Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Receiving a civil investigative demand (CID) from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can be concerning for any business. A CID is essentially a subpoena seeking information related to an FTC investigation into potential unlawful conduct. While receipt of a CID does not necessarily mean the FTC will file a lawsuit, it does warrant taking the demand seriously and considering implementing a litigation hold.
According to the FTC, a CID is “a kind of subpoena – a legal document enforceable in court that seeks documents or other information related to an FTC investigation. The FTC issues CIDs to obtain information from companies it suspects may have violated consumer protection laws or antitrust regulations. CIDs may also be sent to third parties not directly under investigation but who may have relevant information.
CIDs typically require the recipient to provide documents, tangible items, written reports, answers to interrogatories, and/or oral testimony. The demands have specified deadlines for compliance, with extensions needing to be negotiated with the FTC. Failure to adequately respond can result in the FTC seeking a court order to compel compliance.
One of the first steps upon receiving a CID should be to implement a litigation hold to preserve documents and information relevant to responding to the demand. As advised by legal experts, “It is important that the hold covers the full responsive period set-out in the CID as well ensuring all relevant individuals that may have responsive documents and information receive the litigation hold.”
The purpose of a litigation hold is to prevent the destruction of any materials requested by the CID or that may be relevant to the FTC’s investigation. This includes suspending any routine document destruction policies. The hold should clearly indicate what types of documents need to be retained and the date range covered. Relevant personnel should be informed of their duty to preserve pertinent records.
The grounds for challenging CIDs in court are limited. Potential bases include that the demand:
However, courts generally defer to the FTC’s discretion in issuing CIDs. Meetings with FTC staff provide the best opportunity to clarify and potentially narrow the scope of demands. Experienced legal counsel can assist with evaluating objection grounds and negotiation strategies.
While concerning, receipt of a CID does not necessarily mean the FTC intends to sue. As explained by FTC staff:
In some instances, once FTC staff has reviewed the documents a company provides in response to a CID, the agency will close the investigation without further action. In other instances, staff will approach the company about negotiating a possible legal settlement. If a company doesn’t reach a settlement agreement, the Commission may decide to file a lawsuit.
Cooperating with the investigation and submitting a well-crafted white paper making the case for closing the inquiry may convince regulators that enforcement action is unwarranted.
In the event the FTC does file a complaint in federal court, the Commission has a range of remedies at its disposal, including:
In some cases, the FTC may refer matters to criminal authorities if unlawful acts involve fraud or deceit.
In summary, while receipt of an FTC CID is not an automatic trigger for litigation, implementing a comprehensive litigation hold is a prudent safeguard to preserve documents and comply with the demand. Experienced regulatory counsel can help recipients assess the scope of the inquiry, raise viable challenges, craft persuasive responses, and negotiate with FTC staff – all with an eye toward avoiding subsequent enforcement litigation.
The article covers key considerations around FTC civil investigative demands and litigation holds, including:
What a CID is and what information it seeks
When implementing a litigation hold is advisable
Limited grounds for challenging demands
Possibility of closing investigation or settlement
Remedies available if FTC files suit
Importance of experienced regulatory counsel
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.