil liability. Understanding the differences is key for companies and individuals aiming to avoid liability risks.

Criminal Liability

The most serious form of liability for securities fraud is criminal prosecution. This is typically pursued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) when the fraud is egregious and done with intent.

Criminal liability often arises when individuals or companies intentionally mislead investors on key details about securities offerings. This could involve fabricating financial statements, lying about company performance metrics, or obscuring risks from investors. Executives and corporate officers may also be criminally liable if they enable fraudulent activities to occur under their watch.

Criminal convictions can lead to steep fines and years in federal prison. Martha Stewart, for example, served a 5-month prison sentence after being criminally convicted for obstruction of justice related to insider trading.

The bar for criminal liability is high. Prosecutors must prove intent and willful violation of securities laws beyond a reasonable doubt. But criminal liability is still a major risk, given the steep penalties involved. Companies aim to avoid it through robust compliance programs, while individuals must be vigilant about fraud occurring under their authority.

Civil Liability

The SEC often pursues civil charges for activities that may not rise to the level of criminal prosecution. These civil lawsuits can still lead to major fines, penalties, and other consequences like officer/director bars.

Unlike criminal cases, civil charges only require a “preponderance of evidence” rather than “beyond reasonable doubt.” This lower bar makes civil liability more common. The SEC brought over 700 civil enforcement actions in 2021 alone.

Large public companies face the highest risks here. Civil penalties can quickly scale into the millions or billions – as seen in recent high-profile cases against Wells Fargo ($3 billion) and Goldman Sachs ($2.9 billion).But civil liability extends to individuals too. Corporate executives have faced officer/director bars, trading suspensions, clawbacks, and other sanctions in civil cases. In 2021, the SEC barred three former executives from pharmaceutical company MiMedx for their roles in an accounting fraud.

While not as severe as jail time, civil sanctions can still carry lasting damage. Companies aim to mitigate risks through internal controls, monitoring, and cooperation with authorities. But securities violations can happen despite best efforts – underscoring the need for vigilance.

Key Differences

The table below summarizes some major differences between criminal vs civil liability:

In essence, criminal liability imposes harsher sanctions under a higher burden of proof. Prosecutors take on more challenging cases to secure convictions, while the SEC’s lower burden of proof makes civil actions more common.

But both forms of liability carry potentially severe consequences for companies and individuals. Robust compliance, oversight, auditing and other checks are essential to limit liability risks.

Avoiding Liability Risks

Securities fraud liability can seemingly arise out of nowhere, damaging company finances and employee reputations overnight. But proactive steps can help substantially mitigate risks:

Strong Internal Controls

Internal controls are processes companies implement to prevent, detect and respond to compliance issues. This includes proper oversight procedures, auditing protocols, documentation standards, and channel for employee tips/concerns.

Strong controls make it much harder for individuals to perpetrate fraud without getting caught. And evidence of robust controls can reduce liability risks even when incidents do occur.

Ongoing Training

Comprehensive and regular employee training is vital for limiting securities fraud risks. Training helps ensure employees at all levels understand compliance obligations relevant to their roles. It also sets a strong tone from leadership that integrity matters.

As regulations change, companies must update training programs accordingly. Large financial services firms now invest heavily in “conduct risk” training to avoid episodes like Wells Fargo’s fake account scandal.

Quick Investigation & Remediation

When credible allegations of fraud do arise, addressing them quickly and thoroughly is critical. Companies should have protocols for investigating concerns, remediating any harms, and cooperating transparently with authorities as needed.

The SEC and DOJ often cite “self-reporting, cooperation and remediation” as mitigating factors when imposing sanctions. Handling incidents properly doesn’t eliminate liability, but can substantially reduce consequences.

Common Schemes & Defenses

While securities fraud liability risks can never be fully eliminated, understanding common schemes can help guide mitigation strategies:

Financial Statement Fraud

This involves fabricating or altering financial statements to mislead investors on company performance. Typical methods include premature/fictitious revenue recognition, understating liabilities, and inflating asset valuations.

Strong internal controls and auditing standards are key defenses here. Independent audit committees also help. Training accountants to spot red flags and having robust whistleblower policies enable earlier detection.

Insider Trading

This occurs when individuals trade securities based on material, non-public information – in breach of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders and the company. Compliance training, trading pre-clearance requirements, blackout period policies, and trade monitoring analytics help mitigate risks.

Accounting Fraud

Besides financial statement manipulation, this includes schemes like concealing bribes or kickbacks, misappropriating assets, and intentionally misapplying accounting standards.

As with other financial crimes, internal controls, auditing protocols, documentation standards, and whistleblower protections are key. Training accountants on proper standards is vital.

Microcap Fraud

This involves artificially inflating share prices of small, thinly-traded “microcap” companies through misleading promotions, paid stock touts, or pump-and-dump schemes.

Robust due diligence on securities issuances can help avoid enabling such frauds. Strong insider trading controls also help deter related manipulation schemes.

For companies, the liability risks go beyond just direct legal consequences. The reputational damages and loss of investor trust associated with securities fraud incidents can have lasting business impacts regardless of legal outcomes.

Understanding the criminal vs civil liability landscape is the first step toward mitigating these risks through strong controls, procedures and integrity culture. But securities violations can still happen despite best efforts. Maintaining perspective and having response protocols in place can help limit the fallout when issues do arise.