Criminal Defense Lawyers

Overview of Amendment 821 | Amendment 821 Lawyers

Amendment 821 Sentencing Guideline Changes: Implications and Analysis

The recent passage of Amendment 821 by the United States Sentencing Commission represents a major shift in federal sentencing policy. This amendment, which goes into effect on November 1, 2023 and can be applied retroactively starting February 1, 2024, makes several evidence-based changes to the sentencing guidelines regarding criminal history points.

Background on Federal Sentencing

Federal sentences are largely determined by the US Sentencing Guidelines, which provide recommended sentencing ranges based on the defendant’s criminal history and the nature of the offense. Judges use a point system to calculate the defendant’s criminal history category and offense level, which are then used to find the applicable sentencing range on the Sentencing Table.Amendment 821 specifically targets two aspects of this point system:

• Status Points: Additional points given if the defendant committed the offense while under a criminal justice sentence like probation or parole (§4A1.1).
• Zero Criminal History Points: Defendants with no prior offenses often still receive prison time even if they are first time offenders.

This amendment aims to reduce sentences for offenders with minimal criminal histories who did not commit violent crimes or crimes against vulnerable victims.

Details of Amendment 821

Amendment 821 contains two main parts:

Part A – Limiting Status Points

The Commission found that assigning status points in all cases overstated the significance of criminal history. Under the new rules:

• Status points will only apply if the defendant has at least one criminal history point under §4A1.1 before the status points are added. This excludes low-level offenders.
• There is a cap of 3 status points, preventing excessive increases for multiple prior sentences.
• Offenders who receive status points will be eligible for a downward departure if the status points over-represent their criminal history.

Part B, Subpart 1 – Reduction for Zero-Point Offenders

This creates a new Chapter Four guideline at §4C1.1 that reduces sentences by 2 levels for defendants with:

• No criminal history points under Chapter Four
• No aggravating factors like violence, vulnerable victims, etc.

There is also a presumption against imprisonment for qualifying offenders in lower sentencing ranges.

Impact of Retroactive Application

The Commission voted 4-3 to allow delayed retroactive application of Amendment 821 starting on February 1, 2024.This will allow currently incarcerated individuals to petition courts for sentence reductions under the new, lower guideline ranges. According to the Commission’s analysis, retroactivity could benefit over 10,000 federal inmates:

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Loveth Okpedo

2024-03-12

Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience

Bee L

2024-02-28

Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.

divesh patel

2024-02-24

I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Load more

Google rating score: 4.9 of 5, based on 736 reviews

• 11,495 inmates may qualify for lower ranges under Part A, with average reductions of 11.7%
• 7,272 inmates may qualify under Part B, with average reductions of 17.6%

Courts still have discretion whether to reduce sentences, but thousands could see lower prison terms if Amendment 821 is applied retroactively.

Analysis of the Amendment 821’s Impact

Amendment 821 has been praised by advocates as an incremental but meaningful step toward criminal justice reform. Here are some of the potential implications:

• Fairer Sentences for Low-Risk Offenders: By limiting enhancements for minor criminal histories, Amendment 821 helps ensure sentences better match the offender’s risk level and culpability. This could reduce excessive punishment of first-time and low-level offenders.
• Increased Judicial Discretion: The changes give judges more flexibility to depart from guidelines in cases where criminal history points overstate the defendant’s background. This allows for more customized, individualized sentencing.
• Focus on Rehabilitation Over Retribution: The presumption against incarceration for zero-point offenders recognizes that alternatives like probation and diversion programs may better serve justice and prevent recidivism.
• Racial Disparities: Because Black and Hispanic defendants are more likely to have criminal records, reducing emphasis on criminal history could help mitigate racial sentencing disparities.
• Overcrowded Prisons: Retroactive application creates a rare opportunity for early release that could relieve strained BOP resources and overcrowding.

However, some argue the amendment does not go far enough:

• The changes still tie sentences to flawed criminal history metrics instead of focusing solely on the instant offense. Critics argue criminal history points should be eliminated entirely.
• Eligibility criteria exclude many serious offenses, limiting impact on violent crime and public safety. Some say more wholesale reform is needed to reduce mass incarceration.
• Despite increased discretion, judges may hesitate to deviate from guidelines even in cases where criminal history overstates risk. Binding guidelines still dictate sentences in most cases.

Overall Amendment 821 represents a measured approach to more just and proportional sentences, but broader reforms to federal sentencing policy may be needed to significantly reduce incarceration.

Looking Ahead

While not a panacea, Amendment 821 is a noteworthy step by the Commission. The bipartisan vote and support from both progressive and conservative commissioners suggest growing consensus for evidence-based reforms.In its latest policy priorities, the Commission outlined additional areas for study, including:

• Assessing effectiveness of Bureau of Prisons practices in meeting sentencing goals
• Updating career offender penalties and categorical approach
• Reviewing how guidelines treat acquitted conduct at sentencing

These issues could form the basis of future amendments that shape federal sentencing policy and practice. Stakeholders will be closely monitoring the Commission’s work as momentum for reform continues to build.For now, Amendment 821 provides new hope for current prisoners and a template for further progress in making federal sentences more just, proportional, and focused on rehabilitation over retribution. Defendants with minimal criminal histories and offenders granted retroactive relief stand to benefit most immediately from these landmark changes.