24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

FCPA Violations: Navigating Parallel SEC and DOJ Investigations

FCPA Violations: Navigating Parallel SEC and DOJ Investigations

In recent years, enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) has become a high priority for both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) [1]. Companies found to be in violation of the FCPA’s anti-bribery, books and records, and internal accounting controls provisions often face parallel civil and criminal investigations by the SEC and DOJ.

For companies under investigation, navigating these parallel proceedings can be challenging. This article provides an overview of key considerations when facing concurrent FCPA investigations by the SEC and DOJ.

The FCPA: A Brief Background

The FCPA, enacted in 1977, prohibits companies issuing stock in the U.S. from bribing foreign officials to obtain or retain business [3]. Specifically, the anti-bribery provisions prohibit the payment of money or anything of value to foreign officials to influence an act or decision to obtain or retain business. The accounting provisions require companies to maintain accurate books and records as well as sufficient internal controls.

Violations of the FCPA can result in civil and criminal penalties. The SEC pursues civil enforcement actions seeking injunctions and monetary penalties, while the DOJ pursues criminal charges against both companies and individuals.

The Investigative Process

Investigations into potential FCPA violations often begin when companies voluntarily self-disclose potential issues to the SEC or DOJ. They can also commence after receiving a whistleblower tip or referral from another government agency.

In formal investigations, the SEC and DOJ have broad authority to issue subpoenas for documents and testimony. They often coordinate efforts by sharing information and resources. However, each agency makes independent charging decisions based on its own policies and procedures.

DOJ Investigations

DOJ FCPA investigations are conducted primarily by prosecutors from the Fraud Section of the Criminal Division and local U.S. Attorney’s Offices. Typical steps include:

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.
  • Issuing document and testimony subpoenas
  • Reviewing email communications, financial records, and other documents
  • Interviewing witnesses and subjects
  • Working with FBI agents to gather facts and evidence
  • Consulting with SEC attorneys and sharing information
  • Determining whether to bring criminal charges

SEC Investigations

The SEC Division of Enforcement conducts FCPA investigations through its specialized FCPA Unit. Typical steps include:

  • Issuing formal order of investigation
  • Requesting documents through voluntary submission or subpoena
  • Taking sworn testimony from witnesses and subjects
  • Consulting with DOJ attorneys and sharing information
  • Determining whether to recommend an enforcement action

Resolving Parallel Investigations

Over 90% of corporate FCPA enforcement actions involve simultaneous settlements with the SEC and DOJ [2]. There are several potential resolution vehicles:

Non-Prosecution and Deferred Prosecution Agreements (NPAs and DPAs)

These are agreements with DOJ where charges are deferred (DPAs) or not filed (NPAs) in exchange for meeting certain conditions like paying penalties, cooperating, and instituting compliance measures. DPAs and NPAs avoid a criminal conviction but require admission of wrongdoing.

Plea Agreements

DOJ may enter plea agreements with companies where they plead guilty to criminal charges in exchange for an agreed-upon sentence. This results in a criminal conviction.

SEC Injunctive Actions

The SEC frequently institutes civil injunctive actions for FCPA violations. Companies agree to an injunction barring future violations without admitting or denying the allegations and pay civil penalties.

Coordinating Resolutions

The SEC and DOJ typically coordinate resolutions and issue public announcements on the same day. Settlement amounts are also coordinated to avoid excessive combined penalties.

However, each agency operates independently. It is possible to reach a resolution with one agency but not the other if discussions break down.

Mitigating Potential FCPA Violations

When facing an FCPA investigation, companies can take certain steps to mitigate potential penalties:

  • Voluntary self-disclosure: Promptly notifying DOJ and SEC of potential misconduct can lead to substantially reduced penalties [4].
  • Cooperation: Fully cooperating with investigators by providing all relevant facts can yield favorable treatment.
  • Remediation: Implementing an effective compliance program with proper controls demonstrates a commitment to preventing future violations.
  • Disciplinary measures: Appropriately disciplining employees involved in misconduct shows recognition of the seriousness of the issues.

Taking these steps will not prevent charges altogether. However, DOJ and SEC will consider them as mitigating factors when determining appropriate resolutions and penalties.

Individual Accountability

In recent years, DOJ has emphasized prosecuting responsible individuals in addition to companies. In 2022, DOJ brought FCPA-related charges against 12 individuals [4]

In recent years, DOJ has emphasized prosecuting responsible individuals in addition to companies. In 2022, DOJ brought FCPA-related charges against 12 individuals [4].

This focus on individual accountability represents a major shift in DOJ’s approach to corporate crime. For many years, settlements with companies were the norm while executives and employees avoided charges. However, DOJ now recognizes that holding individuals accountable is critical to deterring misconduct.

There are several key reasons why DOJ is pursuing more individuals in FCPA cases:

  • Personal deterrence – Prosecuting individuals has a stronger deterrent effect than just settling with companies.
  • Public accountability – Charging executives and employees shows the public that individuals who break laws will face consequences.
  • Cooperation incentives – Charging individuals gives them incentive to cooperate with investigations and provide evidence against others.
  • Corporate culture change – Removing responsible executives can help reshape corporate culture and prevent future violations.

While most FCPA cases still end in corporate settlements, the uptick in individual prosecutions represents a major enforcement trend. Companies and executives must recognize that both are now squarely in the crosshairs of FCPA investigations.

Schedule Your Consultation Now