24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Washington Federal Sentencing Guidelines

March 29, 2024

Understanding the Washington Federal Sentencing Guidelines

If you’re facing federal criminal charges in Washington state, it’s crucial to understand how the Federal Sentencing Guidelines work. These guidelines provide a framework for judges to determine appropriate sentences based on the severity of the crime and the defendant‘s criminal history. In this article, we’ll break down the key aspects of the Washington Federal Sentencing Guidelines and discuss how an experienced federal criminal defense attorney can help navigate this complex system.

What are the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were created in 1987 to establish more consistent and fair sentencing practices across federal courts. The guidelines assign a base offense level to each crime, which is then adjusted based on specific characteristics of the offense and the defendant‘s criminal history. This calculation results in a sentencing range that judges use as a starting point when determining a sentence.It’s important to note that while judges must consider the guidelines, they are not bound by them. In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Booker that the guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory. This means judges have more discretion to depart from the recommended sentencing range when they believe it is appropriate.

How are sentences calculated under the guidelines?

To determine a sentence under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the court follows a multi-step process:

  1. Determine the base offense level: Each crime is assigned a base offense level, which reflects the seriousness of the offense. For example, according to the guidelines, drug trafficking offenses have base offense levels ranging from 6 to 38, depending on the type and quantity of drugs involved.
  2. Apply offense-specific enhancements: The base offense level may be increased or decreased based on specific characteristics of the crime, such as the use of a weapon, the amount of financial loss, or the defendant’s role in the offense.
  3. Determine the criminal history category: The defendant’s criminal history is assigned to one of six categories, with Category I being the least serious and Category VI being the most serious. This is based on the number and severity of prior convictions.
  4. Calculate the sentencing range: Using the Sentencing Table, the court determines the recommended sentencing range by finding the intersection of the offense level and criminal history category. For instance, an offense level of 22 and a criminal history category of III would result in a recommended sentence of 51-63 months.
  5. Consider departures and variances: The court may depart from the guidelines if there are aggravating or mitigating circumstances not adequately considered by the guidelines. Judges may also vary from the guidelines based on the factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), such as the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history and characteristics of the defendant, and the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense and provide just punishment.

Strategies for navigating the Federal Sentencing Guidelines

If you’re facing federal charges, it’s essential to work with a skilled criminal defense attorney who understands the complexities of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Here are some strategies your attorney may use to achieve the best possible outcome:

  • Negotiating a plea agreement: Many federal cases are resolved through plea bargains. Your attorney can negotiate with prosecutors to secure a favorable plea deal that reduces your offense level or includes a sentencing recommendation below the guidelines range.
  • Challenging enhancements: Your attorney may argue against the application of certain offense-specific enhancements that could increase your sentence. This may involve disputing the facts of the case or the legal basis for the enhancement.
  • Presenting mitigating evidence: Your attorney can present evidence of mitigating factors, such as your personal background, mental health issues, or efforts at rehabilitation, to persuade the judge to impose a sentence below the guidelines range.
  • Arguing for a downward departure or variance: If there are unique circumstances in your case that are not adequately considered by the guidelines, your attorney may argue for a downward departure or variance from the recommended sentence.

It’s worth noting that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines can be incredibly complex, with numerous provisions and exceptions. As a defendant, it’s crucial to have an attorney who is well-versed in these guidelines and can navigate them effectively on your behalf.

Real-world examples of the guidelines in action

To better understand how the Federal Sentencing Guidelines work in practice, let’s look at a few real-world examples:

  • In 2021, a Washington man was sentenced to 97 months in prison for drug and gun crimes. According to court documents, the defendant’s base offense level for the drug charge was 24, based on the quantity of methamphetamine involved. His criminal history category was IV, resulting in a guidelines range of 77-96 months. The judge imposed a sentence at the top of that range and added a consecutive 60-month sentence for the gun charge.
  • In a 2020 case, a Seattle man was sentenced to 5 years in prison for his role in a drug conspiracy. The defendant’s offense level was 27, and his criminal history category was III, resulting in a guidelines range of 87-108 months. However, the judge varied downward from the guidelines and imposed a 60-month sentence, citing the defendant’s difficult upbringing and his efforts to turn his life around.
  • In 2019, a Washington woman was sentenced to 18 months in prison for wire fraud and tax crimes related to her embezzlement from a nonprofit organization. The defendant’s offense level was 20, and her criminal history category was I, resulting in a guidelines range of 33-41 months. The judge departed downward from the guidelines based on the defendant’s acceptance of responsibility and her efforts to pay restitution.

These examples illustrate how the Federal Sentencing Guidelines provide a starting point for sentencing, but judges have the discretion to depart or vary from the recommended range based on the specific facts of the case and the individual defendant.

The importance of expert legal representation

Navigating the Federal Sentencing Guidelines is no easy feat, which is why it’s crucial to have an experienced federal criminal defense attorney on your side. At Spodek Law Group, our team of skilled attorneys has a deep understanding of the guidelines and a track record of success in federal cases.We understand that every case is unique, and we take the time to thoroughly investigate the facts and develop a personalized defense strategy for each client. Our attorneys are not afraid to challenge the government’s evidence, argue for reduced charges or sentencing enhancements, or present compelling mitigating evidence to secure the best possible outcome.When you work with Spodek Law Group, you can expect:

  • Extensive experience: Our attorneys have handled numerous federal cases and are well-versed in the complexities of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
  • Personalized attention: We believe in providing one-on-one attention to each client, ensuring that you understand your rights and options throughout the legal process.
  • Aggressive advocacy: We are not afraid to take on tough cases and fight vigorously for our clients’ rights in and out of the courtroom.
  • Creative solutions: Our attorneys are skilled negotiators and problem-solvers who can find creative solutions to even the most challenging legal issues.

If you or a loved one is facing federal charges in Washington state, don’t hesitate to contact Spodek Law Group for a consultation. Our attorneys are available 24/7 to provide the guidance and representation you need during this difficult time.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now