24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Negotiating SEC Settlements: Key Factors for Defense Lawyers

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

Negotiating SEC Settlements: Key Factors for Defense Lawyers

Dealing with an SEC investigation can be stressful and intimidating for any company or individual. However, skilled defense lawyers can help their clients navigate the process and negotiate favorable settlements. This article outlines key factors for defense lawyers to consider when negotiating resolutions with the SEC.

Understand the SEC’s Motivations

The SEC’s primary motivation in any enforcement action is to protect investors and maintain market integrity. However, the SEC also wants to use its resources efficiently and avoid lengthy litigation when possible. Knowing this can help defense lawyers frame settlement proposals that serve both parties’ interests.

For example, highlighting how a settlement will benefit investors or implement improved internal controls may resonate with SEC attorneys. Additionally, proposing reasonable penalties and disgorgement amounts that avoid prolonged legal proceedings can also be appealing.

Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Case

Conducting a thorough investigation into the facts and assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the SEC’s case is critical. This involves reviewing documents, interviewing witnesses, analyzing applicable laws and rules, and evaluating the SEC’s legal theories and evidence.

While the SEC may present damaging facts initially, skilled defense lawyers can often uncover important mitigating evidence through their own investigation. If significant weaknesses in the SEC’s case exist, defense counsel can use these to argue for a better settlement.

Consider Potential Collateral Consequences

Beyond direct sanctions like fines and disgorgement, SEC settlements can trigger additional collateral consequences. These include:

  • Statutory disqualifications from certain exemptions or safe harbors
  • “Bad actor” disqualifications from private offerings
  • Reputational damage
  • Shareholder litigation
  • Issues with customers, counterparties, and creditors

Evaluating these potential ripple effects allows defense lawyers to fully appreciate their client’s exposure and negotiate provisions to limit collateral damage. For example, obtaining waivers of automatic statutory disqualifications where appropriate can be extremely valuable.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Assess the Client’s Risk Tolerance

While avoiding litigation costs is a major driver for settlements, defense lawyers must also gauge their client’s appetite for risk. Some companies and individuals are inclined to fight allegations vigorously, while others prefer settling quickly.

Clients focused on avoiding reputational damage or uncertainty may favor early resolution, even if litigation risks appear manageable. On the other hand, clients staunchly believing in their innocence may want to litigate. Clear communication about pros, cons, and alternatives is essential.

Leverage Experience and Relationships

Seasoned defense lawyers adept at negotiating SEC settlements can provide invaluable perspective. Their past dealings with specific SEC attorneys and knowledge of typical settlement ranges for similar cases can inform discussions.

Additionally, many large law firms have attorneys who previously worked at the SEC. Their inside knowledge of the agency’s thinking can help shape effective arguments and proposals during negotiations.

Propose Creative Settlement Terms

Typical SEC settlements involve monetary payments, undertakings, and sanctions. However, experienced defense counsel can often craft creative, customized settlement terms that benefit both parties.

Examples include enhanced internal compliance programs, improved training and education for employees, cooperation commitments to assist other SEC matters, and unique reporting or monitoring arrangements. Proposing these types of extra measures shows the client’s commitment to reform.

Emphasize Remediation and Cooperation

Settlement proposals should highlight the respondent’s remediation efforts and cooperation with SEC staff. Demonstrating prompt corrective actions (like firing wrongdoers, improving internal controls, or retracting/correcting disclosures) can help reduce sanctions.

Likewise, underscoring the client’s assistance during the investigation, such as through document production, interviews, and sharing internal reports, can also favorably influence settlement terms.

Consider Using Mediators or SEC Advisory Committees

If settlement talks stall, defense lawyers can suggest bringing in mediators or SEC advisory committees. Mediators can facilitate constructive dialogue and bridge gaps between the parties’ positions. Advisory committees provide recommendations to SEC staff on proposed settlements.

Getting a neutral third-party perspective can sometimes yield creative compromises and break logjams. However, mediation does entail additional time and costs that should be weighed.

Don’t Reflexively Settle

Despite the allure of avoiding litigation, defense counsel should not reflexively recommend settling in every SEC matter. Sometimes, the risks of an adverse outcome in litigation may be low enough to justify fighting allegations.

For example, if the SEC’s case relies on questionable legal theories, weak evidence, or mitigating facts exist, litigation may be a viable option. Defense lawyers have a duty to provide their unbiased assessment, even if it means recommending against settlement.

Maximize Use of Wells Submissions

The Wells process provides respondents an opportunity to submit a written statement contesting allegations and legal theories before enforcement actions are recommended. Wells submissions allow defense counsel to preview deficiencies in the SEC’s reasoning and evidence.

Thorough, well-reasoned Wells submissions can sometimes dissuade SEC staff from pursuing charges altogether. At a minimum, they lay the groundwork for favorable settlement negotiations by front-running the SEC’s arguments.

Don’t Make Early Settlement Offers

Defense lawyers should generally refrain from making concrete settlement offers in early-stage discussions with SEC staff. Making lowball offers prematurely signals weakness and rarely gains traction.

Instead, counsel should use initial meetings to probe the SEC’s expectations and priorities first. This allows subsequent settlement proposals to be better calibrated once more is known about likely settlement ranges.

Use Multiple Forms of Communication

Finally, defense lawyers should use multiple forms of communication during settlement negotiations. While in-person meetings and phone calls can be effective, email and written correspondence can be equally important.

  • Email allows creating a written record and trail of settlement offers and counterproposals. It also provides time for both sides to carefully evaluate positions.
  • Letters facilitate laying out arguments and terms in a detailed, nuanced way not always possible verbally. They also memorialize important points.
  • In-person meetings and calls enable reading body language and vocal tones to better understand motivations and flexibility.
  • Joint, real-time drafting of settlement documents can accelerate progress through collaboration.

Leveraging these different channels tailored to various negotiation phases and objectives can improve communication and outcomes. However, defense lawyers must ensure consistency across platforms to avoid mixed messages.

Consider Admitting Lesser Charges

In some cases, admitting to lesser statutory violations can expedite settlements if fighting higher charges seems unwise. This allows closure on more limited violations rather than prolonging the battle.

For example, a company may admit to inadequate books and records or internal controls issues as part of a settlement, without admitting more serious fraud claims. Or an individual may admit to negligent conduct without knowingly violating securities laws.

However, defense counsel must weigh the collateral impacts of any admissions carefully. And admissions should only cover conduct the evidence clearly establishes, in keeping with ethics rules on truthful representations.

Seek Upfront Closure with Individuals

During corporate enforcement actions, SEC staff frequently demand sanctions against or bars of individual executives as part of settlements. However, obtaining upfront closures for officers, directors, or employees can limit their liability.

Settling individually with key personnel before finalizing corporate settlements can reduce uncertainty. It also contains damage to specific people rather than prolonging their case exposure.

That said, corporate interests and individual interests do not always align. Separate counsel may be advisable to avoid conflicts of interest when seeking individual closures.

Insist on Confidentiality

SEC settlements often become public through litigation releases or administrative proceedings. However, defense counsel can try negotiating confidentiality provisions, especially for individuals.

While the SEC strongly prefers transparency, it will sometimes agree to secrecy in limited circumstances. For example, anonymity may be possible if an individual did not profit from wrongdoing and agrees to cooperate.

That said, secrecy reduces deterrence value, so the SEC will likely insist on disclosure absent unusual circumstances. And courts can reject confidential settlements if deemed contrary to public policy.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now