24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196




When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Nevada Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Understanding Nevada Federal Sentencing Guidelines

The Basics of Federal Sentencing Guidelines

First things first – what exactly are the federal sentencing guidelines? In a nutshell, they are a set of rules and principles used by judges to determine the punishment for defendants convicted of federal crimes. The goal is to promote consistency and fairness in sentencing across different cases and jurisdictions.The guidelines take into account two main factors:

  1. The severity of the offense
  2. The defendant’s criminal history

Based on these elements, the guidelines provide a recommended sentencing range, usually expressed in months of imprisonment. For example, an offense level of 22 and a criminal history category of I might yield a guideline range of 41-51 months. It’s important to note that while judges must consider the guidelines, they are not bound by them. In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Booker that the guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. This means judges have discretion to impose sentences outside the recommended range if they feel it’s warranted based on the specific circumstances of the case.

Offense Levels and Severity

One of the key components of the federal sentencing guidelines is the offense level. This is a numerical value that reflects the seriousness of the crime. The higher the offense level, the more severe the recommended sentence. Offense levels are determined by looking at the base offense level for the crime, which is then adjusted up or down based on specific offense characteristics. For example, the base offense level for robbery is 20, but if a firearm was used, the level would increase by 5.

Here are some of the most common federal crimes prosecuted in Nevada and their typical offense levels:

  • Drug Trafficking: Offense levels vary based on drug type and quantity, but can range from 6 to 38.
  • Fraud: Base offense level of 7, with increases based on the amount of loss and other factors.
  • Firearms Offenses: Varies widely depending on the specific offense, criminal history, and characteristics of the firearm.
  • Child Pornography: Offense levels are quite high, often 28 or above, with enhancements for factors like distribution and the age of victims.

Of course, this is just a small sampling – the guidelines cover a huge range of federal offenses. The key takeaway is that the offense level is a crucial factor in determining the ultimate sentence.

Criminal History and Its Impact

The other major element in the federal sentencing calculus is the defendant’s criminal history category. This is essentially a way of quantifying the person’s prior record and using that to adjust the sentencing range. There are six criminal history categories, labeled I through VI. Category I is for defendants with little to no criminal record, while Category VI is reserved for those with very extensive criminal histories. Points are assigned for prior convictions based on factors like:

  • The length of previous sentences
  • Whether the current offense was committed while on probation or parole
  • The time elapsed since the prior offenses

So for example, a defendant with two prior convictions resulting in 6 month jail sentences would likely be in Category II, while someone with multiple felony convictions and a history of parole violations might be in Category V or VI. The higher the criminal history category, the more severe the recommended sentence will be. So a defendant with an offense level of 22 and a Category I criminal history might face 41-51 months, while the same offense coupled with a Category VI record could mean 84-105 months. It’s worth noting that in some cases, having a very minor criminal record can actually work against defendants under the guidelines. This is because for certain offenses, the guidelines recommend more leniency for those with literally zero criminal history points than for those with 1 or 2 points. Consulting with an experienced federal defense attorney can help you understand how your specific criminal history will factor into your potential sentence.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Departures and Variances

While the offense level and criminal history form the backbone of the federal sentencing guidelines, they are not the end of the story. Judges can depart from the guidelines or vary from them in certain circumstances. Departures are adjustments to the sentencing range based on factors that are specifically mentioned in the guidelines themselves. These can be upward departures (increasing the sentence) or downward departures (decreasing it). Some common grounds for departure include:

  • Substantial assistance to authorities (5K1.1)
  • Coercion and duress (5K2.12)
  • Diminished capacity (5K2.13)
  • Voluntary disclosure of offense (5K2.16)

Variances, on the other hand, are not based on specific guideline provisions but rather on the judge’s assessment of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. These are broad considerations like the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history and characteristics of the defendant, the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense and provide just punishment, and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities.In deciding whether to vary from the guidelines, judges often look at mitigating factors like:

  • The defendant’s age, health, and family circumstances
  • Lack of guidance as a youth
  • Efforts at rehabilitation or post-offense conduct
  • Remorse and acceptance of responsibility

Of course, aggravating factors can also support upward variances in some cases. Judges have significant discretion in this area, which is why it’s so important to present the most compelling mitigation case possible if you are facing federal sentencing.

Putting It All Together

Okay, so we’ve covered the key ingredients of federal sentencing – offense levels, criminal history, departures, and variances. But how do they all fit together in practice? Let’s walk through a hypothetical example to illustrate. Imagine a defendant named John who is convicted of wire fraud in federal court in Nevada. The amount of loss is determined to be $250,000. John has one prior conviction for a state-level fraud offense for which he served 8 months in prison.Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how John’s sentencing range would be calculated under the guidelines:

  1. Start with the base offense level for wire fraud, which is 7.
  2. Add 12 levels for the amount of loss over $250,000 (see 2B1.1(b)(1)(G)).
  3. The adjusted offense level is 19 (7 + 12).
  4. John’s prior 8-month sentence equals 2 criminal history points, placing him in Category II.
  5. The guideline range for offense level 19 and Category II is 33-41 months.

So absent any departures or variances, John would be looking at a sentence of around 3 years. However, let’s say he cooperated with the government and provided substantial assistance in prosecuting other participants in the fraud scheme. The judge might then depart downward to offense level 15, which yields a range of 21-27 months. But the judge might also feel that John’s personal circumstances, like his strong family ties and efforts at rehabilitation, warrant a variance below the guidelines. In that case, the judge could impose a sentence of, say, 18 months, even though that’s outside the guideline range. Of course, this is just one hypothetical – in reality, the specific calculations and outcomes will vary widely based on the unique facts of each case. But hopefully this gives you a general sense of how the pieces fit together.

The Role of Plea Bargaining

In the federal system, the vast majority of cases are resolved through plea bargains rather than trials. This means that the sentencing guidelines come into play not just after a conviction at trial, but also in the context of plea negotiations. Prosecutors and defense attorneys will often use the guidelines as a starting point for discussing potential sentences as part of a plea deal. For example, the prosecutor might agree to recommend a sentence at the low end of the guideline range in exchange for the defendant’s guilty plea. In some cases, the parties might even agree to a specific sentence or sentencing range as part of the plea agreement, known as a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) deal. If the judge accepts the agreement, they are bound to impose a sentence within that range. However, it’s important to remember that even in the plea bargaining context, the guidelines are just that – guidelines. Judges retain the ultimate discretion to impose a sentence they feel is appropriate, even if it differs from what the parties agreed to. That’s why it’s so crucial to have an experienced federal defense lawyer who can negotiate effectively and advocate for your interests at sentencing.

Navigating the Federal Sentencing Process

If you’re facing federal sentencing in Nevada, the process can feel overwhelming and confusing. But remember, you don’t have to go through it alone. Working with a skilled federal defense attorney can make all the difference in achieving the best possible outcome. Your lawyer can help you understand how the guidelines apply to your specific case and what factors might support a downward departure or variance. They can also negotiate with prosecutors to try to reach a favorable plea agreement and advocate for you at sentencing.Some key steps in navigating the federal sentencing process include:

  1. Review the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) carefully. This document, prepared by the probation office, will include a detailed analysis of the guidelines as they apply to your case. Your lawyer can object to any errors or argue for favorable interpretations.
  2. Gather mitigating evidence. This can include character letters, evidence of good deeds or rehabilitation efforts, and expert evaluations addressing mental health or substance abuse issues. Your lawyer can help identify the most persuasive mitigating factors in your case.
  3. Prepare a sentencing memorandum. This written document is submitted to the judge before sentencing and lays out the defense’s arguments for a favorable sentence. It’s a crucial opportunity to humanize you and tell your story beyond just the guidelines calculations.
  4. Advocate at the sentencing hearing. At the hearing itself, your lawyer can argue for departures or variances and respond to any arguments from the prosecution. You will also have an opportunity to address the court directly if you choose.

Remember, while the federal sentencing guidelines are an important factor, they are not the only consideration. Judges also look at the unique circumstances of each defendant and case in crafting an appropriate sentence. The more effectively you can present your story and the context behind your actions, the better your chances of a favorable outcome.

Schedule Your Consultation Now