24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

NJ Public Safety Assessment (“PSA”)

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

 

Public Safety Assessment (PSA) in NJ

In New Jersey, judges use the Public Safety Assessment (PSA) to help determine whether defendants should be detained pending trial or released with conditions. The PSA uses a data-driven risk assessment approach to promote fairer pretrial decision making.

What is the Public Safety Assessment?

The PSA is a pretrial risk assessment instrument developed by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to improve pretrial decision making. It uses the defendant’s criminal history, age, and current charges to generate risk scores assessing their risk of [1]:

Judges weigh these objective risk scores when deciding bail and pretrial release.

How the PSA Risk Assessment Works

The PSA analyzes nine factors about the defendant to calculate risk scores [2]:

  1. Age at current arrest
  2. Current violent offense charged
  3. Pending charge at time of offense
  4. Prior misdemeanor conviction
  5. Prior felony conviction
  6. Prior violent conviction
  7. Prior failure to appear in past 2 years
  8. Prior failure to appear older than 2 years
  9. Prior sentence to incarceration

No subjective or discriminatory factors like race, income, or neighborhood are considered.

PSA Pretrial Risk Levels

Based on the risk scores, the PSA assigns defendants to risk levels [3]:

  • Level 1 – Low risk
  • Level 2 – Moderate risk
  • Level 3 – High risk

Judges weigh these risk levels, along with other statutory factors, when setting pretrial release conditions for each defendant.

Goals of the Public Safety Assessment

New Jersey implemented the PSA in 2017 to [4]:

  • Make pretrial decisions more objective and transparent
  • Reduce reliance on monetary bail
  • Improve public safety and court appearance rates through data-driven risk assessment
  • Reduce unnecessary pretrial detention of low-risk defendants

The PSA aims to promote fairer, more effective pretrial decision making statewide.

PSA Implementation in New Jersey

All New Jersey counties use the PSA tool at the following stages [5]:

  • Pre-First Appearance – Police complete PSA within 12 hours of warrantless arrest
  • First Appearance – Judge considers PSA risk scores in bail decision
  • Post-First Appearance – Pretrial services officers verify and update PSA as needed

The PSA provides crucial information at each phase of the pretrial process.

Using the PSA for Bail and Release Decisions

While not the sole factor, the PSA risk levels guide judges in pretrial release and bail-setting decisions. Typical guidelines are [6]:

  • Level 1 – ROR or minimal monitoring
  • Level 2 – ROR or standard monitoring conditions
  • Level 3 – Consider additional monitoring or detention

However, judges can depart from the PSA recommendations by entering reasons on the record.

Criticisms and Concerns About the PSA

Some concerns raised about the PSA include:

  • Perpetuates systemic biases by relying on factors like criminal history
  • Does not measure the defendant’s dangerousness or violence risk
  • Fails to sufficiently individualize recommendations
  • Reduces judicial discretion and neutrality through data reliance

However, the PSA aims to counteract bias by focusing solely on empirical risk factors.

Right to Contest PSA Recommendations

While judges consider the PSA, defendants maintain full rights to [7]:

  • Review their PSA report
  • Contest any incorrect facts or findings
  • Present evidence for why they should be released on different conditions than recommended

The PSA does not replace judges’ decision-making authority or defendants’ rights.

Future Outlook for PSA Use

While not perfect, data shows the PSA improves pretrial outcomes and reduces bias. Wider adoption of risk assessment tools seems likely as states reform bail laws and practices.

However, pretrial risk assessments continue to raise important questions about fairness, transparency, and relying on algorithms in criminal justice decisions.

 

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now