Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
When a company receives a civil investigative demand (CID) from the Federal Trade Commission, it can often feel overwhelming trying to respond, especially if the requests seem burdensome or overly broad. The FTC has broad authority to investigate potential violations of consumer protection laws, but companies do have some rights when responding to a CID.
The first step is to carefully review the CID and try to understand the scope of the FTC’s investigation. The CID should include a resolution from the FTC stating the nature and purpose of the investigation . This will provide context for the information requests and can help assess whether they reasonably relate to the investigation.
If the purpose stated in the resolution seems overly broad or vague, that may form the basis for an objection. For example, if the resolution authorizes an investigation into “potential anticompetitive practices” without further detail, the company could argue the requests are not sufficiently tailored to a specific issue .
The company should also evaluate whether complying with the CID would be unduly burdensome or require producing information not reasonably relevant to the investigation. This involves assessing factors like:
If certain specifications seem disproportionate to the investigation’s scope, are duplicative of past productions, or inquire into sensitive or privileged information, the company can object on relevance or burden grounds .
The company can file a petition with the FTC Commissioner asking to limit or quash certain specifications in the CID. The petition must be filed within 20 days and should clearly state the objections and propose modifications to tailor the requests appropriately.
When asserting burden, it is helpful to provide concrete evidence through affidavits or expert testimony estimating the costs and resources required to fully respond. Prior FTC decisions limiting similar requests can also help demonstrate overbreadth or lack of relevance .
If the FTC denies the petition, the company can seek judicial review in federal court. However, courts generally defer to the FTC’s broad investigative authority, so the burden remains high to prove unreasonableness or that requests fall outside the agency’s jurisdiction .
Nonetheless, seeking judicial review is still an important step to challenge problematic portions of a CID and protect the company’s rights. At a minimum, negotiations with the FTC may lead to beneficial limitations on scope even if court intervention is not secured.
Before resorting to litigation, the company should negotiate cooperatively with the FTC to narrow overbroad specifications. While the FTC cannot compromise on requests clearly within the purview of its investigation, discussions can focus on reducing burden through sampling protocols, date restrictions, or custodian limitations .
If negotiations reach an impasse, the company can reassert its objections through a petition or in court. But working constructively with FTC staff will demonstrate reasonableness and good faith efforts to respond appropriately.
The company must also be very careful not to inadvertently waive privileges or protections when responding to a CID. It is advisable to enter a confidentiality agreement with the FTC early in the process to guard against public disclosure of sensitive business information or trade secrets .
Additionally, the company should clearly designate any inadvertently produced privileged materials, such as attorney-client communications or attorney work product, in accordance with Federal Rule of Evidence 502. This avoids blanket privilege waivers and limits the waiver to that specific disclosure.
The goal when responding to an FTC CID is to provide enough information to satisfy the investigation without fueling further enforcement actions. Admissions of past wrongdoing should be avoided. Instead, responses should emphasize the company’s commitment to compliance and willingness to remedy any potential issues.
If subsequent litigation does occur, early production of privileged documents or admissions made to FTC staff could come back to haunt the company. Counsel should always bear this risk in mind when interacting with agency representatives or answering specifications .
Responding to an expansive FTC CID can be a daunting task, but understanding the process and protecting your rights is critical. Companies should:
With the help of experienced legal counsel, companies can respond appropriately to CIDs and manage the inquiry without further escalation.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.