24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196




When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

How Federal Defense Lawyers Investigate Federal Agents and Prosecutors


Federal defense lawyers play a critical role in investigating federal agents and prosecutors. As advocates for individuals facing federal charges, defense lawyers have an ethical obligation to vigorously defend their clients. This means leaving no stone unturned in scrutinizing the government’s case.Defense lawyers have a range of methods for investigating agents and prosecutors. These include formal discovery, informal information gathering, legal motions, and complaints to oversight bodies. Used properly, these techniques can uncover government misconduct, mistakes, overreach, and bias. This levels the playing field for defendants and leads to fairer outcomes.

Formal Discovery

The most basic investigative method is formal discovery under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. These rules require federal prosecutors to disclose certain categories of information to the defense. This includes the defendant’s statements, documents and objects material to preparing the defense, and information that could impeach government witnesses 1

.Discovery is crucial for understanding the prosecution’s theory of the case. But defense lawyers often have to fight for full disclosure. Prosecutors frequently take narrow views of their obligations or drag their feet. When this happens, defense lawyers file discovery motions to compel broader disclosures. Judges tend to give prosecutors the benefit of the doubt, but persistent advocacy can shake loose important information 2.

Informal Information Gathering

Defense lawyers also gather information through informal channels. They interview potential witnesses with no connection to the government’s case. They track down leads and collect documents on their own. And they consult with private investigators, forensic experts, and other specialists to explore weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence 3.

Informal investigations aim to find exculpatory evidence and witnesses. These discoveries can then be leveraged to undermine the credibility of government agents and prosecutors 4. 

Even if informal methods don’t produce blockbuster revelations, they generate information for cross-examining government witnesses.

Legal Motions

Defense lawyers frequently file legal motions targeting perceived deficiencies in the government’s case. Common examples include motions to suppress evidence, dismiss charges, disclose exculpatory evidence, and reveal confidential informants 5.

These motions serve both tactical and investigative purposes. They preview defense arguments, probe for information, and test the thoroughness of government agents and prosecutors. Even if unsuccessful, motions signal that the defense will hold the government accountable at every turn.

Complaints to Oversight Bodies

When government misconduct comes to light, defense lawyers can file complaints with oversight bodies. At the federal level, these include courts, Congress, the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and agency inspectors general. State bar associations also investigate allegations of prosecutorial misconduct.Complaints can trigger formal investigations into agent or prosecutor wrongdoing. If substantiated, this can lead to professional discipline or even criminal charges. The threat of sanctions deters future misconduct and encourages better compliance with disclosure rules.

Common Investigative Targets

Defense lawyers zero in on certain areas where government agents and prosecutors are prone to missteps or questionable conduct. These include:

Warrants and Affidavits

Defense lawyers scrutinize warrant applications and supporting affidavits. Technical defects can lead to suppression of evidence. Clear omissions, errors, or material misstatements may indicate sloppy police work or even perjury. This undercuts agent credibility and the integrity of the underlying investigation.

Informants and Cooperators

Informants and cooperating witnesses are wildcards for both sides. Defense lawyers dig into their backgrounds, motives, and relationship with handlers. Any benefits received in exchange for cooperation, or signs of unreliability, supply fodder for cross-examination.

Forensic Analysis

With scientific evidence playing an increasing role, defense lawyers take a hard look at forensic analysis. They explore analysts’ qualifications, accreditation of labs, testing methodology, error rates, and proficiency. Sloppy forensics cast doubt on both individual examiners and institutional controls.

Electronic Surveillance

Defense lawyers carefully analyze any electronic surveillance used in an investigation. They check for misstatements in wiretap affidavits, minimization violations, improper data sharing, and other deficiencies. Suppression may result if statutory requirements are not strictly followed.

Discovery Violations

Late or incomplete discovery feeds suspicions that the government is hiding information. Defense lawyers pounce on discovery violations to argue for sanctions, like dismissing charges or excluding evidence. Repeated violations indicate willful obstruction versus mere oversight.

Media Leaks

Defense lawyers monitor for prejudicial leaks of non-public information to the media. They explore whether leaks can be traced to specific agents or prosecutors. Publicizing leaks puts pressure on judges to protect defendants’ right to an impartial jury.

Why Investigation Matters

Vigorous investigation of federal agents and prosecutors serves three key purposes:

Deterring Misconduct

Shining a light on government missteps deters future misconduct. When agents and prosecutors know their work will undergo close scrutiny, they have added incentive to follow protocols.

Revealing Weaknesses

Investigation exposes factual holes, analytical errors, bias, overreach, and other vulnerabilities. These revelations provide openings to challenge the overall strength and fairness of the government’s case.

Furthering Justice

Most fundamentally, investigating the government upholds due process and the search for truth. As Justice Louis Brandeis famously wrote, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.” Nowhere is this truer than in defending those accused by the state.


Investigating federal agents and prosecutors levels an uneven playing field. It advances the truth-seeking mission of criminal justice. And it ultimately produces fairer outcomes for all involved. As Brandeis might say, letting the sun shine in makes the whole system healthier.







https://www.law360.com/articles/1087386/how-defense-attys-can-get-evidence-through-pretrial-motions https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/resources/report_archive/darcy2017/
https://www.nacdl.org/getattachment/a92d7c30-ecb4-48b5-9d33-a0f50a31c3c3/discoveryreformreport_final.pdf https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-24000-confidential-informants https://www.nacdl.org/getattachment/a92d7c30-ecb4-48b5-9d33-a0f50a31c3c3/discoveryreformreport_final.pdf
https://www.law360.com/articles/1087386/how-defense-attys-can-get-evidence-through-pretrial-motions https://www.rcfp.org/journals/news-media-and-law-fall-2017/leaks-federal-criminal-investigations/
https://www.nacdl.org/getattachment/a92d7c30-ecb4-48b5-9d33-a0f50a31c3c3/discoveryreformreport_final.pdf https://louisville.edu/law/library/special-collections/the-louis-d.-brandeis-collection/business-a-profession-chapter-15

Schedule Your Consultation Now