Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
So you just got a civil investigative demand (CID) from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Don’t panic! Here’s a plain English guide on what it is, what your rights and responsibilities are, and tips on responding appropriately.
A CID is basically a subpoena that the FTC uses to obtain information during investigations into potentially unfair or deceptive business practices. It requires you to provide documents, written reports, answers to interrogatories, or oral testimony related to the investigation.The FTC doesn’t need to get a court order to issue a CID – they can serve one on their own authority. And you usually can’t quash or modify a CID, so compliance is mandatory unless there’s a legal basis for challenging it.
There’s a few reasons you may have received a CID:
Either way, don’t assume you’re in trouble yet. CIDs are a normal part of the FTC’s investigative process to determine if consumer harm occurred before deciding whether to initiate an enforcement action.
You must retain all relevant documents and suspend any routine destruction policies. This includes paper and electronic records, like emails.Assign a point person to handle the CID response. They’ll need to oversee the collection and review process across departments like marketing, IT, customer service, etc.You must respond fully and accurately within the deadline, which is typically 30 days or less. The FTC does not easily grant extensions.If you withhold or destroy requested materials, provide incomplete or evasive answers, or fail to meet the deadline, you risk facing an obstruction of justice charge with civil penalties or contempt of court.
You have the right to challenge aspects of the CID if you believe they are unduly burdensome or outside the FTC’s authority. But the grounds for doing so are limited.For example, you may petition to quash or limit the CID if it requires revealing trade secrets or confidential information that is irrelevant to the investigation. But such petitions rarely succeed entirely, so expect negotiation at best.You also have rights when it comes to oral testimony. You can have an attorney present, get transcripts, and assert privileges.In some cases, you may be able to seek judicial intervention against aspects of the CID. But the courts tend to side with the FTC’s broad investigative powers.
Here’s some key tips when served with an FTC civil investigative demand:Get organized immediatelyAs soon as you receive the CID, begin coordinating a response team including legal, IT, records management, and relevant business units. Suspend any routine document destruction policies. Start identifying where responsive materials reside while reviewing the specific requests.Assess possible exposuresHave counsel review the CID scope and determine areas of vulnerability related to your marketing claims, billing practices, data security, etc. Understanding potential legal risks will help guide the response strategy.Negotiate narrower requests if necessaryIf the CID seems overly broad or unduly burdensome, petition the FTC to narrow the scope. While success isn’t guaranteed, good faith negotiations can eliminate requests deemed irrelevant or disproportionate.Conduct a thorough yet efficient document searchCast a wide net across paper and electronic records to avoid charges of withholding documents. This includes searching personal files of key employees. But also use advanced analytics with keywords and data filtering to hone in on materials actually responsive to the CID.Carefully prepare interrogatory answersTreat interrogatories like a testifying witness would. Get all relevant stakeholders to review drafts. Check for consistency against document productions and other evidence. Incomplete or evasive answers may draw charges of obstruction.Consider voluntary cooperationIf violations occurred but were inadvertent or minor, self-reporting the issues and providing voluntary cooperation shows good faith. It may help secure a better settlement agreement or build credibility to push back against overreaching demands.Weigh the PR implicationsThe FTC tends to keep investigations confidential. But charges get publicized when complaints are filed. So consider developing a PR strategy in case the probe draws media attention, which could cause reputational damage even if the charges lack merit.
CIDs usually lead to one of four outcomes:
So if you received an FTC civil investigative demand, don’t stick your head in the sand. Take it seriously and ensure full compliance. But also understand it’s not necessarily an accusation. With proper legal guidance and an organized response, you can get through the probe intact even if changes to business practices are required. The key is avoiding missteps that turn a manageable investigation into protracted litigation.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.