24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Pennsylvania Federal Sentencing Guidelines

March 29, 2024

Understanding Pennsylvania Federal Sentencing Guidelines

If you’re facing federal criminal charges in Pennsylvania, it’s crucial to understand how the federal sentencing guidelines work. These guidelines provide a framework for judges to determine an appropriate sentence based on the specifics of your case. In this article, we’ll break down the key aspects of the Pennsylvania federal sentencing guidelines and discuss how an experienced criminal defense attorney can help navigate this complex process.

What are the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are a set of rules that federal judges use to determine the appropriate punishment for defendants convicted of a crime. These guidelines consider various factors, such as:

  • The severity of the offense
  • The defendant’s criminal history
  • Any aggravating or mitigating circumstances

The goal of the guidelines is to promote uniformity and fairness in sentencing across federal courts. However, it‘s important to note that judges have some discretion to deviate from the guidelines based on the unique circumstances of each case.As one Reddit user explains, “The guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. Judges must calculate the guidelines range, but they can sentence outside that range if they find that the case falls outside the ‘heartland’ of typical cases.”

How are Sentences Calculated Under the Guidelines?

The federal sentencing guidelines use a point system to calculate a defendant’s sentence. Each offense is assigned a base offense level, which is then adjusted based on specific characteristics of the crime and the defendant‘s criminal history.Here’s a basic overview of how it works:

  1. Determine the base offense level for the crime
  2. Apply any specific offense characteristics that may increase or decrease the offense level
  3. Determine the defendant’s criminal history category
  4. Use the sentencing table to find the guideline range based on the offense level and criminal history category

For example, let’s say a defendant is convicted of bank robbery, which has a base offense level of 20. If the defendant used a gun during the robbery, the offense level would increase by 5 points. The defendant’s criminal history is then factored in to determine the guideline range.It’s a complex system, but an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer can help you understand how the guidelines apply to your specific case.

Departures and Variances from the Guidelines

While the sentencing guidelines provide a starting point, judges have the discretion to depart from the guidelines in certain circumstances. These departures can be based on factors such as:

  • Substantial assistance to authorities
  • Coercion or duress
  • Diminished capacity
  • Voluntary disclosure of the offense

In addition to departures, judges can also vary from the guidelines based on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, which include things like the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history and characteristics of the defendant, and the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense and provide just punishment.

As one Quora user notes, “In my experience, variances are more common than departures. Judges often find that the guidelines are too harsh, especially for non-violent drug offenses.”

The Importance of Legal Representation

Navigating the federal sentencing guidelines is a complex and high-stakes process. That’s why it‘s crucial to have an experienced criminal defense attorney on your side.A skilled lawyer can:

  • Negotiate with prosecutors for a reduced charge or sentence
  • Argue for departures or variances from the guidelines
  • Present mitigating evidence to the court
  • Ensure your rights are protected throughout the process

As FindLaw explains, “An attorney can argue for a sentence that is lower than the standard range, if there are factors that warrant a lesser sentence. These factors could include things like the defendant‘s role in the offense, mental health issues, or addiction problems.”

Real-World Examples

To better understand how the federal sentencing guidelines work in practice, let’s look at a few real-world examples:

  • In 2021, a Pennsylvania man was sentenced to 18 months in prison for his role in a $2.7 million COVID-19 relief fraud scheme. The judge varied downward from the guideline range due to the defendant’s lack of criminal history and his minor role in the offense. (Source)
  • In 2020, a Pittsburgh-area doctor was sentenced to 41 months in prison for illegally distributing opioids. The judge departed upward from the guideline range due to the defendant’s abuse of his position of trust and the harm caused to the community. (Source)
  • In 2019, a Philadelphia man was sentenced to 15 years in prison for sex trafficking of a minor. The judge imposed a sentence within the guideline range, citing the seriousness of the offense and the need to protect the public. (Source)

These examples illustrate how the guidelines are applied in different scenarios and how judges can exercise their discretion based on the facts of the case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Are the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory?

A: No, the guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. However, judges must still calculate the guideline range and consider it when determining a sentence.

Q: Can a judge sentence outside the guideline range?

A: Yes, judges can depart or vary from the guidelines based on specific factors outlined in the law. However, they must explain their reasoning for doing so.

Q: How do prior convictions affect sentencing under the guidelines?

A: Prior convictions can significantly increase a defendant’s criminal history category, leading to a higher guideline range. The more serious the prior offenses, the greater the impact on the sentence.

Q: What factors can lead to a downward departure or variance from the guidelines?

A: Factors that can lead to a lower sentence include substantial assistance to authorities, diminished capacity, coercion or duress, and voluntary disclosure of the offense.

Q: How can a criminal defense attorney help with federal sentencing?

A: An experienced criminal defense attorney can advocate for a lower sentence by negotiating with prosecutors, arguing for departures or variances, and presenting mitigating evidence to the court. They can also ensure your rights are protected throughout the process.

The Bottom Line

The Pennsylvania federal sentencing guidelines play a significant role in determining the outcome of criminal cases. Understanding how these guidelines work and having a skilled attorney on your side can make a huge difference in the sentence you receive.If you’re facing federal charges in Pennsylvania, don’t navigate this complex system alone. Contact our experienced criminal defense attorneys today for a free consultation. We’ll work tirelessly to achieve the best possible outcome in your case.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now