Securities Fraud: How the SEC Investigates Accounting Fraud Allegations
Contents
Securities Fraud: How the SEC Investigates Accounting Fraud Allegations
Securities fraud is a big deal. The SEC—the Securities and Exchange Commission—is the main regulator that investigates cases of securities fraud, especially those involving publicly traded companies. So how exactly does the SEC go about investigating allegations of accounting fraud? Let’s break it down step-by-step.
What Triggers an SEC Investigation?
The SEC can launch investigations based on a few different triggers. These include[1]:
- Tips and Complaints: The SEC frequently receives tips and complaints from company insiders like employees, former employees, customers or industry experts. These tips may alert them to potential wrongdoing.
- Referrals: Other government agencies like the FBI or DOJ may refer cases involving potential securities violations to the SEC.
- Surveillance and Monitoring: The SEC monitors trading markets and SEC filings for red flags or unusual activity that may indicate fraud. Things like spikes in trading volume, rapid stock price changes or inconsistencies in financial statements can raise alarms.
- Required Internal Reporting: Public companies are required under Sarbanes-Oxley to have procedures in place for employees to anonymously report potential legal or ethical violations internally. The SEC can review these reports during investigations.
So in short—the SEC relies on both proactive monitoring efforts as well as external tips and referrals to identify potential securities fraud cases for investigation.
Gathering Evidence in Accounting Fraud Investigations
Once the Enforcement Division has decided to open an investigation into potential accounting fraud, they start gathering evidence. This evidence gathering can include[2]:
- Document requests: The SEC has authority to subpoena documents like emails, financial statements, internal audit reports, board meeting minutes, etc. This paper trail is critical for understanding the timeline of events and identifying problems or inconsistencies.
- Witness interviews and testimony: The SEC attorneys will interview or depose key witnesses like executives, accountants, bankers and traders associated with the company. This helps them piece together the story and identify potential lies or misinformation.
- Industry expert consultation: The SEC may consult independent industry and accounting experts to analyze the company’s financial statements, disclosures and business models to spot irregularities requiring more scrutiny.
- Site visits: SEC attorneys can show up unannounced at company headquarters or other sites to request documents on the spot and observe operations firsthand. This prevents document destruction between formal requests.
The SEC has broad authority to compel cooperation and procure evidence—those who resist or obstruct investigations may face additional charges for impeding an SEC investigation.
Assessing Findings & Potential Charges
Once the fact-finding phase of the investigation is complete, the SEC attorneys analyze the evidence gathered to determine whether securities violations have occurred. Specifically for accounting fraud, they assess[3]:
- Material misstatements: Were material inaccuracies or omissions identified in financial statements filed with the SEC or provided to investors? Even unintentional accounting errors may be considered securities fraud if significant enough.
- Intent: Did executives or other employees show intent or recklessness in misrepresenting financial information? Proof of intentional deception can warrant criminal charges.
- Benefit: Did corporate insiders manipulate earnings or financial position to benefit themselves, for example to boost the stock price, achieve bonuses tied to financial targets or hide poor performance?
Based on the nature and severity of violations identified, the SEC may bring civil charges or refer the case to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. Common charges in accounting fraud cases include[4]:
- False or misleading SEC filings
- Improper revenue/expense recognition
- Concealing liabilities or risks from investors
- Insider trading
- Obstruction of justice
The penalties sought will depend on the extent of wrongdoing, shareholder losses inflicted and level of negligence or intent found by investigators.
Settling Charges vs Litigation
Many SEC investigations end in a settlement where the company or executives agree to certain penalties without admitting guilt. This saves time and expense of a court trial. Settlements often include fines, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and injunctive relief like reforms and monitoring to prevent repeat offenses[5].
If a settlement can’t be reached, the SEC will file formal litigation and the case goes to trial. The litigation process involves further evidence discovery, witness examinations and legal arguments before a federal judge issues a ruling. In addition to financial penalties, litigation can result in more serious consequences like officer/director bars, loss of licenses and even jail time in criminal cases.
The SEC takes accounting fraud very seriously, as misleading financials undermine investor trust and decision making, harming market integrity. By understanding how the SEC investigates allegations of financial statement manipulation and other violations, companies can better prepare to cooperate, respond appropriately and avoid penalties. Detecting problems early and self-reporting also allows more opportunity to settle favorably.