Blog
What DEA Lawyers Look for When Evaluating Drug Crime Forensic Evidence
Contents
Introduction
When DEA lawyers are building a drug crime case, the forensic evidence is crucial. I mean, without solid proof tying the defendant to the crime, there’s no case, right? As a DEA attorney, I spend a lot of time poring over lab reports, crime scene photos, financial records – you name it. I’m looking for anything that can link the accused to the drugs.
It ain’t easy, lemme tell ya. These drug dealers and traffickers know how to cover their tracks. But they always slip up somewhere. My job is to find that slip up. In this article, I’ll walk you through exactly what I look for when evaluating forensic evidence in drug cases. Strap in – it’s about to get technical up in here!
Trace Evidence
Let’s start with trace evidence. This includes things like fingerprints, fibers, hair follicles – tiny pieces of physical evidence that can place a suspect at the scene. With drugs, I find trace evidence on the packaging like fingerprints on plastic baggies or hair caught in tape. I also examine the drugs themselves.
For example, if I find the defendant’s fingerprints on a brick of cocaine, it’s pretty damning evidence they handled the drugs. Tracing the origins of the packaging materials or drugs can also connect suspects to larger drug trafficking organizations. Like if the plastic baggies trace back to a distributor the Sinaloa Cartel is known to use, we can make that link.
I don’t expect trace evidence on every drug case. But when it’s there, it provides a solid connection between the defendant and the contraband.
Toxicology Reports
Toxicology reports are crucial for drug crimes, especially distribution charges. Chemical analysis of blood and urine samples can detect the presence – or absence – of illegal narcotics.
For example, if we arrest someone with 50 baggies of heroin, but their tox screen comes back clean, that supports intent to distribute rather than personal use. The lack of drugs in their system indicates they weren’t a user.
On the other hand, if someone’s arrested with a small amount of meth and their bloodwork shows high levels, that suggests personal use rather than dealing. Toxicology provides critical context that informs the prosecution strategy.
The science doesn’t lie – tox reports give objective proof of drug ingestion. I use them in nearly every drug case I handle.
Financial Records
Following the money trail is key in prosecuting large-scale drug trafficking. I subpoena bank records, credit card statements, wire transfers – anything that shows suspicious cash flow.
For example, if a suspected drug lord has huge sums flowing in and out of an offshore account, that’s a red flag. Or if someone’s depositing stacks of small bills – common in drug cash transactions – I can connect those dots.
Unexplained income that doesn’t match someone’s reported earnings is evidence of illegal activity. I work with forensic accountants to dig through confusing financial web and make sense of complex money trails. But ultimately, the money doesn’t lie. The records clearly trace drug profits and expose trafficking rings.
Electronic Evidence
Cell phones, computers, GPS devices – electronic records provide a trove of intel for drug cases. I subpoena a suspect’s call logs, emails, location history, search terms, everything.
Voicemails and texts can establish connections between co-conspirators. Emails often document drug transactions. Browser history shows research into manufacturing methods or purchase of equipment. Cell tower pings put a suspect at the scene of a drug deal.
And don’t get me started on encrypted messaging apps. Going through someone’s Signal or Telegram messages is like striking gold. Defendants think these apps shield communication, but with the right warrant, we crack that encryption every time.
Digital evidence brings drug operations into broad daylight. It’s an investigative goldmine, laying out the who, what, when, where for prosecutors.
Forensic Chemistry
As a DEA attorney, I rely heavily on forensic chemists to identify unknown substances seized during investigations. They analyze purity, cutting agents, manufacturing origin – all to establish evidence for trafficking charges.
For example, chemists can identify “signature” additives certain cartels use when pressing pills. Or they can trace heroin samples back to poppy fields in specific regions of Mexico. Forensic chemistry provides definitive proof of the substance identity, quantity, and origins.
Drug cases also involve reverse undercover buys where agents sell fake drugs to suspects. Later, forensic analysis verifies the purchased substance contained no illicit narcotics. Chemistry reports scientifically document the integrity of UC operations.
From confirming legitimate seizures to validating fake deals, the chemical analysis provides a foundation for successful drug prosecutions.
DNA Evidence
DNA is a powerful tool for linking suspects to drug evidence. Just like blood or semen can identify perpetrators in violent crimes, skin cell DNA on baggies and packaging tie defendants to dope.
For example, if a fingerprint isn’t clear enough for an identification, we can still match DNA swabbed from the plastic to our suspect. Or we test stray hairs caught in wrapped bricks of marijuana to determine who handled them during processing.
DNA evidence not only connects individuals to drugs, but also reveals relationships between traffickers. If multiple suspects’ DNA appears on the same contraband, it indicates a conspiracy. Testing genetic markers even exposes family ties between members of the same trafficking network.
Like a roadmap of genetic breadcrumbs, DNA forms an irrefutable association between dealers and drugs. It cements drug cases with scientific certainty.
Implications
The forensic evidence I evaluate has huge implications for drug cases. It provides definitive proof for distribution charges with lengthy sentences. Trace evidence of manufacturing can distinguish kingpins from street dealers. Toxicology reports classify suspects as users or traffickers.
Most importantly, forensics removes reasonable doubt – and gives tremendous leverage for plea negotiations. Even the strongest defense crumbles when the science irrefutably identifies someone as a major supplier.
Without forensics, drug cases devolve into he-said-she-said arguments. But physical evidence doesn’t lie. As technology improves, we gain even more potent tools for dismantling traffickers. The future of drug prosecution is forensics.