Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

Using External Communications to Combat Civil Investigative Demand Attention

By Spodek Law Group | January 24, 2024
(Last Updated On: January 24, 2024)

Using External Communications to Combat Civil Investigative Demand Attention

Civil investigative demands (CIDs) can be burdensome for companies, requiring significant time and resources to respond. However, companies under CID investigation have options to push back against unreasonable demands. External communications with regulators and petitioning to limit or quash CIDs are two strategies companies can use.

What are Civil Investigative Demands?

Civil investigative demands allow government agencies like the Federal Trade Commission to compel companies to provide information and documents related to investigations into potential legal violations
CIDs function similarly to subpoenas. They require companies to respond to interrogatories, provide written reports, produce documents, and submit tangible items relevant to investigations. Failure to comply can result in enforcement action.

Responding to Onerous CID Specifications

While companies are expected to bear some burden responding to CIDs, agencies should not impose undue burdens
. Companies can push back when CID specifications are unreasonably broad or burdensome.

Petition to Limit or Quash

If specifications seem indefinite or overly burdensome, companies can petition to limit or quash the CID
. This involves submitting a written legal argument identifying issues with the CID and requesting modifications.
Companies would argue specifications are too burdensome if responding would disrupt normal business operations or require unreasonable effort or expense. Arguments to quash focus on specifications being indefinite or requesting irrelevant information.

Negotiate with Regulators

Another option is trying to negotiate the scope of specifications directly with regulators
. This involves explaining issues with current specifications and proposing reasonable modifications.
Regulators want to avoid litigation over CID disputes, so may be open to good faith negotiations. However, they ultimately have discretion in determining the appropriate scope.

Leveraging External Communications

In addition to formal petitions and negotiations, external communications can shape how agencies approach CID specifications and enforcement.

Involve Senior Officials

Senior business leaders can communicate directly with senior regulatory officials to voice concerns over a CID’s scope or relevance
. These external communications should be transparent, with investigative staff included.
High-level communications bring visibility to issues and can motivate agencies to reconsider burdensome demands. However, overreach risks being seen as political interference.

Develop a Communications Strategy

Work with legal counsel and communications professionals to brief media outlets and industry advocates on unreasonable CID specifications
Control the narrative by proactively communicating how specifications exceed investigatory needs or regulatory authority. This can pressure agencies to scale back demands.

Submit Comment Letters

When agencies request public comments on proposed regulations, submit letters highlighting issues with existing CID practices
Comments can influence future regulatory changes. Collective action through industry groups also carries more weight.

What Information Should Initial Responses Include?

The initial priority is demonstrating cooperation and transparency. Provide high-level information about organizational structure, data systems, and personnel
Respond thoroughly to specifications not subject to dispute. For example, provide policies, procedures, org charts, and transaction-level sales data.
If specifications seem unreasonable, seek clarification from agency staff about what information they are truly seeking to obtain. Offer to provide samples while negotiating limitations.
Getting basic information to regulators early builds goodwill. Refusing any compliance without justification appears obstructionist.

Avoiding Missteps When Responding to CIDs

Mishandling responses can worsen regulatory scrutiny. Ensure legal counsel guides decision-making to avoid common mistakes.

Don’t Destroy Documents

Notification provisions prohibit destroying documents after receiving a CID, even in normal course of business
. Avoid any appearance of concealing relevant information.

Don’t Overuse Keyword Filtering

While keyword searches help filter data for review and production, agencies can compel companies to provide statistically significant samples of excluded non-privileged documents
Blanket exclusions raise compliance questions. Catalogue and selectively sample excluded materials to demonstrate reasonableness.

Track All Search Efforts

Document every step taken to gather responsive materials, including search tools, terms, and processes
Transparently log and explain review methodologies. It demonstrates good faith efforts to regulators.

Key Takeaways

Petition to limit or quash unreasonably burdensome CID specifications
Negotiate scopes of information requests with regulatory staff
Communicate externally to bring attention to problematic CIDs
Provide cooperative initial responses focused on high-level information
Avoid destroying documents or over-filtering data productions


FTC Petition to Limit Abbott Labs CID
Managing Civil Investigative Demands
Leveraging Public Comments in Rulemaking

Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything was explained and any concerns...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!