Criminal Defense Lawyers

How Lawyers Avoid Convictions for Healthcare Embezzlement

How Lawyers Help Clients Avoid Convictions for Healthcare Embezzlement

Healthcare embezzlement cases can be complex. There are often gray areas around billing practices and interpretations of rules. Skilled defense lawyers use this complexity to raise doubt and avoid convictions for their clients.

Understanding Motivations Behind Healthcare Fraud

Most cases of healthcare fraud are driven by financial pressures, not malicious intent. Doctors struggle with high medical school debt or low insurance reimbursements. The system incentivizes overbilling and encourages cutting corners.While fraud is still illegal, many defendants feel they had no choice. Smart lawyers humanize clients, helping judges and juries empathize with tough situations. They note extreme financial or family pressures, contrasting these with otherwise upstanding careers. This seeds doubt and makes conviction less palatable.

Attacking Faulty Investigations

Sloppy investigations offer lawyers opportunities to undermine the prosecution’s case. Common issues include:

• Relying solely on whistleblower complaints without further scrutiny
• Failing to analyze industry billing norms before alleging “excessive” charges
• Not accounting for honest mistakes in a complex system

Savvy lawyers highlight these flaws. For example, billing for 30 minute appointments when they lasted 25 minutes. While technically incorrect, this may be an industry norm caused by scheduling constraints. By showing the prosecution’s standards are unreasonable or industry practices were misunderstood, the defense raises doubts.

Leveraging Complex Billing Rules

Healthcare billing regulations are notoriously complex. Doctors struggle to properly code for services across hundreds of insurance plans. There are few industry standards.

Smart lawyers leverage this complexity. They highlight gray areas around proper coding and billing rules across various payers. The tiny details that constitute fraud become obscured in mountains of paperwork. Again this creates doubt – was the billing incorrect or just a coding mistake?

Using Technicalities and Procedure

Beyond attacking the merit of allegations, lawyers rely on technicalities and procedure to avoid convictions. Common approaches include:

• Suppressing Evidence: Evidence gathered without a warrant or proper cause can be suppressed. This may gut the prosecution’s case.
• Discrediting Witnesses: Witness testimony can be excluded if improperly vetted. Their credibility can also be attacked over bias or inconsistencies.
• Exploiting Time Limits: Legal time limits to bring charges may have expired due to delays, allowing charges to be dismissed.

While these don’t prove innocence, they successfully exploit the legal system to benefit defendants.

Encouraging Settlements

Settlements allow defendants to avoid the risk and publicity of trial. The government also saves resources by settling. Lawyers leverage this mutual incentive, pushing for settlements with reduced penalties.

Tactics to enable settlement include:

• Demonstrating financial hardship: This shows the defendant cannot afford a costly legal battle or survive a guilty verdict.
• Threatening an aggressive defense: By demonstrating the prosecution faces an uphill legal battle, the defense brings them to the table.
• Providing restitution: Repaying embezzled funds makes settlement more palatable for authorities.

Over 90% of federal fraud cases settle – a testament to the effectiveness of these techniques.

Navigating Sentencing

If conviction occurs, skilled lawyers minimize sentencing length and severity. They petition for home confinement instead of prison by utilizing:

• Community Ties: Long-term employment, volunteer work and family connections encourage alternatives to incarceration.
• Remorse and Restitution: Admissions of guilt and repaying stolen money lighten sentences.
• Health Issues: Medical problems may allow defendants to serve sentences under home monitoring.

Lawyers also leverage sentencing guidelines to reduce prison time. Factors like limited criminal history, age, and family obligations are considered. Passionate advocacy shapes how these are applied.

Understanding Common Defenses

When fighting embezzlement charges directly, several legal defenses are employed:

Lack of Criminal Intent: Prosecutors must demonstrate willful, criminal intent – not just mistakes. Showing a defendant acted in good faith raises doubts over intent.

Authorization: Defendants may claim billing activities were approved by supervisors or align with internal policies. This authorization vindicates them.

Industry Customs: As mentioned earlier, widespread industry customs around billing may excuse borderline fraudulent activities.

Blaming Underlings: Executives try shifting blame to staffers, arguing they were unaware of illicit activities occurring under their watch.

Cooperation and Compliance: Highlighting extensive compliance programs and cooperating with authorities often wins sentencing leniency.

How Lawyers Strengthen Defenses

Lawyers don’t just present defenses. They actively strengthen them by:

Coaching Clients: Thoroughly prepping clients for interviews and testimony helps align stories and ensure favorable facts are highlighted.

Scrutinizing Records: Meticulously reviewing medical and billing records uncovers helpful evidence and billing complexities. Exculpatory details get emphasized.

Consulting Experts: Billing, coding and compliance experts are retained. They identify technicalities and industry customs benefiting the defense.

Investigating Independently: Without relying solely on prosecution files, lawyers dig deeper to uncover issues with whistleblowers, witnesses and evidence collection.

Through meticulous preparation, lawyers piece together nuanced arguments across regulations, intents, authorizations and industry norms. Each fragment on its own may seem trivial. Skillfully woven together by experienced counsel, they form imposing barriers to conviction.

Why Avoiding Conviction Matters

The consequences of healthcare fraud convictions are severe, including:

• Prison sentences up to 10 years
• Asset forfeiture
• Massive fines up to $250,000 per count
• Lifetime exclusion from Medicare/Medicaid
• Loss of medical license

Even if charges get reduced, settlements carry stiff penalties. And once convicted, the stigma and professional damage rarely washes away.

With livelihoods and reputations on the line, mounting an aggressive defense is imperative. Lawyers adept at sowing doubt and humanizing clients offer the best chance to avoid convictions. And in many cases, that small shred of doubt makes all the difference.

References