24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Mandatory Minimums in Federal Drug Cases

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

 

Mandatory Minimums in Federal Drug Cases: An Unjust Reality

Sentencing laws for federal drug crimes have been controversial for decades. Specifically, mandatory minimum sentences have faced scrutiny from legal experts, judges, advocacy groups, and more. But what exactly are mandatory minimums and why are they so controversial when it comes to federal drug cases? This article will break it down.

Mandatory minimum sentences are basically what they sound like – minimum prison terms that judges are required to impose if someone is convicted of certain federal crimes, primarily drug offenses. So for example, if you’re convicted of trafficking over 500 grams of cocaine, there’s a 5 year mandatory minimum sentence. The judge has no discretion to give a lower sentence, even if they think 5 years is excessive based on the circumstances.

These mandatory minimums have been around since the War on Drugs really ramped up in the 1980s and 90s. The idea was to get tough on drug crimes by setting really harsh sentences that would deter people from committing them. But in reality, mandatory minimums have caused a lot more harm than good when it comes to fairness and justice in federal drug cases.

Unjust Punishments

One huge criticism of federal mandatory minimums is that they can result in punishments that are unjustly severe compared to the actual crime. Judges’ hands are tied and they’re forced to give overly harsh sentences even when they strongly disagree with the mandatory minimum.

There are countless real life examples of this. Take the case of Fate Winslow – a homeless man struggling with mental illness who acted as a go-between in two $20 marijuana sales and ended up with a life sentence due to prior convictions triggering mandatory enhancements (his sentenced was later commuted by the governor) . Or Richard Paey, a paraplegic man given a 25 year mandatory minimum sentence for obtaining painkillers through misrepresentation to treat his chronic pain.

These kinds of inverted sentencing scenarios – where less serious crimes receive harsher punishments than violent offenses like rape or murder – understandably shock the conscience. They demonstrate how unjust and irrational mandatory minimums can be.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Disproportionate Impact on Minorities

Another major criticism of federal mandatory minimums is that they disproportionately impact minority groups, especially Black Americans. This contributes to racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

For example, the average sentence for a Black defendant convicted of a federal crack cocaine offense has been found to be 44% longer than a white defendant convicted of a comparable crime. Studies have shown that mandatory minimums for drug crimes are one of the key drivers of these unequal outcomes.

So in effect, mandatory minimums enable systemic racism in federal drug sentencing. Not because judges or prosecutors are intentionally discriminatory, but because of how the mandatory sentencing structure is set up. There are complex historical, social and economic reasons why minorities have higher rates of certain drug convictions. But the end result is unjustly long sentences that reinforce existing racial inequities.

Other Consequences

Beyond unjust sentences and racial disparities, mandatory minimums have other consequences as well:

  • They contribute to overcrowded prisons and mass incarceration
  • They give prosecutors too much leverage in plea negotiations, resulting in false testimony
  • They limit judges’ ability to properly consider mitigating factors and circumstances
  • They sometimes punish peripheral crimes like possession or conspiracy more harshly than violent crimes
  • They result in huge costs for taxpayers

So in many ways, federal mandatory minimums make the criminal justice system less effective and less fair overall.

Reform Efforts

In recent years, there’s been a growing bipartisan movement to reform mandatory minimum sentencing laws. Groups like Families Against Mandatory Minimums have led advocacy efforts. Some progress has been made, like the expansion of the “safety valve” that allows judges to bypass mandatory minimums for low level offenders.

But significant reform is still needed. Bills like the Smarter Sentencing Act aim to scale back mandatory sentences so judges have more discretion. Some lawmakers argue the laws should be completely repealed. Resistance remains strong among some tough-on-crime politicians. So it’s an ongoing debate.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the original intent of federal mandatory minimums may have been admirable – getting tough on dangerous drug crimes – they’ve clearly had many unjust consequences over decades of implementation. From inverted sentencing, to racial disparities, to overcrowded prisons, the laws have ultimately done more harm than good.

Going forward, the criminal justice system must work to reduce over-reliance on mandatory minimums. Instead, judges should be empowered to consider the complex circumstances of each case and make fair decisions based on the principles of justice, rehabilitation and public safety. There’s no quick fix, as reforms face political and institutional resistance. But continuing the advocacy and policy efforts around federal sentencing reform remains urgent and important.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now