24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Evaluating the Particularity of Subpoenas for Digital Evidence

Evaluating the Particularity of Subpoenas for Digital Evidence

Law enforcement agencies are increasingly relying on digital evidence to investigate crimes in the modern era. However, the use of digital evidence raises complex legal issues regarding privacy and the scope of subpoenas. This article examines the debate over how to balance law enforcement needs with civil liberties when issuing subpoenas for digital information.

The Rise of Digital Evidence

With the proliferation of smartphones, social media, cloud storage and other technologies, digital evidence such as text messages, emails, photos, search histories, and location data has become ubiquitous in criminal cases. Studies show that digital evidence is now involved in most investigations.

This has created tremendous opportunities for law enforcement to access information that can help reconstruct events and identify perpetrators. However, it also poses new challenges for prosecutors in learning how to gather and utilize digital evidence effectively.

Overbroad Subpoenas

A key issue is that subpoenas for digital evidence often demand an enormous breadth of information from tech companies like Google, Facebook and Apple.

For instance, prosecutors sometimes issue subpoenas seeking “any and all records” related to a particular account. This could encompass years’ worth of highly personal information.

Defense attorneys argue that such broad subpoenas violate the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment, which states that warrants must “particularly describ[e] the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The Stored Communications Act

However, prosecutors contend that subpoenas for digital evidence are governed by the Stored Communications Act (SCA), not the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirements.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

The SCA allows the government to compel tech companies to hand over customer records with a subpoena, which has a lower legal threshold than a warrant.

Courts have been divided on whether the SCA provides sufficient privacy protections regarding digital evidence.

Notable Cases

In United States v. Warshak (2010), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the SCA’s subpoena provisions violate the Fourth Amendment for emails, given their “highly personal” nature. However, this ruling only applies within the Sixth Circuit’s jurisdiction.

In contrast, in SEC v. Graham (2014), the Ninth Circuit upheld a subpoena under the SCA for a wide range of digital documents. But it cautioned that requests must avoid seeking information that is “unreasonably voluminous.”

Particularity Requirement

These cases illustrate the need for limits when issuing subpoenas for digital evidence. While law enforcement has legitimate needs, courts are increasingly recognizing that privacy rights must be balanced against those needs.

One solution is to impose a heightened particularity requirement for digital subpoenas. This would compel prosecutors to narrowly tailor requests to specific time periods, services, communication partners and other factors.

Defense attorneys argue this would prevent “fishing expeditions” through people’s digital lives while allowing relevant evidence to be obtained.

Reasonable Compromise

A reasonable compromise could require prosecutors to meet a standard such as “reasonable particularity” when subpoenaing digital records. This is less strict than a warrant, but goes beyond the SCA’s minimal requirements.

With this approach, subpoenas that clearly identify targeted information over a reasonable timeframe would be valid. But open-ended demands for “any and all records” would not.

Conclusion

Digital evidence is a vital tool for law enforcement, but it also contains highly sensitive details about people’s lives. Courts need to strike the right balance between these competing interests.

Imposing a heightened particularity standard for digital subpoenas would allow police to access relevant evidence for investigations, while also placing reasonable limits on government power. This would help safeguard Fourth Amendment protections in the digital age.

References

Schedule Your Consultation Now