Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) frequently issues civil investigative demands (CIDs) to companies as part of investigations into potential consumer protection or antitrust violations. These information requests are similar to subpoenas and are legally enforceable in court.
Receipt of an FTC CID signals that a company’s practices have drawn scrutiny that could eventually spur further regulatory action or even class action lawsuits. Thus, CIDs can indicate heightened legal and financial risks.
A CID is an administrative subpoena that compels the production of documents, data, testimony, and other information from a company. It empowers the FTC to gather evidence during investigations into unfair or deceptive trade practices, antitrust issues, and more.
The FTC does not need court approval to issue CIDs. It can deploy them at its discretion before initiating any formal legal proceedings.
CIDs typically seek vast amounts of information related to a company’s internal records, communications, organizational structure, and business relationships. Recipients usually have tight deadlines for compliance, often just weeks or months.
There are several reasons why a firm might get served with an FTC CID:
FTC probes focus on enforcing key consumer protection and antitrust laws. Some areas they commonly investigate using CIDs include:
Handling FTC investigations and responding to CIDs properly is critical for companies. Here are some key steps:
The fallout from an FTC investigation can be extensive. Beyond huge fines and business restrictions imposed by regulators, companies also face increased class action litigation risks after getting hit with a CID.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys closely monitor FTC activities for opportunities to file follow-on lawsuits on related consumer issues. For instance, if an FTC deception probe into a pharmaceutical company becomes public knowledge, plaintiff lawyers may leverage the FTC’s allegations when bringing false advertising class actions.
And merely receiving an FTC CID acts as a red flag that a company’s practices have raised government scrutiny. Plaintiff attorneys are even more likely to pursue class litigation in situations where practices have drawn regulatory attention.
There are several key factors that make class action lawsuits more likely after companies get an FTC CID:
While challenging, proactive strategies can help curb class action risks tied to FTC investigations:
In summary, getting an FTC CID could open the floodgates for class action lawsuits. It pays to engage experienced counsel to interface with the FTC while also developing mitigation strategies preemptively to limit follow-on litigation risks.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.